Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, Bomber_fanaddict said:

22,900ish

Wow nice. Dunno if u guys know this but plus 14 in November in Winnipeg? Wtf is this? 3 years ago. Pretty much since the weather appears to be quite cyclical 

Edited by Goalie
Posted
3 minutes ago, Bubba Zanetti said:

Guys, guys, everyone just settle down now. We shouldnt be too happy about this win. According to posters at riderfans the refs handed us the game with a bunch of missed/non calls against us. Sorry to be the bearer of bad news.

Bradbury had a nice game, 280 yards/2 TDs and no interceptions.

Posted
6 minutes ago, Bubba Zanetti said:

Guys, guys, everyone just settle down now. We shouldnt be too happy about this win. According to posters at riderfans the refs handed us the game with a bunch of missed/non calls against us. Sorry to be the bearer of bad news.

Is that why we won? I missed that part.

Posted (edited)

"Stanback almost has 100 yards against that defence, but against us we for the most part controlled him. What does that say? "

Right from RF. Are they saying that because they kept Stanback to lower rushing yards that their defense is superior now? Let's meet at the flagpole and see how it goes.

Edited by Nolby
Posted
1 minute ago, Nolby said:

"Stanback almost has 100 yards against that defence, but against us we for the most part controlled him. What does that say? "

Right from RF. Are they saying that because they kept Stanback to lower rushing yards that they're defense is superior now? Let's meet at the flagpole and see how it goes.

Fan delusions won’t help the Riders during the playoffs…. I almost encourage it - makes the tears juicier

Posted
3 minutes ago, Nolby said:

"Stanback almost has 100 yards against that defence, but against us we for the most part controlled him. What does that say? "

Right from RF. Are they saying that because they kept Stanback to lower rushing yards that their defense is superior now? Let's meet at the flagpole and see how it goes.

Take out his 1 big run and he had a much worse night. Guy like that will make those plays every now n then. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Nolby said:

"Stanback almost has 100 yards against that defence, but against us we for the most part controlled him. What does that say? "

Right from RF. Are they saying that because they kept Stanback to lower rushing yards that their defense is superior now? Let's meet at the flagpole and see how it goes.

Als had a much worse QB against Riders.  Easier to focus on Stanback when the passing threat is reduced.

Posted
2 minutes ago, BigBlueFanatic said:

Fan delusions won’t help the Riders during the playoffs…. I almost encourage it - makes the tears juicier

I kinda hope its them against us in the wf. Would love to smash them again give up no tds again and watch cf hit the cross bar again. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, rebusrankin said:

I for one am worried about Patrick Levels and how he'll sleep tonight after losing to a team that the Als are better than.

So does Tony Washington claim he did his job tonight since the sacks came mainly from the inside? 

Levels said we haven't beaten anyone good.  I guess he can be content knowing we still haven't.

Posted
4 hours ago, wbbfan said:

Cmon bombers kick some als ass

Wonder how many butts in the seats look good

Als running a lot of heavy set 

Just shy of 23,000... not bad considering November and a Jets game at the same time.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Mark H. said:

And - same old story with Trevor Harris - plays pretty well but folds in the clutch - Doug B. was thesaurusising about him

Reeeeeeallly doesn't like the guy...... 

Posted
1 hour ago, Bomber_fanaddict said:

I said right from the start it sounded like they pumped in a bunch of fan noise. It sounded super strange in the seats this game. Like way louder than normal for what appeared to be a lot less people.  

I didn't think so, thought the crowd was just really into it.  I also heard a lot of noise coming from the corner where there was a large group of military.  They were having a good time over there.

Posted
1 hour ago, Nolby said:

"Stanback almost has 100 yards against that defence, but against us we for the most part controlled him. What does that say? "

Right from RF. Are they saying that because they kept Stanback to lower rushing yards that their defense is superior now? Let's meet at the flagpole and see how it goes.

the-last-jedi-salt.gif

 

so angry that they aren't at the same calibre as Winnipeg.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...