Nolby Posted October 15, 2021 Report Posted October 15, 2021 Win and youre in,let's crush em tonight, boys!!!!GO BOMBERS GO!!! Bigblue204, wbbfan and JCon 3
JCon Posted October 15, 2021 Report Posted October 15, 2021 (edited) Who? The Champs @ The L'ks (Thanks Noeller!) What? Smash Mouth Football When? Tonight @ 8pm Central - 7pm Covidtown Where? Mostly empty, Commonwealth Stadium, Edmonton Why? The Gods bestowed football on us and we shall play Injury report: https://www.goelks.com/injury-report/ Stanley Bryant Jr's 100th game as a Bomber! Do you agree with Ed Tait? Get fired UP!!!! 3 STORYLINES | WPG AT EDM by Ed Tait 1. ENCORE, ENCORE 2. KICKING CONCERNS 3. POUND ALONG THE GROUND Edited October 15, 2021 by JCon blue_gold_84, Bigblue204, BBlink and 1 other 3 1
Mark H. Posted October 15, 2021 Report Posted October 15, 2021 100 high calibre games at the OT position is bloody amazing. Eternal optimist, Bigblue204, M.Silverback and 7 others 5 5
M.O.A.B. Posted October 15, 2021 Report Posted October 15, 2021 https://www.goelks.com/2021/10/14/derel-walker-october-14/
BBlink Posted October 15, 2021 Report Posted October 15, 2021 With Tyrell coming off the roster, you have to expect the Bombers will be keeping that starting american (Hardrick) on the offensive side of the ball. So I see McKnight getting some plays tonight. blue_gold_84, Bigblue204, JCon and 1 other 3 1
M.O.A.B. Posted October 15, 2021 Report Posted October 15, 2021 16 minutes ago, BBlink said: With Tyrell coming off the roster, you have to expect the Bombers will be keeping that starting american (Hardrick) on the offensive side of the ball. So I see McKnight getting some plays tonight. We are starting 2 Canadian receivers (Demski and Woli) but McKnight will be in the lineup as the backup receiver. You don't want to go the game without one. If an American receiver goes down he will sub in. If any of Demski or Woli goes down, we go 4-Americans. Bigblue204 and BBlink 2
Noeller Posted October 15, 2021 Report Posted October 15, 2021 Just wanted to mention that a few missed the memo that it's now L'ks.........just so you know......... #ThingsThatMatter BBlink, Stickem, Wanna-B-Fanboy and 3 others 1 1 4
wbbfan Posted October 15, 2021 Report Posted October 15, 2021 2 hours ago, M.O.A.B. said: We are starting 2 Canadian receivers (Demski and Woli) but McKnight will be in the lineup as the backup receiver. You don't want to go the game without one. If an American receiver goes down he will sub in. If any of Demski or Woli goes down, we go 4-Americans. cant replace an NI with a DI. If one goes down then we see a lot of Hback and TE heavy run sets. Probably a lot of MIller at Hback moving around blocking and more harris in the flats.
17to85 Posted October 15, 2021 Report Posted October 15, 2021 2 minutes ago, wbbfan said: cant replace an NI with a DI. If one goes down then we see a lot of Hback and TE heavy run sets. Probably a lot of MIller at Hback moving around blocking and more harris in the flats. But if we are starting more than the minimum number of Canadians we get an American on the roster as a backup who isn't a DI correct?
M.O.A.B. Posted October 15, 2021 Report Posted October 15, 2021 (edited) 3 minutes ago, wbbfan said: cant replace an NI with a DI. If one goes down then we see a lot of Hback and TE heavy run sets. Probably a lot of MIller at Hback moving around blocking and more harris in the flats. I believe you can if you are starting 8 Canadians. which we are 4OL, 2WR, 1RB and 1DT. Edited October 15, 2021 by M.O.A.B. Bigblue204 1
wbbfan Posted October 15, 2021 Report Posted October 15, 2021 Just now, 17to85 said: But if we are starting more than the minimum number of Canadians we get an American on the roster as a backup who isn't a DI correct? Previously you got an extra DI, it wasnt an american none counter. This year its different.
Bigblue204 Posted October 15, 2021 Report Posted October 15, 2021 9 minutes ago, wbbfan said: cant replace an NI with a DI. If one goes down then we see a lot of Hback and TE heavy run sets. Probably a lot of MIller at Hback moving around blocking and more harris in the flats. You can as long as there are still 7 cnd starters. Bombers start 8. They'll be fine if one goes down and an import steps in.
wbbfan Posted October 15, 2021 Report Posted October 15, 2021 9 minutes ago, Bigblue204 said: You can as long as there are still 7 cnd starters. Bombers start 8. They'll be fine if one goes down and an import steps in. The rule book has no provisions for allowing a DI to replace an extra NI. Previously starting an extra NI gave you an extra DI. https://cfldb.ca/rulebook/scrimmage/player-restrictions/#r4s5a5 Article 6 — Designated International If a team is using its full complement of international players, it shall, prior to the game, designate four international players as special teams players, who shall be permitted to enter the game at another position, only on the understanding that another international player on that side of the ball is required to leave the game for that play. Such player may enter the game on an unrestricted basis, only if another international player is removed for the balance of the game. If a designated international participates in the game illegally: PENALTY: L25 PLS DR or L25 PBD or option.
JuranBoldenRules Posted October 15, 2021 Report Posted October 15, 2021 38 minutes ago, wbbfan said: Previously you got an extra DI, it wasnt an american none counter. This year its different. Rule has always been the same. Don’t get too hung up on the depth chart. The only players they declare are the DI’s and QB’s. Yes we will have one American “backup” who is not a DI who can sub in for anyone because we’ll have up to 7 Canadians on O most of the time when we are only required 6. Bigblue204 1
Bigblue204 Posted October 15, 2021 Report Posted October 15, 2021 16 minutes ago, wbbfan said: The rule book has no provisions for allowing a DI to replace an extra NI. Previously starting an extra NI gave you an extra DI. https://cfldb.ca/rulebook/scrimmage/player-restrictions/#r4s5a5 Article 6 — Designated International If a team is using its full complement of international players, it shall, prior to the game, designate four international players as special teams players, who shall be permitted to enter the game at another position, only on the understanding that another international player on that side of the ball is required to leave the game for that play. Such player may enter the game on an unrestricted basis, only if another international player is removed for the balance of the game. If a designated international participates in the game illegally: PENALTY: L25 PLS DR or L25 PBD or option. Isn't that regarding the replacement of one of the starting 7. We start 8...that 8th player can be replaced by an International.
M.O.A.B. Posted October 15, 2021 Report Posted October 15, 2021 (edited) 21 minutes ago, wbbfan said: The rule book has no provisions for allowing a DI to replace an extra NI. Previously starting an extra NI gave you an extra DI. https://cfldb.ca/rulebook/scrimmage/player-restrictions/#r4s5a5 Article 6 — Designated International If a team is using its full complement of international players, it shall, prior to the game, designate four international players as special teams players, who shall be permitted to enter the game at another position, only on the understanding that another international player on that side of the ball is required to leave the game for that play. Such player may enter the game on an unrestricted basis, only if another international player is removed for the balance of the game. If a designated international participates in the game illegally: PENALTY: L25 PLS DR or L25 PBD or option. this rule is pertaining to the four DI. read it again. Edited October 15, 2021 by M.O.A.B.
Wanna-B-Fanboy Posted October 15, 2021 Report Posted October 15, 2021 Are we so bored of a dominant winning football team that we have devolved into arguing about National, Americans, Canadians, DIs, OLs, WRs, RBs, DTs, DUIs ... We got an awesome game coming up! Win and We're in! We get to watch our D, DOMINATE the L"ks and hopefully see our Offense pick up where they left off!!!! WOO HOO GAME DAY BABY!!! Rod Black and Nolby 2
JCon Posted October 15, 2021 Report Posted October 15, 2021 9 minutes ago, wanna-b-fanboy said: Are we so bored of a dominant winning football team that we have devolved into arguing about National, Americans, Canadians, DIs, OLs, WRs, RBs, DTs, DUIs ... I think it has more to do with the whole rule itself, how it's implemented and how it changes so frequently. Noeller 1
Noeller Posted October 15, 2021 Report Posted October 15, 2021 I went cross-eyed trying to understand the DI rules in this thread.......... Bigblue204 and JCon 2
O2L Posted October 15, 2021 Report Posted October 15, 2021 For L’ks sake, these rules are L’king confusing! JCon and Noeller 1 1
Eternal optimist Posted October 15, 2021 Report Posted October 15, 2021 The real question is what is the signal for Illegal Participation by a Designated International and has it ever actually been called.
JCon Posted October 15, 2021 Report Posted October 15, 2021 2 minutes ago, Eternal optimist said: The real question is what is the signal for Illegal Participation by a Designated International and has it ever actually been called. Eternal optimist and bigg jay 2
TrueBlue4ever Posted October 15, 2021 Report Posted October 15, 2021 33 minutes ago, wanna-b-fanboy said: Are we so bored of a dominant winning football team that we have devolved into arguing about National, Americans, Canadians, DIs, OLs, WRs, RBs, DTs, DUIs ... We got an awesome game coming up! Win and We're in! We get to watch our D, DOMINATE the L"ks and hopefully see our Offense pick up where they left off!!!! WOO HOO GAME DAY BABY!!! As was said before, people need something to complain about around here, and now Rod Black is also off that list. Wanna-B-Fanboy 1
Eternal optimist Posted October 15, 2021 Report Posted October 15, 2021 4 minutes ago, TrueBlue4ever said: As was said before, people need something to complain about around here, and now Rod Black is also off that list. He WAS the worst though. coach17, JCon and Tracker 3
TrueBlue4ever Posted October 15, 2021 Report Posted October 15, 2021 Just now, Eternal optimist said: He WAS the worst though. I thought Glen Suitor was the worst. Rod Black, AB BomberFan and Wanna-B-Fanboy 1 1 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now