Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

You'd think we'd use a lot more playaction to stunt pass rush and also get some shots downfield if they are there.  

Say that play where Whitehead comes across on a sweep they fake to him and pitch to Harris.  Run that same look but fake the pitch and have a couple vertical routes, maybe one to the post and one straight down the rail.

Posted
Just now, M.O.A.B. said:

The big question is how Lapo and Hall will adjust. Lately, they are bad at the start of the second half. 

Well maybe they can adjust by having Matty Thin Ice go downfield. Doubt he has 50 yards in the first half

Posted
Just now, BBRT said:

Well maybe they can adjust by having Matty Thin Ice go downfield. Doubt he has 50 yards in the first half

Lapo aint calling checkdowns

Posted
Just now, M.O.A.B. said:

The big question is how Lapo and Hall will adjust. Lately, they are bad at the start of the second half. 

I some times think, let the players figure it out. The coaches just **** them up.

Posted
1 minute ago, JuranBoldenRules said:

You'd think we'd use a lot more playaction to stunt pass rush and also get some shots downfield if they are there.  

Say that play where Whitehead comes across on a sweep they fake to him and pitch to Harris.  Run that same look but fake the pitch and have a couple vertical routes, maybe one to the post and one straight down the rail.

That's evil. Pure genius.

Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, M.O.A.B. said:

O'Shea need to remind Grant about ball security... "Hold to that ******* ball or else !!!!"

We are winning because of him and the D holding Calgary off. Our O is doing nothing. 

Nichols should be getting the "or else" statement

Edited by Goalie
Posted
1 minute ago, M.O.A.B. said:

O'Shea need to remind Grant about ball security... "Hold to that ******* ball or else !!!!"

Ball security has been the knock on Grant.

Posted
Just now, MOBomberFan said:

Matty was for sure pissed he couldn't get on the field for one last drive. Poor guy just couldn't get on the field. Two huge returns and a fumble will do that.

At this point its more likely the 0 goes 2 and out. 

Posted (edited)

What is our O supposed to do when they have two less possessions thanks to two great punt return TDs, a fumbled punt return, and Calgary had a seven minute drive? Two of our, what, four maybe? possessions have resulted in field goals and one should’ve been a touchdown on a perfect pass if not for the idiot refs. They’ve moved the ball well, only two bad plays, neither of which were Nichols’ fault: the blindside sack untouched and the Harris untouched hit on second and two. Handing it to Harris on that play is what EVERYONE here would want, the lack of a block isn’t Nichols or Lapos fault. Calgary has given up ONE play over 30 yards this season, so yeah, throwing deep balls probably isn’t the smartest move.

nichols hasn’t been good most of the year. Lapo has made some questionable calls this year. Our offence has struggled moving the ball at times this year. NONE of those things have been true today.

Give your damn heads a shake people. Jesus Christ this place is volatile and idiotic sometimes. 

Edited by O2L
Posted
2 minutes ago, Goalie said:

At this point its more likely the 0 goes 2 and out. 

It's probable even but we'll never know. I'll take 25 yards passing and 5 return tds if that's what Calgary feels like giving up

Posted

Now let's come out and kick the **** out of Calgary for 30 minutes and take this thing in a walk

Posted
1 minute ago, jazzsax said:

Matty gonna throw 220 yds in 2nd half to end at 299.

 

How do you figure that? Maybe Calgary D does not come out for the second half?  Would be nice but not something I would hang my hat on that's for sure.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...