JCon Posted February 10, 2023 Report Posted February 10, 2023 9 minutes ago, Wideleft said: Fixed and thanks. It takes a community to raise an accurate roster status list. Just pull up your bootstraps. blue_gold_84, Wideleft and rebusrankin 3
GCn20 Posted February 10, 2023 Report Posted February 10, 2023 (edited) 8 minutes ago, JCon said: Just pull up your bootstraps. LOL 1 hour ago, GCJenks said: Thanks for keeping this up to date. Can you imagine what the Rider version looks like... Just a string of random letters from the illiterati over there just mashing the keyboard randomly I would imagine. Assuming, of course, they could figure out how to turn on their laptop/computer/device in the first place. 19 minutes ago, Wideleft said: Fixed and thanks. It takes a community to raise an accurate roster status list. No sweat. A pretty forgettable transaction and player. Edited February 10, 2023 by GCn20 Wideleft and GCJenks 2
Wideleft Posted February 10, 2023 Author Report Posted February 10, 2023 1 hour ago, Wideleft said: Available for all to use on imgur. Just search "Rider fire". WBBFanWest, blue_gold_84, GCJenks and 2 others 5
Colin Unger Posted February 10, 2023 Report Posted February 10, 2023 On 2023-02-08 at 2:32 PM, wbbfan said: Full complement of draft picks. Been a while since we had that. Based on our depth across the board I think we basically pick the best player available through the draft. With perhaps a slight bias towards a receiver and defensive line. I really need to wrap my head around the exact nuances of the new nationalized import rules. The idea is that a nationalized import can sub in for an injured canadian starter. Does that mean that Bighill has no value as a nationalized import since he's already starting? Does it only have value when a designated import is a nationalized import? Or can you essentially bring in any DI to replace Thomas if he gets injured so long as you have one or more nationalized imports on the starting defense? Wideleft 1
Wideleft Posted February 10, 2023 Author Report Posted February 10, 2023 44 minutes ago, Colin Unger said: Based on our depth across the board I think we basically pick the best player available through the draft. With perhaps a slight bias towards a receiver and defensive line. I really need to wrap my head around the exact nuances of the new nationalized import rules. The idea is that a nationalized import can sub in for an injured canadian starter. Does that mean that Bighill has no value as a nationalized import since he's already starting? Does it only have value when a designated import is a nationalized import? Or can you essentially bring in any DI to replace Thomas if he gets injured so long as you have one or more nationalized imports on the starting defense? Noeller and blue_gold_84 2
Booch Posted February 10, 2023 Report Posted February 10, 2023 2 hours ago, Colin Unger said: Based on our depth across the board I think we basically pick the best player available through the draft. With perhaps a slight bias towards a receiver and defensive line. I really need to wrap my head around the exact nuances of the new nationalized import rules. The idea is that a nationalized import can sub in for an injured canadian starter. Does that mean that Bighill has no value as a nationalized import since he's already starting? Does it only have value when a designated import is a nationalized import? Or can you essentially bring in any DI to replace Thomas if he gets injured so long as you have one or more nationalized imports on the starting defense? this....can e a DI or a non starting import....you just switch one of the nationalized guys on offence....or defense ...whatever side of the ball the injury took place to a National to maintain your ratio....you still need to have the ratio maintained as to how you are going to use your nationals you as listed before the game...how many on offence and defense tho. I like the rule...rewards teams for continuity, and improves the quality of the game GCJenks, blue_gold_84 and Colin Unger 2 1
Colin Unger Posted February 10, 2023 Report Posted February 10, 2023 39 minutes ago, Booch said: this....can e a DI or a non starting import....you just switch one of the nationalized guys on offence....or defense ...whatever side of the ball the injury took place to a National to maintain your ratio....you still need to have the ratio maintained as to how you are going to use your nationals you as listed before the game...how many on offence and defense tho. I like the rule...rewards teams for continuity, and improves the quality of the game Bombers should hire me to play on the defensive line. Pretty sure id get hurt on the first play of the game. BigBlueFanatic, ddanger, Wideleft and 1 other 4
Wideleft Posted February 10, 2023 Author Report Posted February 10, 2023 6 minutes ago, Colin Unger said: Bombers should hire me to play on the defensive line. Pretty sure id get hurt on the first play of the game. Impressive. Most Riders tear their Achilles in training camp. BigBlueFanatic, blue_gold_84, Colin Unger and 1 other 1 3
Wanna-B-Fanboy Posted February 10, 2023 Report Posted February 10, 2023 (edited) 4 hours ago, Colin Unger said: Based on our depth across the board I think we basically pick the best player available through the draft. With perhaps a slight bias towards a receiver and defensive line. I really need to wrap my head around the exact nuances of the new nationalized import rules. The idea is that a nationalized import can sub in for an injured canadian starter. Does that mean that Bighill has no value as a nationalized import since he's already starting? Does it only have value when a designated import is a nationalized import? Or can you essentially bring in any DI to replace Thomas if he gets injured so long as you have one or more nationalized imports on the starting defense? Chris Jones is going to abuse the **** out of this... and then the league will remove the rule, and we collective say, "this is why we can't have nice things... **** you Corky and take your juice pigs home..." Edited February 10, 2023 by Wanna-B-Fanboy BigBlueFanatic 1
WinnipegGordo Posted February 10, 2023 Report Posted February 10, 2023 Looks like the Bombers reworked Brandon Alexander's contract according to the CFL transactions page. My guess is he got a bump in salary as he only made 77k last season. wbbfan, Noeller, Stickem and 3 others 6
Noeller Posted February 10, 2023 Report Posted February 10, 2023 3 minutes ago, WinnipegGordo said: Looks like the Bombers reworked Brandon Alexander's contract according to the CFL transactions page. My guess is he got a bump in salary as he only made 77k last season. good for him... worth every penny. If he and Kyrie Wilson stay healthy this year, our entire defense is going to look so good. Piggy 1, wbbfan, Geebrr and 4 others 3 4
Nolby Posted February 11, 2023 Report Posted February 11, 2023 43 minutes ago, Noeller said: good for him... worth every penny. If he and Kyrie Wilson stay healthy this year, our entire defense is going to look so good. Getting those injured bodies back from last year almost feels like we stole em from someone. GCJenks 1
wbbfan Posted February 11, 2023 Report Posted February 11, 2023 2 hours ago, WinnipegGordo said: Looks like the Bombers reworked Brandon Alexander's contract according to the CFL transactions page. My guess is he got a bump in salary as he only made 77k last season. I imagine they rebalanced it so he got more bonus money up front. Probably not a year where the blue go deep into the bonus money so they could push some salary to bonus and free up flexibility late in the year like they did late last year with a couple guys.
Wideleft Posted February 11, 2023 Author Report Posted February 11, 2023 4 hours ago, WinnipegGordo said: Looks like the Bombers reworked Brandon Alexander's contract according to the CFL transactions page. My guess is he got a bump in salary as he only made 77k last season. Wow. That's horrific. As a manager by trade, I just lost a little respect for our organization. I'm into the rye, so don't f'%(<ing @ me. bigg jay 1
JCon Posted February 11, 2023 Report Posted February 11, 2023 7 minutes ago, Wideleft said: Wow. That's horrific. As a manager by trade, I just lost a little respect for our organization. I'm into the rye, so don't f'%(<ing @ me. He wasn't originally expected back until October, I believe. Wideleft 1
Noeller Posted February 11, 2023 Report Posted February 11, 2023 Bombers scout that I've never heard of (and what a name.....) writing stuff for the website about what it's like down south scouting right now...... Piggy 1 and camper_2 2
Tracker Posted February 11, 2023 Report Posted February 11, 2023 19 hours ago, Colin Unger said: Bombers should hire me to play on the defensive line. Pretty sure id get hurt on the first play of the game. Or pulling on your socks in the locker room.
TrueBlue4ever Posted February 11, 2023 Report Posted February 11, 2023 (edited) 18 minutes ago, Tracker said: Or pulling on your socks in the locker room. Colin’s “audition highlight tape” to the Bomber club: Edited February 11, 2023 by TrueBlue4ever Tracker 1
TrueBlue4ever Posted February 11, 2023 Report Posted February 11, 2023 To be fair, this would be my audition tape
Stickem Posted February 11, 2023 Report Posted February 11, 2023 14 minutes ago, TrueBlue4ever said: To be fair, this would be my audition tape you're signed.....now go get that green and white uni on ...we're heading for the Peg TrueBlue4ever 1
TrueBlue4ever Posted February 11, 2023 Report Posted February 11, 2023 1 hour ago, Stickem said: you're signed.....now go get that green and white uni on ...we're heading for the Peg GCJenks and Stickem 1 1
Dodge and Burn Posted February 12, 2023 Report Posted February 12, 2023 Looking at what is out there for DL, Wakefield (Ott) might be worth a look.
Pete Catan's Ghost Posted February 12, 2023 Report Posted February 12, 2023 Kerfalla Exume and Mike Jones are both well known by the brain trust. Any chance either one gets picked up during F.A.?
Noeller Posted February 12, 2023 Report Posted February 12, 2023 Exume left specifically because he wanted to be at home. Never say never but I think he wants to be in the east.
Recommended Posts