Noeller Posted August 20, 2019 Author Report Posted August 20, 2019 ha ha I need to be talked off a ledge, but as much of a fan of Streveler as I am (seriously...) I just think he's going to have a world of trouble this week. Interceptions galore....D is going to do their part to keep things close, but the offense is gonna have a world of trouble, and people are going to realize how important Matt Nichols is. I dunno...just a gut feeling. I really want Streveler do do well, but I'm not sure the guy will be able to do it. 17to85 and Dodge and Burn 1 1
AKAChip Posted August 20, 2019 Report Posted August 20, 2019 And I believe that even if Streveler is mediocre, which is very possible, over the next six weeks we will realize how unimportant Matt Nichols is. I fully expect to lose to Edmonton, but I would have expected a loss in this game if Nichols were playing as well. I just hope we don’t jump to conclusions based on this one game. NorthernSkunk 1
Noeller Posted August 20, 2019 Author Report Posted August 20, 2019 2 minutes ago, AKAChip said: And I believe that even if Streveler is mediocre, which is very possible, over the next six weeks we will realize how unimportant Matt Nichols is. I fully expect to lose to Edmonton, but I would have expected a loss in this game if Nichols were playing as well. I just hope we don’t jump to conclusions based on this one game. yet after 5 games with offensive domination, we had a couple rough outings offensively, and everyone jumped all over Nichols........ Sard and JCon 2
AKAChip Posted August 20, 2019 Report Posted August 20, 2019 (edited) Sample size with Nichols being bad is much larger than Streveler being bad. He was terrible for the majority of last season and half of this season. It has been proven time and time again that the QB for this team needs to be merely average in order to win and that should be an achievable goal for Streveler regardless of the outcome this week. If he wins in Edmonton, I consider it a bonus. Edited August 20, 2019 by AKAChip wbbfan 1
rebusrankin Posted August 20, 2019 Report Posted August 20, 2019 Guys, did we give up when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor? JCon, Mark F, GCJenks and 7 others 1 9
JCon Posted August 20, 2019 Report Posted August 20, 2019 Just now, rebusrankin said: Guys, did we give up when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor? Nein! rebusrankin 1
Floyd Posted August 20, 2019 Report Posted August 20, 2019 10 minutes ago, rebusrankin said: Guys, did we give up when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor? Hell No!! rebusrankin and M.Silverback 2
baxter Posted August 20, 2019 Report Posted August 20, 2019 18 minutes ago, rebusrankin said: Guys, did we give up when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor? The Germans didn't bomb Pearl Harbor and we were not involved in any way. 66 Chevelle, NorthernSkunk and Bigblue204 3
17to85 Posted August 20, 2019 Report Posted August 20, 2019 2 minutes ago, baxter said: The Germans didn't bomb Pearl Harbor and we were not involved in any way. Bigblue204, BigBlueFanatic, bearpants and 2 others 5
Mark F Posted August 20, 2019 Report Posted August 20, 2019 (edited) Edited August 20, 2019 by Mark F Fatty Liver 1
rebusrankin Posted August 20, 2019 Report Posted August 20, 2019 12 minutes ago, baxter said: The Germans didn't bomb Pearl Harbor and we were not involved in any way. Noeller, GCJenks, 66 Chevelle and 2 others 3 2
Adrenaline_x Posted August 20, 2019 Report Posted August 20, 2019 (edited) Edited August 20, 2019 by Adrenaline_x bearpants and GCJenks 1 1
Adrenaline_x Posted August 20, 2019 Report Posted August 20, 2019 (edited) . Edited August 20, 2019 by Adrenaline_x
wbbfan Posted August 20, 2019 Report Posted August 20, 2019 59 minutes ago, Noeller said: yet after 5 games with offensive domination, we had a couple rough outings offensively, and everyone jumped all over Nichols........ Sts domination. And the offense converting from the oppositions side of the field. But still playing a half of football. Great teams beat adversity. This is a tough early test to see how great this team will be. Im hopefull. Bigblue204 1
JuranBoldenRules Posted August 20, 2019 Report Posted August 20, 2019 I'm less concerned with Streveler turning the ball over and more concerned about an ultra-conservative game plan. Streveler did not turn the ball over much last season when he started. The games he struggled were checkdown city. That's a philosophical issue with our offense no matter who our QB is. Our D and special teams are directly scoring almost a third of our points this season, so we have that to fall back on too. We've needed scores from them to win against the better teams we've beat. rebusrankin, Starman115, 17to85 and 1 other 2 2
SpeedFlex27 Posted August 20, 2019 Report Posted August 20, 2019 52 minutes ago, rebusrankin said: Guys, did we give up when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor? Slim Whitman knew he could single handedly kill every Martian.
SpeedFlex27 Posted August 20, 2019 Report Posted August 20, 2019 (edited) This is for Noeller. Never give up. Edited August 20, 2019 by SpeedFlex27
do or die Posted August 20, 2019 Report Posted August 20, 2019 59 minutes ago, baxter said: The Germans didn't bomb Pearl Harbor and we were not involved in any way. Fake news...
Noeller Posted August 20, 2019 Author Report Posted August 20, 2019 40 minutes ago, JuranBoldenRules said: I'm less concerned with Streveler turning the ball over and more concerned about an ultra-conservative game plan. Streveler did not turn the ball over much last season when he started. The games he struggled were checkdown city. That's a philosophical issue with our offense no matter who our QB is. Our D and special teams are directly scoring almost a third of our points this season, so we have that to fall back on too. We've needed scores from them to win against the better teams we've beat. I feel like he's turned it over this year when he's played and I also remember that after TC, we were saying how both Bennett and McGuire outplayed him for the #2. Now, I'm cheering hard for Streveler, and I'd love that he use these next several games to stake his claim to the #1 job and never give it back. Having said that, I just don't feel like he's gonna do it. Prove me wrong, Strevelation.....
blueingreenland Posted August 20, 2019 Report Posted August 20, 2019 14 minutes ago, Noeller said: we were saying how both Bennett and McGuire outplayed him for the #2. Now, I'm cheering hard for Streveler, and I'd love that he use these next several games to stake his claim to the #1 job and never give it back. Having said that, I just don't feel like he's gonna do it. Prove me wrong, Strevelation..... I think McGuire outplayed Streveler in pre-season. B-F-F-C 1
Arnold_Palmer Posted August 20, 2019 Report Posted August 20, 2019 2 hours ago, AKAChip said: And I believe that even if Streveler is mediocre, which is very possible, over the next six weeks we will realize how unimportant Matt Nichols is. I fully expect to lose to Edmonton, but I would have expected a loss in this game if Nichols were playing as well. I just hope we don’t jump to conclusions based on this one game. I actually believe the exact opposite. If Streveler is mediocre and were hovering around 500 we’ll realize how important Nichols really is. The man simply wins football games. Noeller 1
AKAChip Posted August 20, 2019 Report Posted August 20, 2019 (edited) 3 minutes ago, Arnold_Palmer said: I actually believe the exact opposite. If Streveler is mediocre and were hovering around 500 we’ll realize how important Nichols really is. The man simply wins football games. This concept is truly insane. If that is the end result, it will have everything to do with the cupcake schedule the Bombers had through nine weeks. Edited August 20, 2019 by AKAChip Sard 1
Noeller Posted August 20, 2019 Author Report Posted August 20, 2019 3 minutes ago, Arnold_Palmer said: I actually believe the exact opposite. If Streveler is mediocre and were hovering around 500 we’ll realize how important Nichols really is. The man simply wins football games. zaaaaaacklyyyyyy......
Noeller Posted August 20, 2019 Author Report Posted August 20, 2019 Just now, AKAChip said: This concept is truly insane. I was gonna say earlier that I actually think you might be unbalanced...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now