TrueBlue Posted May 30, 2013 Report Posted May 30, 2013 This doesn't seem as official to me as I once thought, but the logo has been "leaked" http://news.sportslogos.net/2013/05/30/ ... ogos-here/ Thoughts?
Mike Posted May 30, 2013 Report Posted May 30, 2013 Very solid MS Paint logo. A+ effort, Ottawa. Then again, our logo is a god damn giant W so I guess I shouldn't throw stones.
Fraser Posted May 30, 2013 Report Posted May 30, 2013 I likes the previous options shown better. This looks arena/college ball to me.
SPuDS Posted May 30, 2013 Report Posted May 30, 2013 I likes the previous options shown better. This looks arena/college ball to me. good call.. it does kinda seem shoddy and weak for a CFL team.. *shrug* but like Mike said, our W is pretty basic too lol.
SPuDS Posted May 30, 2013 Report Posted May 30, 2013 Still can't believe the name. yea, pretty sad choice, truth be told.. I didn't realize the ottawa team would be playing by aussie league rules..
iso_55 Posted May 30, 2013 Report Posted May 30, 2013 Still can't believe the name. Looks like they're actually going with that name.... unfreakingbelievable. :roll:
Fraser Posted May 30, 2013 Report Posted May 30, 2013 I likes the previous options shown better. This looks arena/college ball to me. good call.. it does kinda seem shoddy and weak for a CFL team.. *shrug* but like Mike said, our W is pretty basic too lol. I think if anything a plain logo suits a professional team. Look at stuff like green bay packers or the cubs or something. Its an arena team or college team or an expansion team that tends to have a lot of flashy lines jagged edges and stuff. To me the logo screams "expansion team" and I know they are, but with a name like red blacks it's like they are trying to go throwback with the name. Pick a direction.
voodoochylde Posted May 30, 2013 Report Posted May 30, 2013 I likes the previous options shown better. This looks arena/college ball to me. good call.. it does kinda seem shoddy and weak for a CFL team.. *shrug* but like Mike said, our W is pretty basic too lol. I think if anything a plain logo suits a professional team. Look at stuff like green bay packers or the cubs or something. Its an arena team or college team or an expansion team that tends to have a lot of flashy lines jagged edges and stuff. To me the logo screams "expansion team" and I know they are, but with a name like red blacks it's like they are trying to go throwback with the name. Pick a direction. Completely agree. The message seems a bit scatter shot (by that the name / logo or visible representation of the team don't necessarily jive). The 'buzzsaw' look to the logo certainly doesn't help matters either. A simple, understated logo would have been better in my opinion.
Zontar Posted May 30, 2013 Report Posted May 30, 2013 With cool logo they salvaged something good out of the naming fiasco and media leak . Name and logo was never going to please everybody anyway. Anything old school would be seen as "too old fashioned". Anything unusual or new would be "ridiculous".
tacklewasher Posted May 30, 2013 Report Posted May 30, 2013 Still can't believe the name. Looks like they're actually going with that name.... unfreakingbelievable. :roll: I'm sure they will change it at some point. The Ottawa Native American/African Americans
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now