rebusrankin Posted January 7, 2022 Report Posted January 7, 2022 Maybe Zach takes less to keep the team together, example a raise to $450,000 from $410,000 instead of going for $500,000. wbbfan and Noeller 1 1
CodyT Posted January 7, 2022 Report Posted January 7, 2022 11 minutes ago, Rich said: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Grey_Cup_champions Queens University 1922 - 1924 Toronto Argonauts 1945 - 1947 Edmonton Eskimos 1954 - 1956 Edmonton Eskimos 1978 - 1982 (5 in a row) So basically it hasn't been done in 40 years. Would be pretty incredible.. could you imagine in Regina. LOL. One can dream.
Noeller Posted January 7, 2022 Report Posted January 7, 2022 8 minutes ago, Goldkobra said: Back to back. We're all talking about 3 peats... Nobody's mentioned repeats. That's old news. Geebrr, JCon, Stickem and 3 others 1 5
JCon Posted January 7, 2022 Author Report Posted January 7, 2022 32 minutes ago, Noeller said: We're all talking about 3 peats... Nobody's mentioned repeats. That's old news. Repeats are sooooooo 2021. Jesse, Noeller, BigBlueFanatic and 2 others 1 4
Goldkobra Posted January 7, 2022 Report Posted January 7, 2022 49 minutes ago, Noeller said: We're all talking about 3 peats... Nobody's mentioned repeats. That's old news. CodyT Side note-- how many teams have won back to back to back championships in cfl history? He legit asked about back to back.
Noeller Posted January 7, 2022 Report Posted January 7, 2022 Just now, Goldkobra said: CodyT Side note-- how many teams have won back to back to back championships in cfl history? He legit asked about back to back. Dude.... Reading comprehension: "Back To Back To Back" = Three Peat CodyT, Geebrr, GCJenks and 1 other 4
Pete Catan's Ghost Posted January 7, 2022 Report Posted January 7, 2022 3 minutes ago, Noeller said: Dude.... Reading comprehension: "Back To Back To Back" = Three Peat This will not end well for you Noeller. Hahaha Noeller and Stickem 1 1
Goldkobra Posted January 7, 2022 Report Posted January 7, 2022 30 minutes ago, Noeller said: Dude.... Reading comprehension: "Back To Back To Back" = Three Peat My bad JCon and Noeller 2
CodyT Posted January 7, 2022 Report Posted January 7, 2022 32 minutes ago, Noeller said: Dude.... Reading comprehension: "Back To Back To Back" = Three Peat Yeah for clarity, I meant 3x champions in a row wbbfan, JCon and Noeller 3
Noeller Posted January 7, 2022 Report Posted January 7, 2022 I swear I read it a dozen times to make sure I wasn't crazy.....ha ha. wbbfan, GCJenks, bearpants and 1 other 1 3
Brandon Posted January 7, 2022 Report Posted January 7, 2022 4 minutes ago, Noeller said: I swear I read it a dozen times to make sure I wasn't crazy.....ha ha. But you are crazy!
BBlink Posted January 7, 2022 Report Posted January 7, 2022 Bubba Zanetti, Pete Catan's Ghost, Wanna-B-Fanboy and 5 others 8
Mark H. Posted January 7, 2022 Report Posted January 7, 2022 2 hours ago, wbbfan said: Or do what hamilton did with june jones. Understand that you dont have a 5 man unit that is capable of protecting the qb long enough to run the 5-1 spread and add protection. 11 form with a primary blocking back, 21, 20 etc. For years the spread offense was looked down upon as not viable because putting the qb in the gun with 5 ol made him a sitting duck. The big adjustment that really brought the spread to high level d1 schools and the NFL is versatile TEs, and more recently versatile flex tes. The difference between getting pressure of the edge when a TE is on the line vs not is big. Even in block and release or pure route running. Having to run around a line 1 man wider is big. When a team lines up in the pistol with no te you can cut down the qbs time by a lot. Teams will blitz more too. They know one way or another they can cut down the qbs time. Even if they dont get a pressure or a sack they can prevent time to throw a deep ball. With the extra man on the line you can get stalemated in the rush and beat deep. 15 ish years ago teams had a lot more unique identity in the offense and defense they ran. Today, the variability is very low. The big differences in 21 was 1 mtl/edm running much more RPO (though not running it really well) and 2 the bombers for one running out of farm more sets. Many of the same plays and looks, but with a more varied pre snap look. The defenses had even less variability. Bend but dont break secondary's and layered pass rushing trying to take away time for the deep ball rules the cfl. So every one is fighting to fill the same type of roster gaps, with a limited or none existent supply of players in the market. The success the riders have had (over achieving a lot imo) the last 2 seasons has had a lot to do with a very limited qb who has a different skill set. More teams need to think out side the box and get creative. A team like ottawa has 0 chance of filling all its roster holes and turning into a bluebomber esq team this year. For a team like that to break out, they have to break the mold. I would say you also need at least one or two legit deep threats in the receiving corps. When an opposing D knows you can and will stretch the field, it changes the number and type of players they can consistently commit to the pass rush. They'll be less likely to roll the dice and send a blitz. wbbfan 1
wbbfan Posted January 7, 2022 Report Posted January 7, 2022 Just now, Mark H. said: I would say you also need at least one or two legit deep threats in the receiving corps. When an opposing D knows you can and will stretch the field, it changes the number and type of players they can consistently commit to the pass rush. They'll be less likely to roll the dice and send a blitz. True. You always need to stretch the defense in more than 1 direction. That deep threat doesnt need to be the fastest guy, but on top of that having a shifty fast yac guy who can bust big gains on cut backs while the defense is stretched out is huge. If you add a running qb to that you have an incredibly dangerous offense that can help an inexperienced ol out a lot.
Bubba Zanetti Posted January 7, 2022 Report Posted January 7, 2022 20 minutes ago, BBlink said: That dude is crazy lol. Ever see the Kenny vs Spenny episode with the Sheik? That is some funny s***! JCon 1
Mark H. Posted January 7, 2022 Report Posted January 7, 2022 21 minutes ago, wbbfan said: True. You always need to stretch the defense in more than 1 direction. That deep threat doesnt need to be the fastest guy, but on top of that having a shifty fast yac guy who can bust big gains on cut backs while the defense is stretched out is huge. If you add a running qb to that you have an incredibly dangerous offense that can help an inexperienced ol out a lot. Yep, forgot to add a legit YAC threat Exhibit A: Nic Demski Noeller, JCon, wbbfan and 1 other 4
JCon Posted January 7, 2022 Author Report Posted January 7, 2022 Ticats would be smart to target Lucky as a replacement for Banks. wbbfan, Tracker, Noeller and 1 other 1 3
wbbfan Posted January 7, 2022 Report Posted January 7, 2022 1 minute ago, JCon said: Ticats would be smart to target Lucky as a replacement for Banks. Oh man that would be scary good. JCon 1
Mark H. Posted January 7, 2022 Report Posted January 7, 2022 41 minutes ago, JCon said: Ticats would be smart to target Lucky as a replacement for Banks. Especially with Masoli buying time on roll outs - I'm never sure why his mobility is not utilized more Collaros IMO does more than guys who are advertised as mobile QBs Noeller, JCon and wbbfan 3
Jesse Posted January 7, 2022 Report Posted January 7, 2022 2 minutes ago, Mark H. said: Especially with Masoli buying time on roll outs - I'm never sure why his mobility is not utilized more that Collaros IMO does more than guys who are advertised as mobile QBs Collaros has always been known for his pocket mobility. Noeller and Mark H. 2
Geebrr Posted January 7, 2022 Report Posted January 7, 2022 Sounds like (some how) Lenius is signing some sort of contract down south. Noeller 1
Jesse Posted January 7, 2022 Report Posted January 7, 2022 5 minutes ago, Geebrr said: Sounds like (some how) Lenius is signing some sort of contract down south. Multiple offers, apparently.
blue_gold_84 Posted January 7, 2022 Report Posted January 7, 2022 2 minutes ago, Jesse said: Multiple offers, apparently. Sounds like he'll have a decent shot at landing somewhere. Jesse 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now