Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
16 minutes ago, Wanna-B-Fanboy said:

Mentally soft- too easy to rattle. 

Indeed. I'll always remember the 2019 Grey Cup, thinking early that we had them just by his actions alone when we were caving in their offensive tackles pretty much from the start of the game.

Posted
4 minutes ago, Mr. Perfect said:

Indeed. I'll always remember the 2019 Grey Cup, thinking early that we had them just by his actions alone when we were caving in their offensive tackles pretty much from the start of the game.

You can't feel sorry for a guy like that. He gets paid to win. I've een nothing from Evans to think he's the long term starter for the Ti Cats.

Posted
49 minutes ago, Wanna-B-Fanboy said:

So... Rourke didn't have a banner game against the ticats... I wonder if he's been "figured out"?

I dont know if figured out is the right term - he's just settling into a much more realistic course as which tends to happen as more games are played. He has six INTs over his last three games including tonight which is pretty much par for the course for a rookie. He has talent, but he's not a mythical great QB like many were making him out to be as recent as the days leading up to our game against them a couple weeks back

 

Posted
7 hours ago, Mr. Perfect said:

I dont know if figured out is the right term - he's just settling into a much more realistic course as which tends to happen as more games are played. He has six INTs over his last three games including tonight which is pretty much par for the course for a rookie. He has talent, but he's not a mythical great QB like many were making him out to be as recent as the days leading up to our game against them a couple weeks back

The first pick was Lucky's fault. The second was partly Rourke not putting enough on the ball, partly a great DB play and partly his receiver falling coming back to the ball. Both throws were on time on target and to an open receiver.

Rourke's the best young QB to come along in a long time, but he's still a young QB who will make mistakes. He didn't have a great game last night, but they still won ugly.

Posted (edited)
53 minutes ago, rebusrankin said:

Ottawa 0-6 and overall they are 3-17 with Lapo. Does he last the year?

what are their choices..... fire lapo, and make benavides interim head coach.... season end get new coach from other team assistants.

Maas might get a head coach job.....done pretty well with a useless  quarterback. carried himself well, no outbursts... on a team with a lot of problems.

or sask D coach. they have a decent defence. also seems like a reliable person. dont know.

B.C. D is playing well... maybe their D guy.

or the obvious guy. 😂

LaPo....the third and short kick from the 33.... hard to understand that decision. specially with a struglling kicker.

 

 

 

Edited by Mark F
Posted
3 hours ago, rebusrankin said:

Ottawa 0-6 and overall they are 3-17 with Lapo. Does he last the year?

He has the Masoli excuse which might give him some traction. But Jesus, #1 Adams could have made a play in the end zone in the dying minutes. 

Posted
3 hours ago, TBURGESS said:

The first pick was Lucky's fault. The second was partly Rourke not putting enough on the ball, partly a great DB play and partly his receiver falling coming back to the ball. Both throws were on time on target and to an open receiver.

Rourke's the best young QB to come along in a long time, but he's still a young QB who will make mistakes. He didn't have a great game last night, but they still won ugly.

Yup - Neither of his INT's against Ham were bad ones.  TBH there should almost be a stat line for INT's caused by receiver drops like the one to Lucky (or our game finisher in Calgary) since those are fundamentally different from an INT where the QB threw the ball to a defender.

The second INT was a sick play from the HAM safety... the other team is playing too.

1 minute ago, Rod Black said:

He has the Masoli excuse which might give him some traction. But Jesus, #1 Adams could have made a play in the end zone in the dying minutes. 

Yeh Adam's dropping the TD in the endzone to lose the game is rough

Posted (edited)
13 minutes ago, Rod Black said:

He has the Masoli excuse which might give him some traction. But Jesus, #1 Adams could have made a play in the end zone in the dying minutes. 

Easy to have the QB excuse when you can never develop one.

Lapo is supposed to be an offensive guru, but his teams never score more than average.

11 hours ago, Mr. Perfect said:

I dont know if figured out is the right term - he's just settling into a much more realistic course as which tends to happen as more games are played. He has six INTs over his last three games including tonight which is pretty much par for the course for a rookie. He has talent, but he's not a mythical great QB like many were making him out to be as recent as the days leading up to our game against them a couple weeks back

 

Some gameplanning issues there IMO.  Lucky Whitehead isn't a guy to be featured (he's a 3rd-4th option with yes great speed but not much else he does well downfield) and certainly not on a night when he needs to be the primary kick returner too.  They were really force feeding him last night and it nearly cost them the game.  Certainly bogged down the offense, one turnover almost two with the returns.

Edited by JuranBoldenRules

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...