SpeedFlex27 Posted April 4, 2020 Report Posted April 4, 2020 12 hours ago, 17to85 said: #LapoProblems. Exactly. We'll see Arbuckle turn into the exact same qb as Nichols under LaPolice.
SpeedFlex27 Posted April 4, 2020 Report Posted April 4, 2020 2 hours ago, Brandon said: Prove me wrong? How come Nichols isn't back and was replaced by a guy with only a few starts with our team? Yep, cut your first Grey Cup winning qb in 29 years. See ya, Zack. Thanks for stopping by. blue_gold_84 1
17to85 Posted April 4, 2020 Report Posted April 4, 2020 12 hours ago, Floyd said: Lapo and Nichols are Game Managers together... Richie Hall was a bum until we had WillieJ and Bighill - maybe Lapo and Nichols win the lottery too Ritchie Hall adapted. That's the big difference. Yes he got a talent upgrade, but he also made some changes. Hall was never a guy afraid of adjusting, he just really did get a bit passive at times, but was capable of adjusting. Lapo never changed. Tracker 1
NorthernSkunk Posted April 4, 2020 Report Posted April 4, 2020 1 hour ago, 17to85 said: Ritchie Hall adapted. That's the big difference. Yes he got a talent upgrade, but he also made some changes. Hall was never a guy afraid of adjusting, he just really did get a bit passive at times, but was capable of adjusting. Lapo never changed. In one sense I am glad lapo never changed because we finally got the cup.
Dr Zaius Posted April 4, 2020 Report Posted April 4, 2020 (edited) 21 hours ago, 17to85 said: the more time he gets with a qb the lower their numbers get. How many times to I have to explain these things to you people? You watch, Ottawa is going to be a team that barely loses most of their games cause that's the Lapo way. He's not a new entity in the CFL, He's been doing his thing since 2002. We've seen it time and time again. I 100% agree this is going to happen. Lapo loved to make every game come down to the last 3 minutes with a 50/50 chance at winning. Ottawa is going to win 6-7 games, lots of their losses are going to be under 5 points giving everyone feign hope. People will say it's the beginning of a turnaround, but it won't happen. Although I'm also of the opinion Nichols couldn't navigate the pocket and had a popgun arm with no mobility and couldn't hit anyone in 10-15 yards. I'm playing both sides of the argument so I always come out on top. Edited April 4, 2020 by Dr Zaius
SpeedFlex27 Posted April 4, 2020 Report Posted April 4, 2020 7 hours ago, 17to85 said: Ritchie Hall adapted. That's the big difference. Yes he got a talent upgrade, but he also made some changes. Hall was never a guy afraid of adjusting, he just really did get a bit passive at times, but was capable of adjusting. Lapo never changed. Coaches make names for themselves because they have the talent around them to execute their systems & win. Coaches that don't, lose.
Eternal optimist Posted August 4, 2020 Report Posted August 4, 2020 Man, I miss the days when our biggest problem in the world was Matt Nichols not throwing for 300 yards. Mr Dee, Bubba Zanetti and JCon 1 2
Mark H. Posted August 5, 2020 Report Posted August 5, 2020 5 hours ago, Eternal optimist said: Man, I miss the days when our biggest problem in the world was Matt Nichols not throwing for 300 yards. I’d pay $$ to see a check down to Harris right now... Eternal optimist, Bubba Zanetti, Noeller and 5 others 2 4 2
Eternal optimist Posted August 6, 2020 Report Posted August 6, 2020 22 hours ago, Mark H. said: I’d pay $$ to see a check down to Harris right now... I have so many questions on this response.... 1. When did we start Harris at LB in this scenario? 2. Is it still a check down if the pass from Nichols is intercepted by a former teammate? 3. Who are you paying in this scenario? The Argos, Nichols (bribing), the Bombers? Me?
Mark H. Posted August 6, 2020 Report Posted August 6, 2020 1 hour ago, Eternal optimist said: I have so many questions on this response.... 1. When did we start Harris at LB in this scenario? 2. Is it still a check down if the pass from Nichols is intercepted by a former teammate? 3. Who are you paying in this scenario? The Argos, Nichols (bribing), the Bombers? Me? Yes. Eternal optimist 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now