Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
30 minutes ago, JuranBoldenRules said:

Again, crazy to me how the depth has been allowed to get to where it is.

I don't really know what their plan is at this point if a Canadian goes down in practice.  The only guy not on the roster is Murphy.  The guys on 1 game are OL and DT.  Razor thin.  They basically haven't replaced Miller and Burtenshaw.

Screwed If we suffer any more loses at a lot of positions. don’t even want to think what happens if walker goes down tomorrow. 
Half a games worth of plays for schmekel? Eww

Posted
14 hours ago, 17to85 said:

Jesus christ.... me reading all the posts about reasons people miss games.... and then it just now dawns on me thursday is the kids swimming lessons and it's their last class... and it's their absolute favourite thing.... damn weiner kids.

Lets face it- kids are just a bad investment.

Posted
1 minute ago, greenrider55 said:

Houston out… but it’s non-injury related? Hope all is well with him.

You may recall that at the time he came to Winnipeg, his daughter was hit in the leg by a random shooting in his hometown and this may relate to that.

Posted
54 minutes ago, Tracker said:

You may recall that at the time he came to Winnipeg, his daughter was hit in the leg by a random shooting in his hometown and this may relate to that.

Hopefully she's healed and this is just something else.

Posted
3 hours ago, BomberBall said:

This is a bit confusing… A 44 man roster?

My guess is that if Brady can't play, they'll put McCrae on, leave Brady on and have a 45-man roster. Saves them a bit on the salary cap, though it would have them essentially playing with a 44-man roster.

What we were wondering about is if Brady can play are they allowed to add Fox back in and say "that's part of our game-time decision"?
 

Posted
27 minutes ago, DTonOB said:

My guess is that if Brady can't play, they'll put McCrae on, leave Brady on and have a 45-man roster. Saves them a bit on the salary cap, though it would have them essentially playing with a 44-man roster.

What we were wondering about is if Brady can play are they allowed to add Fox back in and say "that's part of our game-time decision"?
 

Not having that extra Dline man would be a fools game

Posted
15 minutes ago, Booch said:

Not having that extra Dline man would be a fools game

Which is what makes me wonder if they can add Miles Fox at game time. He was able to bump out to end a couple of times vs Sask...valuable snaps to rest for Jefferson/Haba.

Posted
47 minutes ago, DTonOB said:

My guess is that if Brady can't play, they'll put McCrae on, leave Brady on and have a 45-man roster. Saves them a bit on the salary cap, though it would have them essentially playing with a 44-man roster.

What we were wondering about is if Brady can play are they allowed to add Fox back in and say "that's part of our game-time decision"?
 

Is there a non-salary related reason why they wouldn’t dress Murphy even as an extra body to play a couple special teams?  Maybe planning to send him back to school?

Posted
32 minutes ago, DTonOB said:

Which is what makes me wonder if they can add Miles Fox at game time. He was able to bump out to end a couple of times vs Sask...valuable snaps to rest for Jefferson/Haba.

same, and yeah seen that too...He is a bit better bumped out than Walker, and actually I think gives more push up middle as well, 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...