Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
5 minutes ago, AKAChip said:

You’re absolutely right that the offence was brutal but how much of that is having a QB that can’t get playmakers the ball and caves under the slightlest pressure? Most would argue a lot of it. 

GFT! How many times did we have pressure on Mitchell today???? More than Nichols had pressure on him. Yet Mitchell continues to look downfield and make plays. Nichols gets happy feet and shits his pants.

Posted
1 minute ago, AKAChip said:

The controversy is that people will continue to defend Nichols regardless of how many embarrassing performances he puts up. This Bomber team was really good at almost every position but Nichols was routinely below average and frequently abysmal. It’s the attitude of blaming the rest of the team and not holding Nichols accountable that keeps us in perennial mediocrity. You cannot win it all with a QB like Nichols unless literally everything else goes right. This isn’t how you win with regularity in the CFL. 

We were really good at the receiver position? 

Our pass blocking was good? 

What game are you watching? 

Posted
2 minutes ago, AKAChip said:

The controversy is that people will continue to defend Nichols regardless of how many embarrassing performances he puts up. This Bomber team was really good at almost every position but Nichols was routinely below average and frequently abysmal. It’s the attitude of blaming the rest of the team and not holding Nichols accountable that keeps us in perennial mediocrity. You cannot win it all with a QB like Nichols unless literally everything else goes right. This isn’t how you win with regularity in the CFL. 

And eventually you'll play a team with a QB.

BLM didn't even break a sweat today and threw 3 TD's.  He played like ****.  Still puts up points.

Posted (edited)
Just now, White Out said:

We were really good at the receiver position? 

Our pass blocking was good? 

What game are you watching? 

Will you just try save face for yourself and admit that Nichols sucked tonight? Yes, of course there were other factors. But please do it for you own sake, man. It'll at least give you some credibility for future discussion.

Edited by Dr Zaius
Posted

This is the most talented Bomber team I've seen fall flat on it's face in a playoff game. Wow. How embarrassing.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Scorch said:

I wouldn’t put so much blame on Nichols as much as Bombers recievers and Harris. They should’ve caught the straight up catches

What straight up drops have we had today? The only one I can think of would’ve resulted in a loss of yards. Are you serious?

Posted
1 minute ago, bustamente said:

I may be out of my flipping mind but I see MOS is blue next year ......................Double Blue

He can take Nichols and Harris with him....way too much film on those two now anyway...

Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, White Out said:

We were really good at the receiver position? 

Our pass blocking was good? 

What game are you watching? 

I said good at almost every position. They were not great at receiver but, yes their pass blocking was good. A decent QB doesn’t turtle with the slightest pressure. Pressure is not abnormal in the CFL regardless how good your line is. 

Edited by AKAChip
Posted
1 minute ago, Dr Zaius said:

Will you just try save face for yourself and admit that Nichols sucked tonight? Yes, of course there were other factors. But please do it for you own sake, man. It'll at least give you some credibility for future discussion.

You must have a learning disability. I've said he's had a very poor game a. Number of Times 

Posted (edited)
Just now, White Out said:

You must have a learning disability. I've said he's had a very poor game a. Number of Times 

Yet you refuse to admit that this loss is on him. You blame literally EVERYTHING else.

Edited by Dr Zaius
Posted
Just now, Dr Zaius said:

Yet you refuse to admit that this loss is on him. You blame literally EVERYTHING else.

I'm saying this loss falls on a number of factors, including and not limited to Nichols. 

You must have very loving parents to deal with your comprehension problems. 

Posted (edited)
Just now, White Out said:

I'm saying this loss falls on a number of factors, including and not limited to Nichols. 

You must have very loving parents to deal with your comprehension problems. 

Dude, seriously everyone is against you in this discussion and you don't see it lol

But you're right. Everyone else is wrong

Edited by Dr Zaius
Posted
Just now, White Out said:

I'm saying this loss falls on a number of factors, including and not limited to Nichols. 

You must have very loving parents to deal with your comprehension problems. 

Honestly, learn to handle having these conversations without the insults. Period.

Posted
Just now, trueBlue83 said:

Trestman and Steveler 2019

I'm going to make a campaign sign!

Heart be still.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...