Jpan85 Posted March 18 Report Posted March 18 I would imagine no since it would cost way too much to maintain and the building probably was never designed to have grass. Noeller, JCon and rebusrankin 1 2
JCon Posted March 18 Report Posted March 18 14 minutes ago, Jpan85 said: I would imagine no since it would cost way too much to maintain and the building probably was never designed to have grass. I would also argue that maintaining the grass in the fall would be too challenging, with all the football that's played there. Easier for it to recover in summer, but not so much in fall. Noeller and Piggy 1 2
Rich Posted March 18 Report Posted March 18 44 minutes ago, JCon said: I would also argue that maintaining the grass in the fall would be too challenging, with all the football that's played there. Easier for it to recover in summer, but not so much in fall. And Valour FC plays into October as well. JCon and Piggy 1 1 1
WinnipegGordo Posted March 18 Report Posted March 18 1 hour ago, JCon said: Was at the stadium Friday night for the Bryant & Streveler talk. It was very exciting to see the work on the field. It was really worn out, so it was becoming a bit of an injury concern. I bet they're cutting it up to hand out to season ticket holders like they did with the turf at the old stadium. With the Goldeyes finally getting a new scoreboard it got me thinking. Will the Bombers ever upgrade their jumbotrons? It would great if they were replaced by larger versions at some point. rebusrankin, Piggy 1 and JCon 1 2
17to85 Posted March 18 Report Posted March 18 10 minutes ago, WinnipegGordo said: It would great if they were replaced by larger versions at some point. More room for ads! bryan35 and WinnipegGordo 2
Super Duper Negatron Posted March 18 Report Posted March 18 17 minutes ago, WinnipegGordo said: With the Goldeyes finally getting a new scoreboard it got me thinking. Will the Bombers ever upgrade their jumbotrons? It would great if they were replaced by larger versions at some point. Would love to not see replays on an even bigger screen! GCJenks, rebusrankin, Bubba Zanetti and 4 others 7
TrueBlue4ever Posted March 18 Report Posted March 18 Plenty of room on the existing screens if they would use them properly, instead of half with incorrect stats and ads. rebusrankin and bryan35 2
bigg jay Posted March 18 Report Posted March 18 1 hour ago, Super Duper Negatron said: Would love to not see replays on an even bigger screen! How about they bring back the closed captions? I always wonder what guys like Jay Detain or Rory Dough Alert are up to these days. Super Duper Negatron and MOBomberFan 1 1
WinnipegGordo Posted March 18 Report Posted March 18 Bombers sign Larnel Coleman. He's an American offensive tackle who was drafted in the 7th round of the 2021 NFL draft. He played 1 game in the NFL and played college at UMass. bb1, wbbfan, Stickem and 2 others 5
Noeller Posted March 18 Author Report Posted March 18 20 minutes ago, WinnipegGordo said: Bombers sign Larnel Coleman. He's an American offensive tackle who was drafted in the 7th round of the 2021 NFL draft. He played 1 game in the NFL and played college at UMass. 6'6" 310 sun-blocker..... https://www.nfl.com/players/larnel-coleman/ WinnipegGordo and wbbfan 2
rebusrankin Posted March 18 Report Posted March 18 4 hours ago, TrueBlue4ever said: Plenty of room on the existing screens if they would use them properly, instead of half with incorrect stats and ads. The CFL records stats? wbbfan, Pete Catan's Ghost and MOBomberFan 3
Goalie Posted March 19 Report Posted March 19 3 hours ago, WinnipegGordo said: Tell him to drop 30 pounds and there’s our defensive tackle
wbbfan Posted March 19 Report Posted March 19 15 hours ago, WinnipegGordo said: https://www.nfl.com/prospects/larnel-coleman/3200434f-4c29-6981-8da0-eb2a705b0aa8 https://nflcombineresults.com/playerpage.php?i=30686 Looks like a really good athlete, and excellent T prospect. Booch, Stickem, bb1 and 2 others 4 1
bluedawg Posted March 19 Report Posted March 19 I think Larnel Coleman's 36 1/4 inch arms give him the longest arms of any player in the CFL right now. Good get! https://draftscout.com/dsprofile.php?PlayerId=1024887&DraftYear=2021 Bigblue204, wbbfan and bb1 3
JuranBoldenRules Posted March 19 Report Posted March 19 (edited) I hope despite Bennett and Schmekel they realize they still need DL from this draft. Because there's a handful of really good ones. Athletic, rush end types and 3 tech types...some who played end in U Sports/NCAA. Need to replace Hansen/Maruo too not in terms of Global status but their reps. Edited March 19 by JuranBoldenRules JCon, rebusrankin, Piggy 1 and 2 others 3 2
Pete Posted March 19 Report Posted March 19 (edited) As Walters said, who we pick will have to beat out someone on our existing roster, our first round will likely be Oline after that it will likely be who can improve our roster the most. At our second pick. it will depend whose available on the dline that better than Bennet or Smeckle. Or if we go reciever whose better than Murphy. Edited March 20 by Pete
17to85 Posted March 19 Report Posted March 19 1 minute ago, Pete said: better than Bennet or Smeckle. Or if we go reciever whose better than Murphy Well that's not a super high bar wbbfan and rebusrankin 2
wbbfan Posted March 19 Report Posted March 19 1 hour ago, Pete said: As Walters said, wh we pick will have to beat out someone on our existing roster, our first round will like be Oline after that it will likely be who can improve our roster the most. At our second pick it will depend whose available on the dline that better than Bennet or Smeckle. Or if we go reciever whose better than Murphy. Except that hasn’t happened the last couple of drafts. Picking our type of guy is great, as long as they are an actual viable contributor at a position and not sts guy who doesn’t have the potential or ability to play a position. rebusrankin 1
rebusrankin Posted March 19 Report Posted March 19 They need to pick talented players with the potential to start not roster fillers like Bennet or Smeckle or guys who are just going to be STers. Piggy 1 and wbbfan 2
wbbfan Posted March 19 Report Posted March 19 50 minutes ago, rebusrankin said: They need to pick talented players with the potential to start not roster fillers like Bennet or Smeckle or guys who are just going to be STers. Yep. Cept neither is even good at teams lol. with this strong a top portion of a draft and soo many picks I’m sure walters will have his best draft in years. Noeller, rebusrankin, Stickem and 1 other 4
GCn20 Posted March 19 Report Posted March 19 (edited) 19 minutes ago, wbbfan said: Yep. Cept neither is even good at teams lol. with this strong a top portion of a draft and soo many picks I’m sure walters will have his best draft in years. Yea, that shouldn't be too tough. Two years ago he didn't have a first rounder and last year was just a bunk draft year. I don't think any team in this league is particularly stoked by their last 2 drafts. Edited March 19 by GCn20 wbbfan 1
Mike Posted March 20 Report Posted March 20 20 hours ago, Pete said: As Walters said, who we pick will have to beat out someone on our existing roster, our first round will likely be Oline after that it will likely be who can improve our roster the most. At our second pick. it will depend whose available on the dline that better than Bennet or Smeckle. Or if we go reciever whose better than Murphy. I’m pretty sure Walters could blindfold himself and throw darts at a John Hodge mock draft and end up with a better player than Tanner freakin Schmekel rebusrankin, Piggy 1 and JCon 1 2
Blue In BC Posted March 20 Report Posted March 20 21 hours ago, Pete said: As Walters said, who we pick will have to beat out someone on our existing roster, our first round will likely be Oline after that it will likely be who can improve our roster the most. At our second pick. it will depend whose available on the dline that better than Bennet or Smeckle. Or if we go reciever whose better than Murphy. A few draft choices may go back for their last year in college. A few will start the season on PR as development players. It wouldn't surprise me to see a couple of the 2024 draft choices actually make the AR. We've lost a few Canadians that spent most of 2023 on the AR, so there are some open spots. It also wouldn't surprise me to see a few Canadian depth players not make the roster in any form. So we'll see how our selections go. Previously I suggested that we might try and trade up since we have 10 selections this year. As an example, would we trade our # 8 & # 17 or # 20 for a top 5 draft pick? Just spit balling. Tracker and rebusrankin 2
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now