Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
20 minutes ago, Zontar said:

WPG.  Cruising alititude.

EDM. Inevitable egg laying.

MTL. Back in the race.  Khari is a difference maker.

OTT.  Key injuries don't help but they aren't scaring anybody soon.

SSK.  Feeling good about beating up BC is like saying you had a great cardio with treadmill set on "1".

TOR. Running out of adjectives. 

 

Poor BC doesn’t even get a takeaway 

Both Calgary and Hamilton  on bye week...

Edited by Floyd
Posted (edited)

Thing is, Toronto has looked okay for stretches -- they cut back on the self-owns, they could be alright.

I see no such hope for BC.

Edited by johnzo
Posted
8 minutes ago, johnzo said:

Thing is, Toronto has looked okay for stretches -- they cut back on the self-owns, they could be alright.

I see no such hope for BC.

Yeah I agree.... I know BC beat Toronto by one point but I definitely think Toronto is the better team.

Posted
10 hours ago, Mark H. said:

We will not work harder. Comrade Claybrooks is not the man. 

It's not a work ethic problem in BC, it's a talent problem. They have the worst OL and DL in the league by a country mile and both need a serious talent upgrade. Until then they will keep on losing. Football is won in the trenches.

Posted
2 minutes ago, gcn11 said:

It's not a work ethic problem in BC, it's a talent problem. They have the worst OL and DL in the league by a country mile and both need a serious talent upgrade. Until then they will keep on losing. Football is won in the trenches.

Plus the head coach is nothing short of terrible.

Posted
28 minutes ago, gcn11 said:

It's not a work ethic problem in BC, it's a talent problem. They have the worst OL and DL in the league by a country mile and both need a serious talent upgrade. Until then they will keep on losing. Football is won in the trenches.

Fair comment.  I just watch a D like ours fly to ball - BC is nowhere close to that. 

Posted
43 minutes ago, Bubba Zanetti said:

Yup, genius Hervey decided he'll just load up on offense and let Reilly throw the ball 50 times a game. Unfortunately Reilly and his 50/50 balls dont work when youre getting 2 steamboats.

To be fair, if their line was Figueroa-Foucault-Godber-Boyko-Johnson ... it 'should' be a different story - that being said everyone knew Figueroa was broken

 

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Brandon said:

At this point who could BC bring in for immediate  help?

Travis Bond and any other experienced Import O-lineman they can get their hands on, to hell with their ratio plan, they have an emergency situation they need to resolve.

Edited by Throw Long Bannatyne
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Brandon said:

At this point who could BC bring in for immediate  help?

They have the guys there already... just brought Harke in - he's no slouch

Harke-Foucault-Roy-Boyko-Norman - just deploy them properly

12 minutes ago, Throw Long Bannatyne said:

Travis Bond and any other experienced Import O-lineman they can get their hands on, to hell with their ratio plan, they have an emergency situation they need to resolve.

They're playing 9 Canadians right now... and leaving their best one - Junior Luke - in light rotation - so it could be 10 really

The other huge problem is that White and Rutley are not great blockers - that's why they never locked down elite status

And Carter is just not even trying so there's that...

Edited by Floyd
Posted

Bombers
Hard to find question marks. Great team depth.  D getting stingier, by the minute, O getting more dangerous, by the minute.  Nichols in a groove.

Hamilton
Hard hitting D and play makers on O.   We will find out more about them and the Bombers shortly

Calgary
Ok, didn't wow anybody against Hamilton, Bo still out.  So why do I have an uneasy feeling about them in November?

Edmonton
Pretty numbers....a gazillion sacks on D and big yards on O.   But have trouble putting up the TDs, and the D back 7 not that good

Montreal
K. Jones has tuned up the attitude, and will work with their young QB  Their D has improved incrementally every week.  Keep an eye on them.

Ottawa
D not that good to begin with.  Huge question marks at QB.  Not enough play makers on O.

Sask.
Have beat Toronto and BC.  Whatever.  Still question marks about QB, back 7 on D, coaching and team depth.   

TOR
Playing hard, but simply mistake prone in all phases of the game.  Finding various ways to lose.

BC.
Looks pretty bad, but upon a closer look....ok, still looks pretty bad.  Useless OL and D, soft physically, and disorganized everywhere. 

Posted
10 minutes ago, do or die said:

TOR
Playing hard, but simply mistake prone in all phases of the game.  Finding various ways to lose.

BC.
Looks pretty bad, but upon a closer look....ok, still looks pretty bad.  Useless OL and D, soft physically, and disorganized everywhere. 

You know times are tough when Sam Hurl would be an instant upgrade for both of these teams...

Posted
3 hours ago, Tracker said:

Plus the head coach is nothing short of terrible.

I think hat on sideways terrible works too. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...