Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
10 minutes ago, FrostyWinnipeg said:

330m sounds like really cheap. 

 

Sounds like an estimate that will easily double. No way you can replace the Arlington Bridge for $330M. 

Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, FrostyWinnipeg said:

Rather take that 330 and put it towards the football stadium retractable roof :)

 

Put it towards moving the rail yards out the city and then... u can probably put a ton of housing there 

 

Rarely to never use it... not in years.  It's not really necessary 

Edited by Goalie
Posted

It would be a sweet spot for Said low income housing. 

I'd look at doing some in the downtown region off portage maybe near u of w or between there and polo since low income housing probably shouldn't wait 

Posted
On 2023-11-22 at 2:30 PM, Goalie said:

Put it towards moving the rail yards out the city and then... u can probably put a ton of housing there 

 

Rarely to never use it... not in years.  It's not really necessary 

I believe the estimate to move the rail yards was in the billions... I'm not sure how many, but it would take a lot to make that move happen.

Posted
23 hours ago, Sard said:

I believe the estimate to move the rail yards was in the billions... I'm not sure how many, but it would take a lot to make that move happen.

Despite the cost it is the right answer. 3 or 4 Billion to move it now or 700 Million for Arlington Bridge and then 1.5B for Slaw Rebchuk and on and on in to the future. The possible economic boon from the area currently covered by the rail yard was estimated at 4 or 5 times the cost of moving it (if my memory is correct). How many housing units could be built on that land (after remediation) and the societal gains from removing the division between the North and the rest of the city would have a value as well, but I have no idea how to place an amount on it.

We need to get past doing the cheapest right now and start doing the best for ever solution.

 

 

Posted
3 hours ago, FrostyWinnipeg said:

Or property tax the ship out of the rail yards to help build a new bridge.

CP Rail could fight that as predatory in the courts. We need to work with them to move those rail yards. 

400 acres in the middle of city could create a lot more property tax revenue if it wasn't all industrial. 

Posted
11 minutes ago, JCon said:

CP Rail could fight that as predatory in the courts. We need to work with them to move those rail yards. 

400 acres in the middle of city could create a lot more property tax revenue if it wasn't all industrial. 

It could rejuvenate the area and really clean it up.   

A lot of really bad/sad things happen around those tracks and under the bridge.      

Posted
7 hours ago, GCJenks said:

On the same weekend the Globe and Mail rates us Third most livable city in the country...

Getting ranked 3rd overall is pretty impressive considering they has us at 422th (out of 439) for climate.  We must have done really well in the other categories!

Posted

I find Winnipeg to be for the most part a very safe city, much like other cities they are circumstances that have manifested and left to fester in certain parts of the city and no one has any solutions to solve many of the cities problems .

Posted
3 hours ago, bigg jay said:

Getting ranked 3rd overall is pretty impressive considering they has us at 422th (out of 439) for climate.  We must have done really well in the other categories!

3rd overall and 1st for raising a family, pretty proud of the city I moved out of to live in the country… (I don’t feel it is hypocritical, more ironic really)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...