Mark F Posted February 17, 2020 Report Share Posted February 17, 2020 rebusrankin, Noeller, bearpants and 1 other 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eternal optimist Posted February 17, 2020 Report Share Posted February 17, 2020 Sure, he's a dynamic player, but can Walker block? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rebusrankin Posted February 17, 2020 Report Share Posted February 17, 2020 the watcher, wbbfan, 17to85 and 1 other 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wbbfan Posted February 17, 2020 Report Share Posted February 17, 2020 17 minutes ago, Eternal optimist said: Sure, he's a dynamic player, but can Walker block? He doesn't need to be a great blocker. He's such a threat you're better off sending him deep and having him run off 2 defenders rather then trying to have him man block one guy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brandon Posted February 17, 2020 Report Share Posted February 17, 2020 I think we end up with Roosevelt or Arceneaux on the cheap Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpeedFlex27 Posted February 17, 2020 Report Share Posted February 17, 2020 19 minutes ago, Eternal optimist said: Sure, he's a dynamic player, but can Walker block? That kind of remark reminds me of a very old commercial from the 1960's that I remember as a kid. Microwaves were just coming out back then in the middle of the decade & a sales person was showing a group of people in a department store how microwaves can speed up cooking time. After the demonstration, everyone was so impressed by how fast it cooked. The salesman started taking orders from the audience until one guy yelled out, "But can it brown???' Apparently, this microwave in the commercial could. Most microwaves couldn't. Walker will get paid whether he blocks or not just like microwaves kept on selling even if they couldn't brown. NorthernSkunk and Tracker 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geebrr Posted February 17, 2020 Report Share Posted February 17, 2020 5 minutes ago, Brandon said: I think we end up with Roosevelt or Arceneaux on the cheap For what? JCon 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Booch Posted February 17, 2020 Report Share Posted February 17, 2020 1 minute ago, Geebrr said: For what? No ****..that would pointless.. JCon, rebusrankin, TBURGESS and 1 other 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jpan85 Posted February 17, 2020 Report Share Posted February 17, 2020 Yeah you would be bette4 off then going for a Armanti Edwards or Rodney Smith then. M.O.A.B., Bigblue204, rebusrankin and 1 other 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rebusrankin Posted February 17, 2020 Report Share Posted February 17, 2020 If we're trying to land guys on the cheap, put me in the Edwards/Smith camp over two aging, declining vets like Manny and Roosevelt. That would be like Adarius Bowman/Chris Mathews Redux. Bigblue204, Mr Dee and Mark F 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Dee Posted February 17, 2020 Report Share Posted February 17, 2020 . J5V, the watcher, rebusrankin and 5 others 8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stickem Posted February 17, 2020 Report Share Posted February 17, 2020 (edited) 29 minutes ago, Mr Dee said: . Does Bob know something we don't......??????hmmmmm Edited February 17, 2020 by Stickem Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nolby Posted February 17, 2020 Report Share Posted February 17, 2020 1 hour ago, Brandon said: I think we end up with Roosevelt or Arceneaux on the cheap I'll take Roosevelt over arceneaux Tracker 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brandon Posted February 17, 2020 Report Share Posted February 17, 2020 1 hour ago, Geebrr said: For what? Roosevelt for 1000 yard season and clutch 2nd down production. Arecenaux for TCF. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nolby Posted February 17, 2020 Report Share Posted February 17, 2020 1 minute ago, Brandon said: Roosevelt for 1000 yard season and clutch 2nd down production. Arecenaux for TCF. Besides,arceneaux has mush brain after Loffler introduced himself to Manny. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blueandgold Posted February 17, 2020 Report Share Posted February 17, 2020 1 hour ago, Jpan85 said: Yeah you would be bette4 off then going for a Armanti Edwards or Rodney Smith then. Definitely. Give me Edwards or Rhymes as a secondary option. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M.O.A.B. Posted February 17, 2020 Report Share Posted February 17, 2020 (edited) reading between the lines... i think Walker will sign with the Bombers Edited February 17, 2020 by M.O.A.B. Tracker, the watcher and J5V 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geebrr Posted February 17, 2020 Report Share Posted February 17, 2020 1 hour ago, Booch said: No ****..that would pointless.. I'd rather roll with what we have, definitely. rebusrankin and Noeller 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geebrr Posted February 17, 2020 Report Share Posted February 17, 2020 5 minutes ago, Brandon said: Roosevelt for 1000 yard season and clutch 2nd down production. Arecenaux for TCF. No to both from me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rebusrankin Posted February 17, 2020 Report Share Posted February 17, 2020 Roosevelt hasn't been a 1000 yard receiver since 2017. If we don't land Walker, I'd rather add Smith and Edwards, who are younger or just go with some of the newcomers that we have signed. Geebrr 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geebrr Posted February 17, 2020 Report Share Posted February 17, 2020 Just now, M.O.A.B. said: reading between the lines... i think Walker will sign with tge Bombers What lines? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Dee Posted February 17, 2020 Report Share Posted February 17, 2020 11 minutes ago, Blueandgold said: Definitely. Give me Edwards or Rhymes as a secondary option. No way. Keep them on offence. J5V, BomberBall and bearpants 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tracker Posted February 17, 2020 Report Share Posted February 17, 2020 15 minutes ago, rebusrankin said: Roosevelt hasn't been a 1000 yard receiver since 2017. If we don't land Walker, I'd rather add Smith and Edwards, who are younger or just go with some of the newcomers that we have signed. Roosevelt has had the misfortune to have some genuinely bad quarterbacks but if he can come close to his previous (2017) form, he is worth a look. But I would rather have Rhymes who did well with even worse quarterbacks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brandon Posted February 18, 2020 Report Share Posted February 18, 2020 4 hours ago, rebusrankin said: Roosevelt hasn't been a 1000 yard receiver since 2017. If we don't land Walker, I'd rather add Smith and Edwards, who are younger or just go with some of the newcomers that we have signed. Lol he had 946 yards last season. Our leading receiver last season was Lawler with 637 and Adams with 549. Tiny759 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goalie Posted February 18, 2020 Report Share Posted February 18, 2020 Its Walker or nobody imo. And im leaning towards nobody every day that passes and hes not signed. Roosevelt? Arceneaux? WTF is the point. From Walker to 2 dudes who combined dont play 18 games a season? Yea i dont see Kyle and Crew going after injury prone old dudes. Fatty Liver and BBlink 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now