M.O.A.B. Posted August 31, 2019 Report Posted August 31, 2019 dont like that they dont have a backup RB. rebusrankin 1
kelownabomberfan Posted August 31, 2019 Report Posted August 31, 2019 11 minutes ago, M.O.A.B. said: dont like that they dont have a backup RB. Augustine gets hurt just put Strevs in at RB and McGuire at QB. blueingreenland 1
M.O.A.B. Posted August 31, 2019 Report Posted August 31, 2019 Just now, kelownabomberfan said: Augustine gets hurt just put Strevs in at RB and McGuire at QB. its that even allowed?
Eternal optimist Posted August 31, 2019 Report Posted August 31, 2019 1 hour ago, Throw Long Bannatyne said: Crap, they decided not to add Santiago. To me, this just further validates their plan to use Demski/Whitehead in unorthodox running patterns more often. Noeller 1
JuranBoldenRules Posted August 31, 2019 Report Posted August 31, 2019 That is an extremely thin offense. They have Grant too as a receiver, but they are basically a couple injuries away from having some very interesting decisions in terms of who does what. Could even see some guys from D go both ways. Eternal optimist 1
Fatty Liver Posted August 31, 2019 Report Posted August 31, 2019 53 minutes ago, M.O.A.B. said: ratio Don't think they need to do that, they already have Petermann, I guess if they lose an Import receiver they will use Grant.
Bubba Zanetti Posted August 31, 2019 Report Posted August 31, 2019 (edited) 1 hour ago, M.O.A.B. said: ratio I count 7 without him. Flexibility I suppose. Edited August 31, 2019 by Bubba Zanetti
JuranBoldenRules Posted August 31, 2019 Report Posted August 31, 2019 3 minutes ago, Bubba Zanetti said: I count 7 without him. Flexibility I suppose. Williams takes Harris' spot, Adams for Matthews. Need 21 NI's on roster. Crazy to me they don't dress the 3rd QB. What's the harm? If they lose both QB's at least they have someone to put out there. rebusrankin 1
NorthernSkunk Posted August 31, 2019 Report Posted August 31, 2019 The riders are gonna be so excited to shut down the run that Streveler an the offence are gonna light them up through the air.... Bigblue204 1
Booch Posted August 31, 2019 Report Posted August 31, 2019 I think Johnny is gonna open some eyes tomorrow.. LeBird, 17to85, Noeller and 2 others 3 2
VoR Posted August 31, 2019 Report Posted August 31, 2019 1 hour ago, M.O.A.B. said: its that even allowed? No Unless they've changed rule 6 section 4 article 4 Article 4 — Designated Quarterback Prior to the game, a team is required to designate three players who shall be permitted to alternate for each other during the game at the Quarterback position exclusively. Not more than one such player may be in the game at any time and none of the three can enter the game as a member of Team B.
SpeedFlex27 Posted August 31, 2019 Report Posted August 31, 2019 With small rosters & injuries they have this rule? If a backup qb can play RB then he should be allowed. But that would be too logical.
M.O.A.B. Posted August 31, 2019 Report Posted August 31, 2019 7 minutes ago, VoR said: No Unless they've changed rule 6 section 4 article 4 Article 4 — Designated Quarterback Prior to the game, a team is required to designate three players who shall be permitted to alternate for each other during the game at the Quarterback position exclusively. Not more than one such player may be in the game at any time and none of the three can enter the game as a member of Team B. yeah thought so
M.O.A.B. Posted August 31, 2019 Report Posted August 31, 2019 58 minutes ago, Bubba Zanetti said: I count 7 without him. Flexibility I suppose. ratio is not only about the 7 starters. but the overall composition of the roster. 21-Cdn, 20-Amer, 1 global
JuranBoldenRules Posted August 31, 2019 Report Posted August 31, 2019 10 minutes ago, SpeedFlex27 said: With small rosters & injuries they have this rule? If a backup qb can play RB then he should be allowed. But that would be too logical. It's so they can't dress another player as 3rd QB and use him elsewhere. Makes a lot of sense. Otherwise the Bombers could dress McCallister, play him at DE and insist he's the 3rd QB.
Eternal optimist Posted August 31, 2019 Report Posted August 31, 2019 6 minutes ago, VoR said: Article 4 — Designated Quarterback Prior to the game, a team is required to designate three players who shall be permitted to alternate for each other during the game at the Quarterback position exclusively. Not more than one such player may be in the game at any time and none of the three can enter the game as a member of Team B. Alright just to play devil's advocate here... couldn't they get around this rule by just listing Streveler at another position? List him at RB, then have him take snaps (no different than a direct snap to Harris, which sometimes is run)? Bigblue204 1
blueingreenland Posted August 31, 2019 Report Posted August 31, 2019 Santiago must feel pretty bummed out. No Way he's ever going to get onto this roster.
JuranBoldenRules Posted August 31, 2019 Report Posted August 31, 2019 1 minute ago, Eternal optimist said: Alright just to play devil's advocate here... couldn't they get around this rule by just listing Streveler at another position? List him at RB, then have him take snaps (no different than a direct snap to Harris, which sometimes is run)? Yeah but how would that benefit the Bombers? That means they have to sit another import.
rebusrankin Posted August 31, 2019 Report Posted August 31, 2019 I don't get why they didn't put Santiago on, take K.Jones off and then add D.Wright for Harris instead of Malcolm Williams. Gives you another running back and a NI to contribute on teams. Still allows you to use a DI on a DB and DE.
do or die Posted August 31, 2019 Report Posted August 31, 2019 Wanted to see Santiago and a 3 headed running attack...
Fatty Liver Posted August 31, 2019 Report Posted August 31, 2019 27 minutes ago, rebusrankin said: I don't get why they didn't put Santiago on, take K.Jones off and then add D.Wright for Harris instead of Malcolm Williams. Gives you another running back and a NI to contribute on teams. Still allows you to use a DI on a DB and DE. I know, no sense trying to fool anybody, Bombers win this game on the run or they don't win at all. The more running weapons they can throw at the Riders the better. Mark F and rebusrankin 2
Noeller Posted August 31, 2019 Report Posted August 31, 2019 1 minute ago, Throw Long Bannatyne said: I know, no sense trying to fool anybody, Bombers win this game on the run or they don't win at all. The more running weapons they can throw at the Riders the better. I don't know that that's necessarily true.... I've been a vocal critic of Streveler as a passer but last year vs Mtl, he lit em up through the air. He CAN do it and we've got guys that can get open if there's a lot of man coverage... NorthernSkunk 1
blueingreenland Posted August 31, 2019 Report Posted August 31, 2019 Anybody know if the Bombers still stay at the SPA in Moose Jaw...or in Regina? Milt was on the radio in SK yesterday talking about the days the Bombers stayed in Regina and some stupid Rider fans woke up Milt and Khari at 3 a.m. and they never got back to sleep and the Bombers got blown out so coach Ritchie said "No more of that. We're going to Moose Jaw from now on."
pigseye Posted August 31, 2019 Report Posted August 31, 2019 So Adams & Williams are in for Mathews....I'd take that trade off any day.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now