Brandon Posted January 24, 2020 Report Posted January 24, 2020 Nelson was a better returner then Whitehead and had better hands at receiver. Maybe and hopefully Whitehead wasn't used properly and he can become our own Banks (minus the whining) Colin Unger 1
Jacquie Posted January 24, 2020 Report Posted January 24, 2020 3 hours ago, Noeller said: ******* Colin.... Ridiculous take, as always. Whitehead was so excited at GC, going around and talking to all the fans after the game. He's excited to be a Bomber. If they want him back, he'll be back. Whitehead isn't a potential free agent so if they didn't want him they likely would have released by now. TBURGESS 1
wbbfan Posted January 24, 2020 Report Posted January 24, 2020 5 hours ago, Brandon said: Nelson was better then Whitehead... that being said I'd like to see Whitehead get a 2nd chance with Pierce as the OC. Very different guys. Nelson is smart, tough, and a hard nosed running. North south guy who always gets you some thing positive. Whitehead is lightning in a bottle. He could score any time he touches the ball. He could also fumble, stumble, or completely miss read his blocks and take it out side for little to nothing when he had good yards up the middle. Its kinda like blinks returning vs stokes. But we dont have to pick one or the other any time soon. Both will be in camp and have a chance to make the team maybe even get serious wr reps. They could even both be rostered (though not likely) and split the field. Whitehead on one side forces the cover team to be much wider and leave more lanes for nelson. Some thing we did a good bit last year. Im very happy to have them both in blue too.
Geebrr Posted January 24, 2020 Report Posted January 24, 2020 Nelson is too slow and a dime a dozen returner. BBlink and Bigblue204 2
Brandon Posted January 24, 2020 Report Posted January 24, 2020 Aside from the one great TD from Whitehead, I can't remember seeing him do absolutely anything else during the regular season. MC and Mark F 1 1
Mark F Posted January 24, 2020 Report Posted January 24, 2020 (edited) 8 minutes ago, Brandon said: Aside from the one great TD from Whitehead, I can't remember seeing him do absolutely anything else during the regular season. He had a nice short sideline pass that he ran about fifty yards for a td. Then they used that play about five hundred times, to the point where a fan watching on tv knew it was coming. but they kept running it. and it kept not working. Edited January 24, 2020 by Mark F Bigblue204 and Tracker 1 1
JuranBoldenRules Posted January 24, 2020 Report Posted January 24, 2020 1 hour ago, Geebrr said: Nelson is too slow and a dime a dozen returner. Disagree. He was quite good on punts. Not all going to be big returns or TD's. He was reliable which is key. Grant is better especially if he comes back having worked on ball control and snagging punts. Nelson also brings a lot of value with his work covering kicks as a DI/extra import if we keeping rolling with 8 Canadian starters. Noeller and Colin Unger 2
JuranBoldenRules Posted January 24, 2020 Report Posted January 24, 2020 8 hours ago, wbbfan said: Very different guys. Nelson is smart, tough, and a hard nosed running. North south guy who always gets you some thing positive. Whitehead is lightning in a bottle. He could score any time he touches the ball. He could also fumble, stumble, or completely miss read his blocks and take it out side for little to nothing when he had good yards up the middle. Its kinda like blinks returning vs stokes. But we dont have to pick one or the other any time soon. Both will be in camp and have a chance to make the team maybe even get serious wr reps. They could even both be rostered (though not likely) and split the field. Whitehead on one side forces the cover team to be much wider and leave more lanes for nelson. Some thing we did a good bit last year. Im very happy to have them both in blue too. Whitehead can't catch punts so being a returner in the CFL is basically an impossibility for him. He will have to make it as a receiver. Noeller 1
Wideleft Posted January 24, 2020 Report Posted January 24, 2020 Not going to get into a who is better argument, but Whitehead's life history has shown that he's a guy who's shown perseverance over some pretty crazy circumstances. There seems to be zero evidence that he's a guy who just won't show up. Mark F, Noeller and BBlink 3
Floyd Posted January 24, 2020 Report Posted January 24, 2020 If only there was some way to settle this debate, like a couple weeks before the season where we actually get to see the guys under contract on the field... comedygeek, GCJenks and wbbfan 2 1
GCn20 Posted January 24, 2020 Report Posted January 24, 2020 What is wrong with signing a guy, who performed well for us before injury, to come to camp and try earn a job? I don't think anyone is handing a job to Charles Nelson, but signing him to come in and compete is a good move. He may be among the first cuts in TC, or maybe he comes in and steals a job...he's capable of either. Bigblue204 and Floyd 2
Geebrr Posted January 24, 2020 Report Posted January 24, 2020 2 hours ago, JuranBoldenRules said: Disagree. He was quite good on punts. Not all going to be big returns or TD's. He was reliable which is key. Grant is better especially if he comes back having worked on ball control and snagging punts. Nelson also brings a lot of value with his work covering kicks as a DI/extra import if we keeping rolling with 8 Canadian starters. Nelson has played in 4 games over 2 years.
JuranBoldenRules Posted January 24, 2020 Report Posted January 24, 2020 44 minutes ago, Geebrr said: Nelson has played in 4 games over 2 years. And he's got 600 combined yards and 4 special teams tackles in those games. What's the problem? Bigblue204, Mark F and Piggy 1 3
Mark F Posted January 24, 2020 Report Posted January 24, 2020 (edited) 1 hour ago, Floyd said: If only there was some way to settle this debate, like a couple weeks before the season where we actually get to see the guys under contract on the field... https://www.wikihow.com/Become-a-Curmudgeon Edited January 24, 2020 by Mark F Noeller, GCJenks, Floyd and 1 other 1 3
Tiny759 Posted January 24, 2020 Report Posted January 24, 2020 1 hour ago, Geebrr said: Nelson has played in 4 games over 2 years. So last year he had a season ending injury. It happens. The year before that. He was on the pr bcuz he was a rookie to the cfl.
Geebrr Posted January 24, 2020 Report Posted January 24, 2020 4 hours ago, JuranBoldenRules said: And he's got 600 combined yards and 4 special teams tackles in those games. What's the problem? Meh. I don't see the reason for the hype JCon 1
Geebrr Posted January 24, 2020 Report Posted January 24, 2020 3 hours ago, Tiny759 said: So last year he had a season ending injury. It happens. The year before that. He was on the pr bcuz he was a rookie to the cfl. Meh TBURGESS 1
Colin Unger Posted January 25, 2020 Report Posted January 25, 2020 20 hours ago, Noeller said: ******* Colin.... Ridiculous take, as always. Whitehead was so excited at GC, going around and talking to all the fans after the game. He's excited to be a Bomber. If they want him back, he'll be back. Im not looking at the person when I say he seems like the type. I'm looking at the big picture. He's a guy who spent significant time in the NFL and he was good enough to be an NFL return guy before he was met with misfortune. He's currently #2 or #3 on the returner depth chart in Winnipeg. That's all i'm looking at here. He's a candidate to give up. He will have to come into camp and show some things he wasn't capable of last year in order to have a chance to crack the roster. Save for an injury Grant is the primary return guy. Am I wrong?
Tiny759 Posted January 25, 2020 Report Posted January 25, 2020 1 hour ago, Geebrr said: Meh Is what it is. That explains the 5 games in two years. But you’re allowed To have an opinion on him. Worst case it provides competition in training camp
BBlink Posted January 25, 2020 Report Posted January 25, 2020 12 minutes ago, Colin Unger said: Im not looking at the person when I say he seems like the type. I'm looking at the big picture. He's a guy who spent significant time in the NFL and he was good enough to be an NFL return guy before he was met with misfortune. He's currently #2 or #3 on the returner depth chart in Winnipeg. That's all i'm looking at here. He's a candidate to give up. He will have to come into camp and show some things he wasn't capable of last year in order to have a chance to crack the roster. Save for an injury Grant is the primary return guy. Am I wrong? Yup Noeller 1
17to85 Posted January 25, 2020 Report Posted January 25, 2020 18 minutes ago, Colin Unger said: Am I wrong? Usually. Noeller, bigg jay, Colin Unger and 1 other 1 1 2
SpeedFlex27 Posted January 25, 2020 Report Posted January 25, 2020 1 hour ago, Colin Unger said: Im not looking at the person when I say he seems like the type. I'm looking at the big picture. He's a guy who spent significant time in the NFL and he was good enough to be an NFL return guy before he was met with misfortune. He's currently #2 or #3 on the returner depth chart in Winnipeg. That's all i'm looking at here. He's a candidate to give up. He will have to come into camp and show some things he wasn't capable of last year in order to have a chance to crack the roster. Save for an injury Grant is the primary return guy. Am I wrong? Give it up, Colin. You're calling him a quitter. Noeller 1
Colin Unger Posted January 25, 2020 Report Posted January 25, 2020 30 minutes ago, SpeedFlex27 said: Give it up, Colin. You're calling him a quitter. I’m saying we will find out what he’s made of.
SpeedFlex27 Posted January 25, 2020 Report Posted January 25, 2020 29 minutes ago, Colin Unger said: I’m saying we will find out what he’s made of. It makes no sense.
kelownabomberfan Posted January 25, 2020 Report Posted January 25, 2020 29 minutes ago, Colin Unger said: I’m saying we will find out what he’s made of. I had myself tested once, turns out I'm mostly made of bacon grease and methane. tacklewasher, Tracker and J5V 1 2
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now