bluto Posted February 7 Report Posted February 7 45 minutes ago, rebusrankin said: Hey, I got a tinted visor and not only did it not make me faster, it caused a concussion. Granted the concussion was from running into a brick wall. You have to install the tinted visor on a helmet before checking a wall's structural integrity.
rebusrankin Posted February 7 Report Posted February 7 6 minutes ago, bluto said: You have to install the tinted visor on a helmet before checking a wall's structural integrity. I did. That's why I hit the wall. Tinted visor caused me not to see it.
bluto Posted February 7 Report Posted February 7 Just now, rebusrankin said: I did. That's why I hit the wall. Tinted visor caused me not to see it. I thought you just did it with the visor.
Wanna-B-Fanboy Posted February 7 Report Posted February 7 39 minutes ago, Geebrr said: Coxie re-signs with TO. 1 year @ $160k That is a friendly price... Tracker and rebusrankin 1 1
HardCoreBlue Posted February 7 Report Posted February 7 2 hours ago, rebusrankin said: I am still picking Toronto to win the East. Got your back @bluto Get a room. Argos suck. Fatty Liver, Noeller, 17to85 and 4 others 1 2 4
bluto Posted February 7 Report Posted February 7 3 minutes ago, Wanna-B-Fanboy said: That is a friendly price... You think? I think Coxie did very well on that.
Wanna-B-Fanboy Posted February 7 Report Posted February 7 2 minutes ago, bluto said: You think? I think Coxie did very well on that. I thought he would go at least $180k even pushing to $200k. He's a baller, young and I don't think he's hit his ceiling yet. Geebrr 1
Geebrr Posted February 7 Report Posted February 7 6 minutes ago, bluto said: You think? I think Coxie did very well on that. I think it is paying for what he can do - and he looks like he has some ability and attributes that are hard to find 4 minutes ago, Wanna-B-Fanboy said: I thought he would go at least $180k even pushing to $200k. He's a baller, young and I don't think he's hit his ceiling yet. I think the contract is about what he deserves - but agree on the ceiling thing. Wanna-B-Fanboy 1
bluto Posted February 7 Report Posted February 7 1 minute ago, Wanna-B-Fanboy said: I thought he would go at least $180k even pushing to $200k. He's a baller, young and I don't think he's hit his ceiling yet. Oh I agree about his potential. But his resume is pretty thin. He was a PR guy that had the fortune to become Kelly's favorite target when they were both backups. Wanna-B-Fanboy 1
Geebrr Posted February 7 Report Posted February 7 1 minute ago, bluto said: Oh I agree about his potential. But his resume is pretty thin. He was a PR guy that had the fortune to become Kelly's favorite target when they were both backups. I mean…bringing your starting QB’s favourite target back is value in of itself. Wanna-B-Fanboy and bluto 2
HardCoreBlue Posted February 7 Report Posted February 7 48 minutes ago, Noeller said: Oh it would be so nice to see the Argos or Sasky pay Betts over 280k. Bigblue204, Noeller, wbbfan and 1 other 3 1
SpeedFlex27 Posted February 7 Report Posted February 7 Betts is so one dimensional. A strreaky pass rush end only. Lousy against containing the run inside. sask or BC can have him & overpay. With the money we have we should be able to bring in some DL help as well as linebacker. We need to shore up our defense. Bubba Zanetti, JohnnyAbonny, Tracker and 1 other 3 1
johnzo Posted February 7 Report Posted February 7 5 hours ago, Fatty Liver said: Wow, the Stamps QB well is drying up faster than the aquifers East of the rockies. I got curious.... In the last twenty years, the only Calgary QBs who were not first recruited into the league by the Stamps were Glenn in 2012-2013 and McManus in 2006. that's a pretty amazing run of homegrown QBs. wbbfan, Noeller, Fatty Liver and 1 other 4
Geebrr Posted February 8 Report Posted February 8 35 minutes ago, johnzo said: I got curious.... In the last twenty years, the only Calgary QBs who were not first recruited into the league by the Stamps were Glenn in 2012-2013 and McManus in 2006. that's a pretty amazing run of homegrown QBs. Definitely not the case. I can think of Khari Jones in 2004, and Drew Tate as at least two more. On 2/6/2024 at 4:31 PM, Bigblue204 said: Honestly 135k per year doesn't seem like that bad of a deal for Houston. Would you change your mind if I told you that Nichols is making $140k? wbbfan and Noeller 2
johnzo Posted February 8 Report Posted February 8 16 minutes ago, Geebrr said: Definitely not the case. I can think of Khari Jones in 2004, and Drew Tate as at least two more. good catch. I thought Tate was recruited by the Stamps, but yeah he was a Roughrider originally.
Booch Posted February 8 Report Posted February 8 49 minutes ago, Geebrr said: Definitely not the case. I can think of Khari Jones in 2004, and Drew Tate as at least two more. Would you change your mind if I told you that Nichols is making $140k? Nichols is the best or top 2 dbs in the league....Houston is not...far from a top db...The fact he paid at par with Nichols is a joke JohnnyAbonny, Noeller, Stickem and 2 others 5
GCn20 Posted February 8 Report Posted February 8 16 hours ago, bluto said: You think? I think Coxie did very well on that. I also think Coxie did well. Not outrageous or anything but it was not a deal either.
Geebrr Posted February 8 Report Posted February 8 12 hours ago, Booch said: Nichols is the best or top 2 dbs in the league....Houston is not...far from a top db...The fact he paid at par with Nichols is a joke I’d say so. Noeller 1
Colin Unger Posted February 8 Report Posted February 8 Speaking of top DB's today is the day that the NFL option window closes. I guess Holm is officially coming back? JohnnyAbonny, Stickem, wbbfan and 1 other 2 2
Bigblue204 Posted February 8 Report Posted February 8 13 hours ago, Geebrr said: Definitely not the case. I can think of Khari Jones in 2004, and Drew Tate as at least two more. Would you change your mind if I told you that Nichols is making $140k? No. That makes the deal make more sense. Nichols is better, and didn't just sign a new contract, and is still making more. Geebrr 1
Booch Posted February 8 Report Posted February 8 18 minutes ago, Bigblue204 said: No. That makes the deal make more sense. Nichols is better, and didn't just sign a new contract, and is still making more. Nichols resigned before Jan....I believe....before tampering period anyway JohnnyAbonny 1
bigg jay Posted February 8 Report Posted February 8 24 minutes ago, Booch said: Nichols resigned before Jan....I believe....before tampering period anyway Yup, he signed a new 2 year deal just before Christmas. Noeller and Colin Unger 1 1
Bigblue204 Posted February 8 Report Posted February 8 26 minutes ago, Booch said: Nichols resigned before Jan....I believe....before tampering period anyway Well, good on him for taking less Tracker 1
GCn20 Posted February 8 Report Posted February 8 1 hour ago, Colin Unger said: Speaking of top DB's today is the day that the NFL option window closes. I guess Holm is officially coming back? If he doesn't get an offer I believe he is under contract. Stickem and wbbfan 2
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now