iHeart Posted November 2, 2019 Report Posted November 2, 2019 Jets are 7-7-0 Vegas is 8-5-1 game time is at 9 and I'm assuming is on one of the Sportsnets
FrostyWinnipeg Posted November 2, 2019 Report Posted November 2, 2019 1 hour ago, iHeart said: Jets are 7-7-0 Vegas is 8-5-1 game time is at 9 and I'm assuming is on one of the Sportsnets Jets should be rested after last nights game
Goalie Posted November 2, 2019 Report Posted November 2, 2019 1 and 3 Road or 2-2. Heritage was a home game. 2 and 2 seems unlikely as the Jets absolutely suck in Vegas.
captaincanuck12 Posted November 3, 2019 Report Posted November 3, 2019 Thankfully we have Lowry back. D corps the same. If we play as bad as we did last night... We will get annihilated. Hopefully some better defensive play tonight.
iHeart Posted November 3, 2019 Author Report Posted November 3, 2019 (edited) Sportsnet needs to really turn off their mics during anthems, and this is not the start I was hoping for Edited November 3, 2019 by iHeart
bb1 Posted November 3, 2019 Report Posted November 3, 2019 Same defense that got killed yesterday..and he drops one of our best player( Roslo) to the third line..breaking up him and Ethlers. SMH. Maurice is so damn stubborn. Poolman is a turnstile out there...Dahlstrom was not getting beat like a rented mule out there but he sits.
FrostyWinnipeg Posted November 3, 2019 Report Posted November 3, 2019 (edited) So does GG get a call from the league for turning Reaves into a center? Edited November 3, 2019 by FrostyWinnipeg AB BomberFan and bb1 2
FrostyWinnipeg Posted November 3, 2019 Report Posted November 3, 2019 23 minutes ago, iHeart said: and the injury bug lingers Need another defenseman put on waivers 🤪 rebusrankin 1
iHeart Posted November 3, 2019 Author Report Posted November 3, 2019 (edited) 3-2 come on jets tie this up you pulled off miracles before you can do it again and there we go, thanks KConn Edited November 3, 2019 by iHeart
FrostyWinnipeg Posted November 3, 2019 Report Posted November 3, 2019 (edited) Can’t believe we got a point out of this game after the way we played the first. And now OVERTIME! Edited November 3, 2019 by FrostyWinnipeg blue_gold_84 1
iHeart Posted November 3, 2019 Author Report Posted November 3, 2019 hooo boy did we ever need that The Unknown Poster 1
pigseye Posted November 3, 2019 Report Posted November 3, 2019 Two gutsy wins in a row, great job Jets. The game seemed to turn after the fight and Poolman injury, maybe they're on to something. bb1 1
Goalie Posted November 4, 2019 Report Posted November 4, 2019 (edited) The fight due to the extremely clean hit by Lowry woke them up. What a goal in OT tho. Laine and Connor work well together. Connor Scheif Laine likely be a damn strong line. Much better effort tonight by the Jets tho. It appeared 55 and 26 might be starting to care Edited November 4, 2019 by Goalie
FrostyWinnipeg Posted November 4, 2019 Report Posted November 4, 2019 (edited) +/- after 15 games Pionk +7 Morrissey -12 Edited November 4, 2019 by FrostyWinnipeg blue_gold_84 and Brandon 2
blue_gold_84 Posted November 4, 2019 Report Posted November 4, 2019 16 hours ago, FrostyWinnipeg said: +/- after 15 games Pionk +7 Morrissey -12 Okay... And?
Brandon Posted November 4, 2019 Report Posted November 4, 2019 6 minutes ago, blue_gold_84 said: Okay... And? That's bad
FrostyWinnipeg Posted November 4, 2019 Report Posted November 4, 2019 6 minutes ago, blue_gold_84 said: Okay... And? Just the stats ma'am, just the stats. Though i did hear the morning show guys on 1290 saying Morrissey not have good start.
blue_gold_84 Posted November 4, 2019 Report Posted November 4, 2019 3 minutes ago, Brandon said: That's bad Of course it is. +/- does little to paint any kind of clear or accurate picture, though. 1 minute ago, FrostyWinnipeg said: Just the stats ma'am, just the stats. Though i did hear the morning show guys on 1290 saying Morrissey not have good start. Well, no. It was just one, generally useless stat you posted. And what's with the ma'am BS?
FrostyWinnipeg Posted November 4, 2019 Report Posted November 4, 2019 Just now, blue_gold_84 said: Of course it is. +/- does little to paint any kind of clear or accurate picture, though. Well, no. It was just one, generally useless stat you posted. And what's with the ma'am BS? vadeux 1
FrostyWinnipeg Posted November 5, 2019 Report Posted November 5, 2019 Apparently Morrissey's +/- got the attention of the FP scribe as it is top story in Sports today. Personally I dont think Morrissey is playing like he has the 3rd worst +/- in the league but it's noticeable to a bunch of peeps.
Goalie Posted November 5, 2019 Report Posted November 5, 2019 1 hour ago, FrostyWinnipeg said: Apparently Morrissey's +/- got the attention of the FP scribe as it is top story in Sports today. Personally I dont think Morrissey is playing like he has the 3rd worst +/- in the league but it's noticeable to a bunch of peeps. Its a useless stat. You get a minus if u are on the ice when a goal is scored against you. So.. Lets do an example to prove @blue_gold_84 point. Kulikov goes to change lets say since hes lhd 2. So.. He makes a change.. Maybe when he shouldnt be, josh steps on the ice, hes not involved in the play yet tho.. Other team scores.. -1 for Josh... Kuli the guy who made the bad change leading to scoring chance is on the bench so he gets no minus or plus. Misleading weak ""stat""
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now