Mr Dee Posted March 3, 2020 Report Posted March 3, 2020 rebusrankin, GCJenks, Bigblue204 and 5 others 7 1
Bigblue204 Posted March 3, 2020 Report Posted March 3, 2020 12 hours ago, Tiny759 said: Fair but we can still appreciate the origins of the game but change rules that don’t apply as much to football. If it wasn’t for changing rules we wouldn’t have the game we love today. That was my second point in the post you quoted. The entire point of football, is to get the ball into the endzone. Missing a field goal still does that.
Bigblue204 Posted March 3, 2020 Report Posted March 3, 2020 7 hours ago, Tiny759 said: Obviously you hope for 7 but when you go to kick a field goal, the drive technically isn’t over. But why should missing a kick give a point? I find it silly. Because the entire point of football is to get the ball into the end zone. Missing the field goal does that.
BomberfanMKS Posted March 3, 2020 Report Posted March 3, 2020 1 hour ago, Bigblue204 said: Because the entire point of football is to get the ball into the end zone. Missing the field goal does that. Also incentives the opposing team to try and run the ball out of the endzone on a missed but not through field goal attempt. Bigblue204, BigBlueFanatic and GCJenks 2 1
Stickem Posted March 3, 2020 Report Posted March 3, 2020 (edited) 14 hours ago, Jacquie said: It's Larry and his brother Darryl and his other brother Darryl. Yes but I was referring to the family from Sask. .. Both families are related.....in more ways than one...A lot of Darryl's but we're having trouble getting the one we're interested in (apparently) to sign on the dotted line Edited March 3, 2020 by Stickem
bearpants Posted March 3, 2020 Report Posted March 3, 2020 19 hours ago, Mr Dee said: 🤓 Best response so far: I'm not necessarily in favour of removing the rouge... but this is a terrible analogy... the equivalent would be giving a team automatic points for dropping a TD pass... MC and Dirty30 2
BBlink Posted March 3, 2020 Report Posted March 3, 2020 16 minutes ago, bearpants said: I'm not necessarily in favour of removing the rouge... but this is a terrible analogy... the equivalent would be giving a team automatic points for dropping a TD pass... Thank you. People come up with some pretty terrible analogies. And even worse are people that accept them as logical proof. "YASSSSSSS"
Mr Dee Posted March 3, 2020 Report Posted March 3, 2020 36 minutes ago, bearpants said: ..the equivalent would be giving a team automatic points for dropping a TD pass... No.
sweep the leg Posted March 3, 2020 Report Posted March 3, 2020 I'm fully on board with getting rid of the singles for bad punts and missed fgs.
Geebrr Posted March 3, 2020 Report Posted March 3, 2020 2 minutes ago, sweep the leg said: I'm fully on board with getting rid of the singles for bad punts It can be called the "Jon Ryan" rule. Bigblue204, Noeller and JCon 3
TBURGESS Posted March 3, 2020 Report Posted March 3, 2020 I like the single points as they make things interesting. I also like the run backs from the end zone on missed FG's. You'd lose both if a missed FG didn't result in any points. Personally, I wouldn't want to lose either, but I understand the idea that missing a FG being seen as rewarding failure, especially when it happens on a 20 yard try. I'd change the rule to no point if the ball goes through the end zone without being touched. That keeps the run backs and the 1 point while eliminating the point for shorter missed FG's. BigBlueFanatic, Tiny759 and Yourface 1 2
Fan Boy Posted March 3, 2020 Report Posted March 3, 2020 8 minutes ago, TBURGESS said: I like the single points as they make things interesting. I also like the run backs from the end zone on missed FG's. You'd lose both if a missed FG didn't result in any points. Personally, I wouldn't want to lose either, but I understand the idea that missing a FG being seen as rewarding failure, especially when it happens on a 20 yard try. I'd change the rule to no point if the ball goes through the end zone without being touched. That keeps the run backs and the 1 point while eliminating the point for shorter missed FG's. There is some point there. The point is not for missing a field goal by the way. The point is for not allowing the opposition to take the ball out of their endzone. When you look at it this way you are not rewarding failure. rebusrankin 1
Tiny759 Posted March 3, 2020 Report Posted March 3, 2020 4 hours ago, Bigblue204 said: Because the entire point of football is to get the ball into the end zone. Missing the field goal does that. So going by that logic, can a team bomb a throw into the end zone? The ball made it into the end zone right? I saw someone talk about only single point if the player receives the missed field goal in the end zone and doesn’t return it out and I agree with that, but one that misses and goes right through, I find it silly to reward them with a point.
Tracker Posted March 3, 2020 Report Posted March 3, 2020 Quote Quote Good to see D30 back in the land of the living.
SpeedFlex27 Posted March 3, 2020 Report Posted March 3, 2020 6 minutes ago, Tiny759 said: So going by that logic, can a team bomb a throw into the end zone? The ball made it into the end zone right? Stickem, BigBlueFanatic and J5V 1 2
Tiny759 Posted March 3, 2020 Report Posted March 3, 2020 6 minutes ago, SpeedFlex27 said: Read the context of the reply
Firekid Posted March 3, 2020 Report Posted March 3, 2020 (edited) So going by that logic, can a team bomb a throw into the end zone? The ball made it into the end zone right? Edited March 3, 2020 by Firekid SpeedFlex27 and bearpants 2
Tiny759 Posted March 3, 2020 Report Posted March 3, 2020 31 minutes ago, Firekid said: So going by that logic, can a team bomb a throw into the end zone? The ball made it into the end zone right? Once again read the context of the reply.
Stickem Posted March 3, 2020 Report Posted March 3, 2020 2 hours ago, Firekid said: So going by that logic, can a team bomb a throw into the end zone? The ball made it into the end zone right? he had me at 'bomb' a throw J5V 1
BBlink Posted March 3, 2020 Report Posted March 3, 2020 4 hours ago, TBURGESS said: I like the single points as they make things interesting. I also like the run backs from the end zone on missed FG's. You'd lose both if a missed FG didn't result in any points. Personally, I wouldn't want to lose either, but I understand the idea that missing a FG being seen as rewarding failure, especially when it happens on a 20 yard try. I'd change the rule to no point if the ball goes through the end zone without being touched. That keeps the run backs and the 1 point while eliminating the point for shorter missed FG's. I was thinking that it could be a single point if the ball lands in play. So the punter could dribble the ball over the goaline and go through the endzone, but the ball would have to touch at some point. It could really add some fun moments.
wbbfan Posted March 3, 2020 Report Posted March 3, 2020 9 hours ago, Mr Dee said: Thats really cool, I hope I can find some streams to check out some of their games. Imo, the only rogue that is bad is on a missed fg.
Noeller Posted March 3, 2020 Report Posted March 3, 2020 Rouge: French for "Red", also a single point in Canadian Football Rogue: To go against the rules. See: "Going rogue"....
JCon Posted March 3, 2020 Author Report Posted March 3, 2020 2 minutes ago, Noeller said: Rogue: To go against the rules. See: "Going rogue".... Or...
JCon Posted March 3, 2020 Author Report Posted March 3, 2020 5 minutes ago, Noeller said: ******* nerds... BigBlueFanatic and SpeedFlex27 1 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now