JCon Posted September 11, 2021 Report Posted September 11, 2021 (edited) It's here! It's game day! Edited September 11, 2021 by JCon Mark F, Starman115, HardCoreBlue and 2 others 5
Nolby Posted September 11, 2021 Report Posted September 11, 2021 (edited) Here we ****** GO!!!!!Gonna be ultra loud and a beauty of a day.GO BOMBERS GO!!!!!!!!! Edited September 11, 2021 by Nolby JCon, Mark F and Starman115 2 1
JCon Posted September 11, 2021 Author Report Posted September 11, 2021 Weather at kickoff will be 19, with winds 24kms/h gusting to 36kms/h. A lovely afternoon for football! Stickem, Noeller, Nolby and 1 other 2 2
Noeller Posted September 11, 2021 Report Posted September 11, 2021 (edited) It's anotha muthaf***in game day, *******! Let's f***in go!! Edited September 11, 2021 by Noeller Geebrr 1
Booch Posted September 11, 2021 Report Posted September 11, 2021 That's an fugly Sask depth chart...we should be ashamed if we lose to that Mark H., TBURGESS, Tracker and 1 other 4
Super Duper Negatron Posted September 11, 2021 Report Posted September 11, 2021 LMAO off at Leonard's excuse for not submitting a urine sample. And Dickenson defending him!
stevethe3rd Posted September 11, 2021 Report Posted September 11, 2021 As a rider fan, this may be a hard one to watch. Wanna-B-Fanboy 1
Geebrr Posted September 11, 2021 Report Posted September 11, 2021 6 minutes ago, Super Duper Negatron said: LMAO off at Leonard's excuse for not submitting a urine sample. And Dickenson defending him! Yeah what a bullshit explanation
Dr Zaius Posted September 11, 2021 Report Posted September 11, 2021 woke up, crushed the gym, crushed 3 caesars negating the workout and staring at the clock to meet my buddies at the tailgate at 1 p.m. lets. ****ing. go MOBomberFan, Bigblue204, Eternal optimist and 6 others 5 4
BattleLevel Posted September 11, 2021 Report Posted September 11, 2021 I’m so ready to see Willie, Jackson and the rest of the boys tear through the Riders line like Kleenex! rebusrankin, Rod Black and Noeller 3
Rod Black Posted September 11, 2021 Report Posted September 11, 2021 29 minutes ago, Super Duper Negatron said: LMAO off at Leonard's excuse for not submitting a urine sample. And Dickenson defending him! 2 games suspended for “I couldn’t make pee pee” is cheaper than 4 games for juicing. Super Duper Negatron, Tracker and Bigblue204 1 2
MOBomberFan Posted September 11, 2021 Report Posted September 11, 2021 1 minute ago, Rod Black said: 2 games suspended for “I couldn’t make pee pee” is cheaper than 4 games for juicing. I believe first time violators only get 2 game suspensions. Glad he got the max suspension for a first time violation, but next time he says he can't pee I hope the penalty increases or this will be a bad precedent to set Rod Black 1
Rod Black Posted September 11, 2021 Report Posted September 11, 2021 (edited) I could actually believe a player if he said he couldn’t give a pee pee sample because he would be embarrassed that he ate asparagus before the game. Edited September 11, 2021 by Rod Black wbbfan, Mark H., Nolby and 1 other 4
Eternal optimist Posted September 11, 2021 Report Posted September 11, 2021 41 minutes ago, Rod Black said: 2 games suspended for “I couldn’t make pee pee” is cheaper than 4 games for juicing. Imagine being so bad you have to juice up to record 2 defensive tackles and get spanked by your rivals in your own barn last week lol. Tracker 1
HardCoreBlue Posted September 11, 2021 Report Posted September 11, 2021 1 hour ago, Super Duper Negatron said: LMAO off at Leonard's excuse for not submitting a urine sample. And Dickenson defending him! Yikes, as Doug Brown says, makes you wonder what they would have found. Mark F, Noeller and Geebrr 1 1 1
JCon Posted September 11, 2021 Author Report Posted September 11, 2021 I want to go now! Can't wait. Is it game time yet?? Mark F and Stickem 1 1
Dodge and Burn Posted September 11, 2021 Report Posted September 11, 2021 CF will be peeing enough today for AC's next two tests. 17to85 and Rod Black 1 1
Pete Catan's Ghost Posted September 11, 2021 Report Posted September 11, 2021 I've tested hundreds of individuals through my workplace over the years. Invariably they are dirty when they use the can't pee defence. What they don't mention in the article is whether the CFL mandates that the player be witnessed while urinating (to eliminate using a concealed sample in a eyedrop bottle or "Whizzinator" for example).... which can lead to the "shy bladder" argument. Of course this only flys for so long before nature insists. You also don't need that much pee to test. It's still a bizarre situation, as any adulterant in the sample won't disappear in the short number of hours that would pass before any healthy individual would need to urinate. Its almost as if they think the tester will forget about the test. Ha Albertabomberguy, Rod Black, Bigblue204 and 1 other 3 1
Mark F Posted September 11, 2021 Report Posted September 11, 2021 (edited) re...Cadwallader " Though little is known about the historical Cadwaladr, he became a mythical redeemer figure in Welsh culture. He is a prominent character in the romanticstories of Geoffrey of Monmouth, where he is portrayed as the last in an ancient line to hold the title King of Britain. " descended from a king. put him in! 1 hour ago, Rod Black said: 2 games suspended for “I couldn’t make pee pee” is cheaper than 4 games for juicing. from my childhood, I remember " mum, I havta" , opposite problem. hopping around holding private parts. Edited September 11, 2021 by Mark F Rod Black 1
Rod Black Posted September 11, 2021 Report Posted September 11, 2021 9 minutes ago, Pete Catan's Ghost said: I've tested hundreds of individuals through my workplace over the years. Invariably they are dirty when they use the can't pee defence. What they don't mention in the article is whether the CFL mandates that the player be witnessed while urinating (to eliminate using a concealed sample in a eyedrop bottle or "Whizzinator" for example).... which can lead to the "shy bladder" argument. Of course this only flys for so long before nature insists. You also don't need that much pee to test. It's still a bizarre situation, as any adulterant in the sample won't disappear in the short number of hours that would pass before any healthy individual would need to urinate. Its almost as if they think the tester will forget about the test. Ha I did not know this. Thank you. Pete Catan's Ghost 1
Bigblue204 Posted September 11, 2021 Report Posted September 11, 2021 36 minutes ago, Pete Catan's Ghost said: I've tested hundreds of individuals through my workplace over the years. Invariably they are dirty when they use the can't pee defence. What they don't mention in the article is whether the CFL mandates that the player be witnessed while urinating (to eliminate using a concealed sample in a eyedrop bottle or "Whizzinator" for example).... which can lead to the "shy bladder" argument. Of course this only flys for so long before nature insists. You also don't need that much pee to test. It's still a bizarre situation, as any adulterant in the sample won't disappear in the short number of hours that would pass before any healthy individual would need to urinate. Its almost as if they think the tester will forget about the test. Ha About a month ago I went for a blood test, and completely forgot about the urine sample too. I had emptied the old bladder at home a few times cause I didn't want to use the bathroom in the clinic and knew I'd be waiting for a while....they then told me they wanted two urine samples. It took me a minute but I got it done. He's 100% hiding something. Tracker 1
Rod Black Posted September 11, 2021 Report Posted September 11, 2021 He’s dirty. Another example of not being able to keep up with the Champions. Fake can’t pee pee. Fake injuries before the snap. Just like the banjo pickin inbreds. Scum and dumb. Pukey, bleh. Filthy.
TrueBlue4ever Posted September 11, 2021 Report Posted September 11, 2021 (edited) It is strange for him to withhold, since he knows the penalty is the same. And it’s not like a DUI where you refuse to blow and get the same charge as if you blew over .08. In that case, a higher reading (more than double) automatically becomes aggravating at sentencing, so I am aware of cops who say if they were to get caught under suspicion of driving drunk, always blow if you think you are under or on the line, but absolutely refuse if you know you are going over, to avoid the extra punishment of a super high reading. Since there is no extra suspension derived from higher amounts in the system, why avoid the test? Unless he wanted to go the Andrew Harris route of “only trace amounts, so I can claim inadvertent tainted supplement with plausible deniability”, and figured recent usage would make that claim more dubious than it already is. Edited September 11, 2021 by TrueBlue4ever
Noeller Posted September 11, 2021 Report Posted September 11, 2021 Super Duper Negatron, Tracker, Mark F and 1 other 4
Pete Catan's Ghost Posted September 11, 2021 Report Posted September 11, 2021 (edited) It could also depend on how many different panels you are using (types of drug groups you are testing for), because very broad testing can be quite expensive. Cocaine, Cannabis, Benzos, Amphetamines, and Opiates are types of panels. For example, I would not be testing all football players across the board for opiate use as many would come back positive due to the Rx pain killers that many are on. (There are many types of opiates and certain panels could show up positive for opiates whether the individual shot Heroin, ate too much poppeyseed loaf, or used Rx oxycontin) I also may not test for Cannabis if it wasn't explicitly prohibited as a PED because I may not want to open that can of worms (since many players smoke weed and it is now legal.) Different companies/groups have different rules. The CFL, addictions treatment centres, and even the Federal Dept. of Transport have different dos and don'ts. for their employees. I have no idea what type or number of panels you would need for PEDs. I'm guessing it is quite extensive. Edited September 11, 2021 by Pete Catan's Ghost
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now