Jump to content

Bombers Rookie Camp/Training Camp/Pre-Season Thread

Noeller

By Noeller
in Blue Bomber Discussion

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

DTonOB
DTonOB

I've got some time, so here's what we've talked about on the CJOB Sports Show (happy to answer any questions for the next little bit): WR has been consistenly Lawler-Schoen-Demski-Bailey-Wolitars

CodyT
CodyT

Agudosi with a great catch deep for the td.. match up nightmare mare.    Bailey catching everything in his direction. If it were my first time watching the Bombers I'd say he's their best pl

BBlink
BBlink

Just got back from practice. Got there a little late, left a little early. Thought I'd write up some notes with the obvious disclaimer that I have no idea what I'm talking about. But people are hungry

Rod Black Grand Master

Rod Black

Posted
Posted (edited)
52 minutes ago, Fatty Liver said:

I was responding to Goalie's suggestion that Castillo could be at risk of losing his job to Staton, I don't think a decision like that should be made quickly, again experience and past performance under pressure counts.

And I missed the quote. Fair enough! No need to make a quick decision. 

Edited by Rod Black
GCn20 Grand Master

GCn20

Posted
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, TBURGESS said:

You have nothing but a made up story that has a bunch of holes in it. You're assuming your ideas are facts & confusing 'What Ifs' with proof. 

Have the Bombers sent players home and put them on the suspended list? Yes. Did they do it in this in Grants case? Maybe? Is that proof? Nope.

Have the Bombers offered to give players the first week off and let them go home? Maybe? Did they do it in this case? Maybe? Is that proof? Nope.  

Is your story possible? Yes. Doesn't that make it true? Possibly. Does it put the Bombers in the best light possible? Yes. 

It's your MO. Take a possibility that puts the Bombers in the best light possible, say that's what happened, then argue with anyone (No it's not JUST me) who asks for proof. 

 

just-let-it-go-forget-it.gif

 

Sorry but if it walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, I am going to use a little bit of reasonable deduction and assume it's a duck. I am not like you and will not ask it to prove it's not a moose because there is a 1% chance it's a moose in disguise. I can't prove i am right, but I would wager big money on it and I think most people on this forum will think the conclusion i have come to, based on everything we know on this, is more than reasonable. So...a big whatever to you...I guess.

Edited by GCn20
Rod Black Grand Master

Rod Black

Posted
Posted (edited)
11 minutes ago, GCn20 said:

Sorry but if it walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, I am going to use a little bit of reasonable deduction and assume it's a duck. I am not like you and will not ask it to prove it's not a moose because there is a 1% chance it's a moose in disguise. I can't prove i am right, but I would wager big money on it and I think most people on this forum will think the conclusion i have come to, based on everything we know on this, is more than reasonable. So...a big whatever to you...I guess.

I’ll vote that you have a theory, inconclusive. 

Edited by Rod Black
GCn20 Grand Master

GCn20

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Rod Black said:

I’ll vote that you have a theory, inconclusive. 

Well, I would expect you to take that tack after floating out the disciplinary theory.

Rod Black Grand Master

Rod Black

Posted
Posted
Just now, GCn20 said:

Well, I would expect you to take that tack after floating out the disciplinary theory.

Of course. But it doesn’t really matter, does it? 

GCn20 Grand Master

GCn20

Posted
Posted (edited)
14 minutes ago, Rod Black said:

Of course. But it doesn’t really matter, does it? 

It doesn't matter to you I guess. I am happy with the conclusions I have drawn as being the most overwhelmingly likely scenario with any other interpretation being a fractional % chance of accuracy. I will reserve my todaso for when we probably get the whole story from the horse's mouth in the near future, and it ends up being exactly as I described.

Edited by GCn20
Arnold_Palmer Veteran

Arnold_Palmer

Posted
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Atomic said:

Feels like the coaching staff are getting a little cocky thinking all our mid-30s veterans can beat every other team without ever practicing

 

Edited by Arnold_Palmer
Rod Black Grand Master

Rod Black

Posted
Posted (edited)
40 minutes ago, GCn20 said:

It doesn't matter to you I guess. I am happy with the conclusions I have drawn as being the most overwhelmingly likely scenario with any other interpretation being a fractional % chance of accuracy. I will reserve my todaso for when we probably get the whole story from the horse's mouth in the near future, and it ends up being exactly as I described.

And it’s ok for you to be happy with the heart felt conclusion you have drawn. Your conviction or belief may provide you with motivation to discuss, but not everyone will and won’t buy it - which I can say with conviction. I wouldn’t speculate whether we get the whole story at all, because we’ve been told it’s private, maybe it’s a goofy story anyways, and many folks appear fine with the silence. What would a told you so prove anyway and what would you do if your wrong? 
Keep speculating! There’s fun in that. 

6 minutes ago, Jesse said:

So, now Lawler's been suspended (definitely for disciplinary reasons) due to his incident last time he played for us. F****** heck, man.

What? Impaired driving? 

Edited by Rod Black
Rod Black Grand Master

Rod Black

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Bubba Zanetti said:

He's facing disciplinary issues again for something that happened 2 years ago?? WTF??

Seems very strange. I would think he saw it coming when he signed here. 

bigg jay Grand Master

bigg jay

Posted
Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, Brandon said:

I can't remember if he was arrested/charged for the DUI thing?   Maybe he violated terms?

He was definitely arrested and formally charged but haven't seen any info out there on what kind of punishment he got.  The court system doesn't usually move very fast so maybe it hasn't all played out yet?

Edited by bigg jay
TBURGESS Veteran

TBURGESS

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, GCn20 said:

Sorry but if it walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, I am going to use a little bit of reasonable deduction and assume it's a duck. I am not like you and will not ask it to prove it's not a moose because there is a 1% chance it's a moose in disguise. I can't prove i am right, but I would wager big money on it and I think most people on this forum will think the conclusion i have come to, based on everything we know on this, is more than reasonable. So...a big whatever to you...I guess.

I wish I'd taken the wager before the news came out today from the club proving you to be completely wrong & proving that the my 'most likely case' was wrong too. 

If, like you suggest, 'most people on the forum' have drawn the same wrong conclusion, then you are proving that having the most people on your side doesn't mean you are right.

SpeedFlex27 Grand Master

SpeedFlex27

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, TBURGESS said:

I wish I'd taken the wager before the news came out today from the club proving you to be completely wrong & proving that the my 'most likely case' was wrong too. 

If, like you suggest, 'most people on the forum' have drawn the same wrong conclusion, then you are proving that having the most people on your side doesn't mean you are right.

Man, who cares??? Kenny Lawler's been suspended. That's what people care about right now. Not your conspiracy theories. Or feeding your ego arguing about stuff that isn't important. 

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

×
×
  • Create New...