Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 minutes ago, 17to85 said:

Who in their right mind would trade for Bridge?

That’s what I thought, although it says there are teams checking out the toll for that particular, ahem, structure.

Posted (edited)
20 hours ago, Ripper said:

Now's your big chance.  Harris for Bridge.  He counts against ratio this year too as a added bonus.  Just a thought

3rd QB, glorified clipboard holder. counts against the ratio - which enables the team to start another INT (at Safety, DL or OL) then let him play special teams (like Bennett did) - I don't it's a bad idea 😅

He won't see the field anyways,

Edited by M.O.A.B.
Posted
9 minutes ago, M.O.A.B. said:

3rd QB, glorified clipboard holder. counts against the ratio - which enables the team to start another INT (at Safety, DL or OL) then let him play special teams (like Bennett did) - I don't it's a bad idea 😅

He won't see the field anyways,

The league should let backup Canadian qb's count against the ratio.  It would encourage every team to have at least one on roster. Would be good for our CIS programs

Posted
3 hours ago, Throw Long Bannatyne said:

The knife didn't cut deep enough, that elusive devil Kavis survives again!

I think this is likely to be a reprieve rather than an vote of confidence. Reed has to be the hands-down worst GM in the league.

Posted

Let me start by saying please forgive me if this has already been discussed somewhere. I looked and couldn't find it.

Are there new uniform rules for this season? I understand the change is to New Era but do teams only have 1 uniform? Just this week we saw Sask and Mont wearing whites at home. The Calgary/ B.C. game had both teams in colours. Does anyone know? Has this been discussed?

 

Posted
52 minutes ago, Geebrr said:

CFL teams have used one uniform only in the pre season for as long as I can remember.

Thank you, I guess I never noticed before. Possibly this year I was watching closer due to the new supplier.

Posted

I always give the benefit of a doubt when there is doubt. I don’t know, but it seemed something was ‘off’ with Sherman. He seemed to be behind the curve, and now he admits it. 

The over the hill comment is unjustified, especially if there are other issues involved, but the man is 64 and we may be looking at something else here.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...