Wanna-B-Fanboy Posted July 10, 2019 Report Posted July 10, 2019 2 minutes ago, BomberBall said: Hardrick got fined for that little shove, that took away Darvin's TD, last week. Unreal. Lame. JCon 1
Pete Catan's Ghost Posted July 10, 2019 Report Posted July 10, 2019 7 minutes ago, wanna-b-fanboy said: Lame. He deserved the fine for stupidity. Adrenaline_x and Wideleft 1 1
BomberBall Posted July 10, 2019 Report Posted July 10, 2019 12 minutes ago, wanna-b-fanboy said: Lame. Agreed. Harris had his helmet pulled off by the face mask and that didn't even draw a flag. Mark F, Nickthesizz and NorthernSkunk 3
Noeller Posted July 10, 2019 Report Posted July 10, 2019 7 minutes ago, Pete Catan's Ghost said: He deserved the fine for stupidity. I'm curious -- are you also one of the ones who used to get mad at Wade Miller for taking ST offsides 15 years ago...? Geebrr 1
Mr Dee Posted July 10, 2019 Author Report Posted July 10, 2019 Bob Irving (@BobIrvingCJOB) Tweeted: I think the CFL should fine players for dangerous, cheap hits. But Wpg’s Jermarkus Hardrick got fined for giving a guy an extra, aggressive shove in the Ottawa game. Hardly a fineable offence in my eyes. The 15-yard penalty Hardrick got was punishment enough. NorthernSkunk, BigBlueFanatic, the watcher and 7 others 10
Noeller Posted July 10, 2019 Report Posted July 10, 2019 preach, brother Bob.... rebusrankin, Geebrr, Wanna-B-Fanboy and 2 others 3 2
rebusrankin Posted July 10, 2019 Report Posted July 10, 2019 I think its BS that Hardrick gets a fine but no call on Harris having his helmet ripped off (What happened to the Eye in the Sky, Jake Ireland asleep?) Geebrr 1
Geebrr Posted July 10, 2019 Report Posted July 10, 2019 A fine? Yet Nick Usher is head shotting defenceless players every game and no suspension. Shoving = Head shots Mark F, Noeller and rebusrankin 3
Mr Dee Posted July 10, 2019 Author Report Posted July 10, 2019 Bob should be the next eye in the sky. He’s certainly qualified...he’s seen it all. Noeller 1
Nickthesizz Posted July 10, 2019 Report Posted July 10, 2019 20 minutes ago, Mr Dee said: Bob should be the next eye in the sky. He’s certainly qualified...he’s seen it all. I don't think Bob is looking for more work at this stage of his career.
Noeller Posted July 10, 2019 Report Posted July 10, 2019 21 minutes ago, Mr Dee said: Bob should be the next eye in the sky. He’s certainly qualified...he’s seen it all. plus, y'know, he's God, so.......#EyeInTheSky #IThinkThatsHowItWorks Mr Dee and Wideleft 1 1
Pete Catan's Ghost Posted July 10, 2019 Report Posted July 10, 2019 46 minutes ago, Noeller said: I'm curious -- are you also one of the ones who used to get mad at Wade Miller for taking ST offsides 15 years ago...? I'm equally curious. You sound like an expert on game strategy, so tell me what purpose a shove after the play in full view, that calls back a TD serves?
kelownabomberfan Posted July 10, 2019 Report Posted July 10, 2019 1 minute ago, Pete Catan's Ghost said: I'm equally curious. You sound like an expert on game strategy, so tell me what purpose a shove after the play in full view, that calls back a TD serves? there had been two late hits on Nichols prior to that play. I agree the timing of it wasn't exactly perfection, but it did achieve the purpose it was designed to do. Given none of us were in the trenches that night, we don't and never will know what was really going on, but I am willing to give Jemarcus the benefit of the doubt. bearpants, the watcher, BomberBall and 3 others 4 1 1
Pete Catan's Ghost Posted July 10, 2019 Report Posted July 10, 2019 (edited) 13 minutes ago, kelownabomberfan said: there had been two late hits on Nichols prior to that play. I agree the timing of it wasn't exactly perfection, but it did achieve the purpose it was designed to do. Given none of us were in the trenches that night, we don't and never will know what was really going on, but I am willing to give Jemarcus the benefit of the doubt. What purpose was it designed to serve? To a degree I agree with your line of thinking, but your argument is really just speculation. I love the player and I'm not saying that he should be fined. What I am saying is, he lost his composure and got caught. It was a bad penalty on his part. Edited July 10, 2019 by Pete Catan's Ghost
wbbfan Posted July 10, 2019 Report Posted July 10, 2019 10 minutes ago, kelownabomberfan said: there had been two late hits on Nichols prior to that play. I agree the timing of it wasn't exactly perfection, but it did achieve the purpose it was designed to do. Given none of us were in the trenches that night, we don't and never will know what was really going on, but I am willing to give Jemarcus the benefit of the doubt. How a couple of those hits, some spears, harris getting face masked soo hard they took his helmet off then hit him head to head, and the fisticuffs late in the game didnt end up with RBs being punished is beyond me. Hardricks fine was deserved.
Mr Dee Posted July 10, 2019 Author Report Posted July 10, 2019 👁🗨S p r e a d I n g the ball around. This is how I like an offence. Use all your receivers along with the strong running game. So far, veteran wide receiver Darvin Adams has been targeted 13 times and has eight catches. Meanwhile, newcomer Lucky Whitehead has been targeted 13 times for nine, Nic Demski 14 for nine, Drew Wolitarsky 12 for 9 and the combination of Chris Matthews, Kenny Lawler and Charles Nelson 11 for eight. The team leader in both categories is actually running back Andrew Harris, who has been targeted 15 times for 13 catches. - Ted Wyman Bigblue204, Noeller, Fred C Dobbs and 7 others 6 4
Noeller Posted July 10, 2019 Report Posted July 10, 2019 22 minutes ago, Pete Catan's Ghost said: What purpose was it designed to serve? To a degree I agree with your line of thinking, but your argument is really just speculation. I love the player and I'm not saying that he should be fined. What I am saying is, he lost his composure and got caught. It was a bad penalty on his part. I disagree vehemently that he lost his composure... sweep the leg and Geebrr 1 1
17to85 Posted July 10, 2019 Report Posted July 10, 2019 The other team wants to take liberties sometimes you gotta remind em that you play stupid games you win stupid prizes. This team isn't a bunch of doormats and I am OK with the occasional penalty to let the other team know they ain't gonna take **** from them. wbbfan, Eternal optimist and Noeller 2 1
BBRT Posted July 10, 2019 Report Posted July 10, 2019 (edited) 1 hour ago, Noeller said: I'm curious -- are you also one of the ones who used to get mad at Wade Miller for taking ST offsides 15 years ago...? Ah I remember the good ol Days when Wade would take the off sides. I think it was the only reason Coach Cal kept him around! He (Wade) was very good at getting off sides - made a career out of it! Edited July 10, 2019 by BBRT wbbfan and Fred C Dobbs 2
sweep the leg Posted July 10, 2019 Report Posted July 10, 2019 14 minutes ago, Noeller said: I disagree vehemently that he lost his composure... I don't think so either. Play wasn't completely over, so Hardrick kept giving him the business. I thought it was a weak call. BomberBall 1
JuranBoldenRules Posted July 10, 2019 Report Posted July 10, 2019 1 minute ago, sweep the leg said: I don't think so either. Play wasn't completely over, so Hardrick kept giving him the business. I thought it was a weak call. It was basically a pancake without the pancake. Actually quite reasonable between OL/DL. wbbfan 1
FrostyWinnipeg Posted July 10, 2019 Report Posted July 10, 2019 https://www.winnipegfreepress.com/sports/football/bombers/city-to-cut-ties-with-football-club-512507602.html Mayor Brian Bowman wants city hall to consider ending its ties with the Winnipeg Football Club and the public agency that owns its stadium. Bowman brought a motion to the executive policy committee Tuesday, calling on the administration to review all agreements with the CFL team and Triple B Stadium Inc. The mayor told reporters he doesn’t believe city hall should have a representative on the WFC board, adding it doesn’t have a similar arrangement with either the NHL’s Winnipeg Jets or the Winnipeg Goldeyes baseball team. He also wants to distance city property taxpayers from any liabilities to IG Field. "I’m not sure having political appointments on the board of a professional sports team makes sense at this stage," Bowman said. "If we can mitigate the financial risks of taxpayers going forward, that’s something I’d like to look at." The City of Winnipeg is one of three shareholders of Triple B Stadium Inc., along with the Winnipeg Football Club and University of Manitoba. Bowman cited the provincial auditor general’s investigation of the stadium deal, and the fact the provincial government had written off a $200-million loan related to it. EPC unanimously supported the proposal, directing the administration to prepare a report in 120 days reviewing all current agreements with the team and Triple B; and identifying steps to terminate representations with both and "steps necessary to potentially divest the City of Winnipeg of its membership interest in Triple B."
rebusrankin Posted July 10, 2019 Report Posted July 10, 2019 Just now, FrostyWinnipeg said: https://www.winnipegfreepress.com/sports/football/bombers/city-to-cut-ties-with-football-club-512507602.html Mayor Brian Bowman wants city hall to consider ending its ties with the Winnipeg Football Club and the public agency that owns its stadium. Bowman brought a motion to the executive policy committee Tuesday, calling on the administration to review all agreements with the CFL team and Triple B Stadium Inc. The mayor told reporters he doesn’t believe city hall should have a representative on the WFC board, adding it doesn’t have a similar arrangement with either the NHL’s Winnipeg Jets or the Winnipeg Goldeyes baseball team. He also wants to distance city property taxpayers from any liabilities to IG Field. "I’m not sure having political appointments on the board of a professional sports team makes sense at this stage," Bowman said. "If we can mitigate the financial risks of taxpayers going forward, that’s something I’d like to look at." The City of Winnipeg is one of three shareholders of Triple B Stadium Inc., along with the Winnipeg Football Club and University of Manitoba. Bowman cited the provincial auditor general’s investigation of the stadium deal, and the fact the provincial government had written off a $200-million loan related to it. EPC unanimously supported the proposal, directing the administration to prepare a report in 120 days reviewing all current agreements with the team and Triple B; and identifying steps to terminate representations with both and "steps necessary to potentially divest the City of Winnipeg of its membership interest in Triple B." Is he going to sever the relationship with True North or is he happy being their lapdog? wbbfan 1
Mr Dee Posted July 10, 2019 Author Report Posted July 10, 2019 When push comes to shove.. HARDRICK Tracker 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now