wbbfan Posted July 30, 2019 Report Posted July 30, 2019 3 hours ago, Sard said: I will agree that they did well at bringing pressure. 1 hour ago, J5V said: Bah! Your D sucks against the run. Why we didn't run against you is a complete mystery. Had you shut down our run and forced Nichols to pass it would be different. Even then, for some reason Nichols was floating beach balls out there. Any D would have looked good against us. This ham team reminds me a bit of the don mathews als. high pressure and the back end focusing on forcing turn overs.Cover 0 isnt their base but Id say its the modern equivalent and as close as we will see to cover 0 as a base in this era. Floyd 1
Mark H. Posted July 31, 2019 Report Posted July 31, 2019 3 hours ago, wbbfan said: This ham team reminds me a bit of the don mathews als. high pressure and the back end focusing on forcing turn overs.Cover 0 isnt their base but Id say its the modern equivalent and as close as we will see to cover 0 as a base in this era. We are supposed to have the exact weapons needed to beat a D like that. Short passing, Andrew Harris, solid OL GCJenks 1
wbbfan Posted July 31, 2019 Report Posted July 31, 2019 11 minutes ago, Mark H. said: We are supposed to have the exact weapons needed to beat a D like that. Short passing, Andrew Harris, solid OL We are and do. We didnt have the appropriate game plan in place, and didnt execute. Worst of all we continually turned the ball over. Idk what the split is, but when you turn the ball over 5+ times the chances of winning are extremely slim. (I would guess in the 20-30% range) Week 16 we play them next. I hope this game sticks in the teams craw. I want to see the best and nastiest game this team has played under the canadian mafia. Cry havoc and let slip the dogs of war. BigBlueFanatic and Mark H. 2
Tracker Posted July 31, 2019 Report Posted July 31, 2019 53 minutes ago, wbbfan said: We are and do. We didnt have the appropriate game plan in place, and didnt execute. Worst of all we continually turned the ball over. Idk what the split is, but when you turn the ball over 5+ times the chances of winning are extremely slim. (I would guess in the 20-30% range) Week 16 we play them next. I hope this game sticks in the teams craw. I want to see the best and nastiest game this team has played under the canadian mafia. Cry havoc and let slip the dogs of war. No how perfect a game plan is, it will not survive 6 freaking turnovers. wbbfan, Bigblue204 and TBURGESS 3
Mark H. Posted July 31, 2019 Report Posted July 31, 2019 17 minutes ago, Tracker said: No how perfect a game plan is, it will not survive 6 freaking turnovers. Said turnovers were partly the result of not being able to contain a pressure defense. wbbfan 1
wbbfan Posted July 31, 2019 Report Posted July 31, 2019 44 minutes ago, Tracker said: No how perfect a game plan is, it will not survive 6 freaking turnovers. 37 minutes ago, Mark H. said: Said turnovers were partly the result of not being able to contain a pressure defense. Both true. Its cause and effect. Nichols has been struggling when dealing with pressure this year. Pressure is what hammersmell does. We have every thing to counter act that pressure, but instead put him in a bad position. And he did what you would expect of a qb who struggles with pressure and worse.
Noeller Posted July 31, 2019 Report Posted July 31, 2019 aaand now Brandon Banks out this week for Ham......gift wrapping a win for those asshats in the rectangle.
17to85 Posted July 31, 2019 Report Posted July 31, 2019 2 minutes ago, Noeller said: aaand now Brandon Banks out this week for Ham......gift wrapping a win for those asshats in the rectangle. Hey it's not all bad, they still have to play fajardo at qb. Noeller 1
GCJenks Posted July 31, 2019 Report Posted July 31, 2019 4 minutes ago, Noeller said: aaand now Brandon Banks out this week for Ham......gift wrapping a win for those asshats in the rectangle. Thanks for that tidbit, I've been struggling with my picks this week. Wanted to pick Hamilton so bad... Noeller 1
Jpan85 Posted July 31, 2019 Report Posted July 31, 2019 Hahaha JCon, rebusrankin, Wanna-B-Fanboy and 1 other 4
JCon Posted July 31, 2019 Report Posted July 31, 2019 I hope the Riders received nothing in return. rebusrankin 1
Bigblue204 Posted July 31, 2019 Report Posted July 31, 2019 But wasn't Collaros the answer? Remember Rods claim of an 18-0 season if they signed him? lol Also someone needs to seriously tell this guy to hang em up. He just went from one suspect Oline to a team with a absolutely horrible Oline....he won't finish the year.
bearpants Posted July 31, 2019 Report Posted July 31, 2019 That would be amazing if Collaros tore it up in Toronto... 😂 Tracker 1
BBlink Posted July 31, 2019 Report Posted July 31, 2019 Toronto continues to grasp at straws Bigblue204 and blue_gold_84 1 1
JCon Posted July 31, 2019 Report Posted July 31, 2019 Do they intend to provide him some protection? Cause if not....
WBBFanWest Posted July 31, 2019 Report Posted July 31, 2019 This is really unfortunate. The chances of him doing permanent damage to himself (if it hasn't happened already) is so high that it's too bad that the league doesn't step in and say that he's not insurable so no contract will be allowed. Bigblue204 and Noeller 2
rebusrankin Posted July 31, 2019 Report Posted July 31, 2019 I know times are desperate in Toronto but trading for Collaros is a brutal move. Guess Fajardo is now the chosen one in Riderland. wbbfan 1
Fatty Liver Posted July 31, 2019 Report Posted July 31, 2019 MONTREAL — The Montreal Alouettes have released quarterback Brandon Banks and added Antonio Pipkin to the active roster, the team announced Wednesday. https://www.cfl.ca/2019/07/31/als-release-bridge-activate-pipkin/
blue_gold_84 Posted July 31, 2019 Report Posted July 31, 2019 Odd trade. But I guess this is Popp grasping at straws. It's not like he gave up much... Then again, he didn't get much. wbbfan 1
BBlink Posted July 31, 2019 Report Posted July 31, 2019 Montreal could only dream of releasing Brandon Banks Bigblue204, Eternal optimist, rebusrankin and 6 others 1 8
wbbfan Posted July 31, 2019 Report Posted July 31, 2019 7 minutes ago, JCon said: Do they intend to provide him some protection? Cause if not.... Doesnt matter what they intend, they have no ability to execute. The riders are now insanely thin at QB. If Fajardo gets hurt or struggles really bad they have no one to call. I wonder if TO makes a move now. Has the MBT and or Franklin era now ended?
Stickem Posted July 31, 2019 Report Posted July 31, 2019 1 minute ago, BBlink said: Montreal could only dream of releasing Brandon Banks Don't those bozos proof read their stuff......I guess there's little difference between Bridge and Banks ... I suppose it's the language barrier GCJenks 1
Jpan85 Posted July 31, 2019 Report Posted July 31, 2019 Riders have paid him already 200k JCon, Tracker and wbbfan 3
Fatty Liver Posted July 31, 2019 Report Posted July 31, 2019 5 minutes ago, BBlink said: Montreal could only dream of releasing Brandon Banks That's the CFL.ca headline, I didn't even notice the mistake. 😄 BBlink 1
Recommended Posts