Rod Black Posted September 11, 2022 Report Posted September 11, 2022 Just now, kelownabomberfan said: Yeah she wasn't the Queen until 1952. Ok. Probably 1928 then. kelownabomberfan 1
Tracker Posted September 11, 2022 Report Posted September 11, 2022 4 hours ago, BomberfanMKS said: Yeh BOLO isn't as sure a catcher The sample size is way too small for that sort of pronouncement. Geebrr and rebusrankin 2
Booch Posted September 12, 2022 Report Posted September 12, 2022 By all accounts he has great hands...and from the small sample size seems to...he catches generally with his hands too...which is a plus Noeller 1
Saidin Posted September 12, 2022 Report Posted September 12, 2022 K-Shack, Bubba Zanetti, MOBomberFan and 9 others 12
WinnipegGordo Posted September 12, 2022 Report Posted September 12, 2022 ddanger, Wideleft and Wanna-B-Fanboy 2 1
Geebrr Posted September 12, 2022 Report Posted September 12, 2022 CodyT, Noeller, blue_gold_84 and 2 others 3 2
Goldkobra Posted September 12, 2022 Report Posted September 12, 2022 8 hours ago, WinnipegGordo said: That's my edit!! JCon, WinnipegGordo, Jesse and 3 others 6
Bigblue204 Posted September 12, 2022 Report Posted September 12, 2022 4 hours ago, Geebrr said: And unlike cirder fans who wear them for no damn reason. Stegall actually played for the Bengals so there's some sense to wearing it. Dr Zaius, bearpants, Jesse and 6 others 3 6
Jesse Posted September 12, 2022 Report Posted September 12, 2022 5 hours ago, Geebrr said: What a terrible game to go to....
voodoochylde Posted September 12, 2022 Report Posted September 12, 2022 Just now, Jesse said: What a terrible game to go to.... Not sure if this is sarcasm or not but that game was wild Mr. Perfect 1
blue_gold_84 Posted September 12, 2022 Report Posted September 12, 2022 Just now, voodoochylde said: Not sure if this is sarcasm or not but that game was wild IIRC, @Jesse is a Bengals fan. voodoochylde 1
Jesse Posted September 12, 2022 Report Posted September 12, 2022 10 minutes ago, blue_gold_84 said: IIRC, @Jesse is a Bengals fan. Wow. Good memory. Yes - it was a bad game if you were cheering for the Bengals and they just contiually gave the game away.
JCon Posted September 12, 2022 Author Report Posted September 12, 2022 Noeller, Geebrr and blue_gold_84 2 1
bearpants Posted September 12, 2022 Report Posted September 12, 2022 5 minutes ago, JCon said: so in this scenario, that would mean only BC can catch the Bombers... so realistically it should say a Bomber win and Calgary loss clinches first place
17to85 Posted September 12, 2022 Report Posted September 12, 2022 Could you imagine the kind of collapse it would take to not finish first? Noeller 1
TrueBlue4ever Posted September 12, 2022 Report Posted September 12, 2022 3 minutes ago, 17to85 said: Could you imagine the kind of collapse it would take to not finish first? Bombers could win their next 3 and still not clinch first if BC runs the table. But losing Rourke has made that prospect so much tougher for them.
17to85 Posted September 12, 2022 Report Posted September 12, 2022 Just now, TrueBlue4ever said: Bombers could win their next 3 and still not clinch first if BC runs the table. But losing Rourke has made that prospect so much tougher for them. Officially sure but bc ain't running the table. Not with the qbs they have left. Unofficially though... almost done. Only real way it would be buggered up is if God forbid collaros got hurt. (knocking on wood typing this) Noeller 1
Brandon Posted September 12, 2022 Report Posted September 12, 2022 7 minutes ago, 17to85 said: Officially sure but bc ain't running the table. Not with the qbs they have left. Unofficially though... almost done. Only real way it would be buggered up is if God forbid collaros got hurt. (knocking on wood typing this) Confirmed if anything goes bad we blame 17to85 for jinxing us! TrueBlue4ever, TBURGESS, Noeller and 3 others 6
17to85 Posted September 12, 2022 Report Posted September 12, 2022 Just now, Brandon said: Confirmed if anything goes bad we blame 17to85 Why not? My wife already does it. Bigblue204, Noeller, Wanna-B-Fanboy and 7 others 1 9
blue_or_die Posted September 12, 2022 Report Posted September 12, 2022 13 minutes ago, 17to85 said: Officially sure but bc ain't running the table. Not with the qbs they have left. Unofficially though... almost done. Only real way it would be buggered up is if God forbid collaros got hurt. (knocking on wood typing this) I'm not superstitious but OMFG WHY WOULD YOU SAY THAT Noeller and Wanna-B-Fanboy 1 1
TrueBlue4ever Posted September 12, 2022 Report Posted September 12, 2022 If this comes to pass, BANNED! rebusrankin and Jesse 2
Tracker Posted September 12, 2022 Report Posted September 12, 2022 1 hour ago, TrueBlue4ever said: Bombers could win their next 3 and still not clinch first if BC runs the table. But losing Rourke has made that prospect so much tougher for them. About the same odds as me getting pregnant. Statistically speaking, the odds are so close to zero as to be indistinguishable from zero.
Noeller Posted September 12, 2022 Report Posted September 12, 2022 David....seriously........ CodyT and JCon 2
Wanna-B-Fanboy Posted September 12, 2022 Report Posted September 12, 2022 4 hours ago, 17to85 said: Could you imagine the kind of collapse it would take to not finish first?
Recommended Posts