Wanna-B-Fanboy Posted July 1, 2019 Report Posted July 1, 2019 5 hours ago, TBURGESS said: Actually it's your bias that's showing. You're still equating QB play and wins as if they are the same thing. Wins are a team stat, not a QB stat. Reilly did more than enough to win. He had a great game. His team lost the game. I'd bet he looks at the 2 or 3 plays he could have done better and wishes he had a do over so his team could win. That's how good QB's see the game. I know right!? If only Reilly would have punched that goal line stance in for a TD.
Colin Unger Posted July 1, 2019 Report Posted July 1, 2019 2 hours ago, TBURGESS said: Without Whitehead, we lose. Then man am I glad we have him. Nickthesizz, Rod Black and Wanna-B-Fanboy 1 2
blueingreenland Posted July 1, 2019 Report Posted July 1, 2019 14 minutes ago, TBURGESS said: The first TD was a good pass. The second TD was all Lucky. And some good blocking, especially early in the play Mark F 1
Geebrr Posted July 1, 2019 Report Posted July 1, 2019 Nichols also got it out of his hands in almost no time and into Whitehead's hands. So quick that he did it without using the laces.
Tracker Posted July 1, 2019 Report Posted July 1, 2019 1 hour ago, Colin Unger said: Then man am I glad we have him. There is a rumour that Whitehead is sooo fast that he can turn off the light and be in bed asleep before the room gets dark. blue_gold_84, Mr Dee, blueingreenland and 1 other 2 2
Guest J5V Posted July 1, 2019 Report Posted July 1, 2019 1 hour ago, Tracker said: There is a rumour that Whitehead is sooo fast that he can turn off the light and be in bed asleep before the room gets dark.
Geebrr Posted July 2, 2019 Report Posted July 2, 2019 Willie Jefferson had a much better game than people think Bigblue204 1
Booch Posted July 2, 2019 Report Posted July 2, 2019 We were lucky to win because of lucky?? Last I checked he was a team member on the Bombers..no? And if he disnt score the second td on the 41 yard play..who says that means we weren't gonna score? The first td was a perfect deep shot. Second was out fast and on target..is it Nichols fault Lucky took it to the house and negated any additional completions and yards he may have gotten to fatten his stats? The TD to Harris too..perfectly executed play and toss..again..I guess that doesnt count either I guess...this argument is getting real dumb considering the winning percentage of team behind Nichols.. and sure not all wins on a QBs stat line should be totally a result of him..and same can be said about losses...and right now if out QB is giving us a chance to win while not playing reckless and doing things to constantly result in losses..then what's the argument?? Shuddop already blue_gold_84, Fan Boy, Bigblue204 and 3 others 3 3
Geebrr Posted July 2, 2019 Report Posted July 2, 2019 Willie Jefferson's film in the 2nd half is elite
blue_gold_84 Posted July 2, 2019 Report Posted July 2, 2019 18 hours ago, TBURGESS said: The first TD was a good pass. The second TD was all Lucky. Yeah, I guess those two passes just magically wound up in his hands. Why even roster a QB?
TBURGESS Posted July 2, 2019 Report Posted July 2, 2019 1 hour ago, blue_gold_84 said: Yeah, I guess those two passes just magically wound up in his hands. Why even roster a QB? It's not magic. Any competent QB makes those passes.
Booch Posted July 2, 2019 Report Posted July 2, 2019 19 minutes ago, TBURGESS said: It's not magic. Any competent QB makes those passes. no they don't...why even say things like that? Noeller and TBURGESS 1 1
NorthernSkunk Posted July 2, 2019 Report Posted July 2, 2019 Any "game manager" type QB would make those throws.
do or die Posted July 2, 2019 Report Posted July 2, 2019 15 hours ago, Geebrr said: Willie Jefferson had a much better game than people think 2nd half was good
Geebrr Posted July 2, 2019 Report Posted July 2, 2019 16 minutes ago, do or die said: 2nd half was good Very good. When they weren't running away from him they were rolling away from him, and, or using double/triple teams. Plus he got his hands up and disrupted a few key throws. He is going to get better and better Tracker and Fatty Liver 2
TBURGESS Posted July 2, 2019 Report Posted July 2, 2019 1 hour ago, Booch said: no they don't...why even say things like that? Of course they do. Why even argue about it?
bearpants Posted July 2, 2019 Report Posted July 2, 2019 On 2019-06-29 at 9:42 AM, TBURGESS said: Can we win a GC with Nichols? As long as the rest of the team plays great, yes. If we have to rely on Nichols to do something special, no. Tom Burgess wasn't a great QB who won a GC. He was an average, journeyman, game manager on a great team that won the GC.
SpeedFlex27 Posted July 2, 2019 Report Posted July 2, 2019 4 hours ago, Booch said: no they don't...why even say things like that? Because we all know who said it. Nickthesizz and blue_gold_84 2
Bigblue204 Posted July 2, 2019 Report Posted July 2, 2019 On 2019-07-01 at 12:04 PM, TBURGESS said: Without Whitehead, we lose. Can you send me some of whatever it is that you take, that allows you to see into different dimensions? Next you're going to say, without a football, we wouldn't be playing football. Or something magical like, Without IGF the Bombers would be playing somewhere else. Your insight is refreshing and delightful. Booch, Rod Black and Mr Dee 3
TBURGESS Posted July 2, 2019 Report Posted July 2, 2019 1 hour ago, Bigblue204 said: Can you send me some of whatever it is that you take, that allows you to see into different dimensions? Next you're going to say, without a football, we wouldn't be playing football. Or something magical like, Without IGF the Bombers would be playing somewhere else. Your insight is refreshing and delightful. Maybe you prefer... Without Lucky we lose. Without Nichols we still win. Better?
Bigblue204 Posted July 2, 2019 Report Posted July 2, 2019 Just now, TBURGESS said: Maybe you prefer... Without Lucky we lose. Without Nichols we still win. Better? Nope. It could just as easily been, without Lucky we win by 50. Cause his replacement would have been even more unstoppable. Without Nichols we win by 700023. There is no way to prove your statement or mine. Someone would have had to replace those two, they could very well have been the greatest football players ever. It's all hypothetical and makes for an invalid argument. Noeller, Geebrr, Rod Black and 3 others 4 1 1
Rod Black Posted July 2, 2019 Report Posted July 2, 2019 34 minutes ago, Bigblue204 said: Nope. It could just as easily been, without Lucky we win by 50. Cause his replacement would have been even more unstoppable. Without Nichols we win by 700023. There is no way to prove your statement or mine. Someone would have had to replace those two, they could very well have been the greatest football players ever. It's all hypothetical and makes for an invalid argument. Your stoic approach is preferred. Bigblue204 1
SpeedFlex27 Posted July 2, 2019 Report Posted July 2, 2019 50 minutes ago, TBURGESS said: Maybe you prefer... Without Lucky we lose. Without Nichols we still win. Better? I'm amazed you're still a fan of this team the way you blow farts out your ass. Noeller 1
Guest J5V Posted July 3, 2019 Report Posted July 3, 2019 3 hours ago, SpeedFlex27 said: I'm amazed you're still a fan of this team the way you blow farts out your ass. WHAT? He's a FAN of this team? There's no way!
Tracker Posted July 3, 2019 Report Posted July 3, 2019 45 minutes ago, J5V said: WHAT? He's a FAN of this team? There's no way! Those weren't farts- his butt was blowing kisses.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now