Bombers at Ottawa

[Noeller]

Don't forget there's extra draft picks available to the team that uses the loophole least. It's something at least....

[Pepper_Brooks]

16 minutes ago, Geebrr said:

I’m glad the weirdest guy on the internet weighed in. 

Ad hominem attacks are the refuge of the intellectually bankrupt.

[JuranBoldenRules]

5 minutes ago, Noeller said:

Don't forget there's extra draft picks available to the team that uses the loophole least. It's something at least....

I think BC has that almost by default.  They can't really use it because they have so few guys who qualify.

Hamilton and the Bombers giving them a run for sure, but we did use Grant for a half dozen snaps.

[Geebrr]

7 minutes ago, Noeller said:

Don't forget there's extra draft picks available to the team that uses the loophole least. It's something at least....

That would be an advantage. I don’t recall ever hearing it. 

Anyway - it is crazy what a healthy Jeffcoat and Lawson does to the perception of our DL for me. 
 

Just gotta hope that JJ can stay on the field the rest of the way. 

[Mark F]

2 hours ago, wbbfan said:

Article says Agudosi will start but the roster has mccrae. I’m guessing dosi starts while mccrae returns and subs in for some plays. 

I am ascared that MCrae is too slight to stand up to the pounding returning kicks.

[Geebrr]

2 minutes ago, Mark F said:

I am ascared that MCrae is too slight to stand up to the pounding returning kicks.

Pretty crazy how much abuse Grant can shake off.

[rebusrankin]

Hamilton has been starting a Canadian such as Kongbo or Bennett and having Davis as the designated national the past few games.

[Booch]

7 minutes ago, Mark F said:

I am ascared that MCrae is too slight to stand up to the pounding returning kicks.

If Speedy B can handle it...Mcrae can as Mcrae isnt a whiny biatch 

[Geebrr]

4 minutes ago, rebusrankin said:

Hamilton has been starting a Canadian such as Kongbo or Bennett and having Davis as the designated national the past few games.

I thought you had to be with the same team for a few years in a row? 
 

That’s pretty good use

[rebusrankin]

3 minutes ago, Geebrr said:

I thought you had to be with the same team for a few years in a row? 
 

That’s pretty good use

I just checked and I was wrong, thought they had. D'OH.

[BigBlueFanatic]

3 minutes ago, rebusrankin said:

I just checked and I was wrong, thought they had. D'OH.

To be a DN it’s three years with the same team or five years in the league, so Davis still counts

[Geebrr]

5 minutes ago, BigBlueFanatic said:

To be a DN it’s three years with the same team or five years in the league, so Davis still counts

I thought it was 3 consecutively. That’s even better. 

[Nolby]

If I spin around 3 times in front of the mirror saying, "Kenny Lawler, Kenny Lawler, Kenny Lawler"....does he then appear on the starting lineup?

Edited July 14, 2023 by Nolby

[JuranBoldenRules]

Just now, Nolby said:

If I spin around 3 times in front of the mirror saying, Kenny Lawler, Kenny Lawler, Kenny Lawler"....does he then appear on the starting lineup?

He will appear but still be ineligible to work in Canada.

[wbbfan]

54 minutes ago, Mark F said:

I am ascared that MCrae is too slight to stand up to the pounding returning kicks.

I’m more worried about his hands and decision making returning punts. Lots of small guys have done it in the past. May not hold up for years but he will be fine health wise in the short term. 
 Don’t forget too he’s a rb by trade. Much more durable. 

[Nolby]

10 minutes ago, JuranBoldenRules said:

He will appear but still be ineligible to work in Canada.

I'm assuming this lack of presence means this doesn't go against our cap? I don't know tons about team caps and things like this.

[Sard]

Just now, Nolby said:

I'm assuming this lack of presence means this doesn't go against our cap? I don't know tons about team caps and things like this.

He's currently on the suspended list, which is basically equivalent to not being on the team, so wouldn't count against the cap.

[bearpants]

1 hour ago, Noeller said:

Don't forget there's extra draft picks available to the team that uses the loophole least. It's something at least....

I've been thinking about this actually... I wonder if the Bombers are playing the long game on this... knowing if they basically don't use the rule at all for the first half, even 12 games, of the season... they are almost assured to get that bonus draft pick... also, knowing our team can compete without using the rule... then come crunch/playoff time, they start to use it more... maybe I'm overthinking it... but I feel like it's a possibility.

[Booch]

20 minutes ago, wbbfan said:

I’m more worried about his hands and decision making returning punts. Lots of small guys have done it in the past. May not hold up for years but he will be fine health wise in the short term. 
 Don’t forget too he’s a rb by trade. Much more durable. 

thing about Mcrae...All his touches at CentalFlorida....zero fumbles...406 carries...33 receptions....6 returns....I not too worried

[bluto]

1 hour ago, Pepper_Brooks said:

Ad hominem attacks are the refuge of the intellectually bankrupt.

It's only ad hominem if you consider being called "weird" an attack.

[Pepper_Brooks]

3 minutes ago, bluto said:

It's only ad hominem if you consider being called "weird" an attack.

I personally don't, but It's evident that Geebrr intended it as an assault on my character.

Embracing the peculiar is truly marvelous, while conforming to normality can stifle the essence of art, culture, and individuality.

[Wideleft]

3 minutes ago, Pepper_Brooks said:

I personally don't, but It's evident that Geebrr intended it as an assault on my character.

Embracing the peculiar is truly marvelous, while conforming to normality can stifle the essence of art, culture, and individuality.

From one Pepper Brooks to another:

 

Back to ignore.

[Geebrr]

13 minutes ago, bluto said:

It's only ad hominem if you consider being called "weird" an attack.

Calling me “intellectually bankrupt” would be an ad hominem attack. 

So here we are. 
 

Quite honestly I do not care what this guy thinks - I’ve never seen him say anything interesting or insightful.
 

 

 

[bluto]

2 minutes ago, Geebrr said:

Calling me “intellectually bankrupt” would be an ad hominem attack. 

So here we are. 
 

Quite honestly I do not care what this guy thinks - I’ve never seen him say anything interesting or insightful.
 

 

 

In general, or about football in particular?

His bit about culture and art was an interesting take.

[Geebrr]

Just now, bluto said:

In general, or about football in particular?

His bit about culture and art was an interesting take.

Football. 
 

 

I’m not seeking out his posts - so if he is talking about other stuff I’m not seeing it , or sad I’m missing it.