Colin Unger Posted June 2 Report Posted June 2 Did they get rid of the dev roster or something? I remember when they brought it in and don't remember when they got rid of it.
Mike Posted June 2 Author Report Posted June 2 Just now, bluedawg said: Who is the british one?! I thought it was two German guys Lucky OG Just now, Colin Unger said: Did they get rid of the dev roster or something? I remember when they brought it in and don't remember when they got rid of it. Are you having a fever dream? I genuinely don’t remember anything like this ever. do you mean the gameday scratches?
JuranBoldenRules Posted June 2 Report Posted June 2 2 minutes ago, bluedawg said: Who is the british one?! I thought it was two German guys Think he's actually Austrian on second glance. wbbfan and bluedawg 2
bluedawg Posted June 2 Report Posted June 2 (edited) Lucky OG, I thought he did well on specials. Also saw him playing DE and beat Calgary's starting OT on one play. I think he's a sleeper to be a legitimate contributor next season Edited June 2 by bluedawg
Fatty Liver Posted June 2 Report Posted June 2 2 minutes ago, Mike said: Lucky OG Are you having a fever dream? I genuinely don’t remember anything like this ever. do you mean the gameday scratches? Sounds like he's referring to the old taxi squad.
Colin Unger Posted June 2 Report Posted June 2 From ChatGTP "Yes, the Canadian Football League (CFL) used to have something called a developmental roster. The developmental roster was a list of additional players that teams could keep beyond their regular roster limits. These players were typically younger or less experienced individuals who were considered to have potential for future development. The purpose of the developmental roster was to allow teams to retain and develop promising talent without those players occupying spots on the main roster. The specific rules and number of spots allocated for the developmental roster could vary over time, and the concept itself might have been adjusted or renamed as the league evolved. The concept of a developmental roster in the CFL was officially introduced in 1995. This was part of the league's efforts to foster and develop young talent by allowing teams to keep a set number of additional players who did not count against the main roster limit. The developmental roster provided a space for younger or less experienced players to grow and improve their skills with the team while not being part of the active game-day roster." My God was it that long ago when it was brought in? That's one year before ourbombers.com went live.
BBlink Posted June 2 Report Posted June 2 Jamal Woods. Now again, I was more focused on my beer than the game at times. I can see why they kept him. #91 was making a lot of plays out there. He's listed as a DT but I believe he was playing a lot of DE in the game. We will need that. We can't have 5 million defensive tackles. BigBlueFanatic 1
Super Duper Negatron Posted June 2 Report Posted June 2 (edited) 7 minutes ago, Mike said: Lucky OG Are you having a fever dream? I genuinely don’t remember anything like this ever. do you mean the gameday scratches? That's what he means. Edited June 2 by Super Duper Negatron
Goalie Posted June 2 Report Posted June 2 1 minute ago, Colin Unger said: From ChatGTP "Yes, the Canadian Football League (CFL) used to have something called a developmental roster. The developmental roster was a list of additional players that teams could keep beyond their regular roster limits. These players were typically younger or less experienced individuals who were considered to have potential for future development. The purpose of the developmental roster was to allow teams to retain and develop promising talent without those players occupying spots on the main roster. The specific rules and number of spots allocated for the developmental roster could vary over time, and the concept itself might have been adjusted or renamed as the league evolved. The concept of a developmental roster in the CFL was officially introduced in 1995. This was part of the league's efforts to foster and develop young talent by allowing teams to keep a set number of additional players who did not count against the main roster limit. The developmental roster provided a space for younger or less experienced players to grow and improve their skills with the team while not being part of the active game-day roster." My God was it that long ago when it was brought in? That's one year before ourbombers.com went live. Sounds like the start of dementia to me dude. Colin Unger 1
Super Duper Negatron Posted June 2 Report Posted June 2 1 minute ago, Colin Unger said: From ChatGTP "Yes, the Canadian Football League (CFL) used to have something called a developmental roster. The developmental roster was a list of additional players that teams could keep beyond their regular roster limits. These players were typically younger or less experienced individuals who were considered to have potential for future development. The purpose of the developmental roster was to allow teams to retain and develop promising talent without those players occupying spots on the main roster. The specific rules and number of spots allocated for the developmental roster could vary over time, and the concept itself might have been adjusted or renamed as the league evolved. The concept of a developmental roster in the CFL was officially introduced in 1995. This was part of the league's efforts to foster and develop young talent by allowing teams to keep a set number of additional players who did not count against the main roster limit. The developmental roster provided a space for younger or less experienced players to grow and improve their skills with the team while not being part of the active game-day roster." My God was it that long ago when it was brought in? That's one year before ourbombers.com went live. That is the practice roster you quoted. Don't under.any circumstance ever quote ChatGPT for facts. bigg jay, WildPath, Noeller and 5 others 3 5
BBlink Posted June 2 Report Posted June 2 We legitimately have 10 defensive linemen on the AR Fox, Adams, Thomas, Schmekel, Samson, Lawson, Garbutt, Jefferson, Woods, Haba. Lawson is for sure hurt. Garbutt probably too. Gotta think there's at least one other that's going to the IR. Thomas? Jesse, BigBlueFanatic and wbbfan 3
JuranBoldenRules Posted June 2 Report Posted June 2 4 minutes ago, BBlink said: We legitimately have 10 defensive linemen on the AR Fox, Adams, Thomas, Schmekel, Samson, Lawson, Garbutt, Jefferson, Woods, Haba. Lawson is for sure hurt. Garbutt probably too. Gotta think there's at least one other that's going to the IR. Thomas? They could dress 8. Piggy 1 1
Mike Posted June 2 Author Report Posted June 2 5 minutes ago, BBlink said: We legitimately have 10 defensive linemen on the AR Fox, Adams, Thomas, Schmekel, Samson, Lawson, Garbutt, Jefferson, Woods, Haba. Lawson is for sure hurt. Garbutt probably too. Gotta think there's at least one other that's going to the IR. Thomas? I also think we’re signing Bennett Piggy 1, Arnold_Palmer, BigBlueFanatic and 6 others 4 1 2 1 1
Goalie Posted June 2 Report Posted June 2 2 minutes ago, Mike said: I also think we’re signing Bennett Anthony or mason. ??
Mike Posted June 2 Author Report Posted June 2 Just now, Goalie said: Anthony or mason. ?? Sam (Mason, just based on a hunch)
JuranBoldenRules Posted June 2 Report Posted June 2 Just now, Goalie said: Anthony or mason. ?? Bennetts
Stickem Posted June 2 Report Posted June 2 Don't like the fact we have no returner....especially after dumping Janarion ....Maybe Smith hangs around but until then, I think we can count on starting deep in our end.....I don't remember Mitchell being talked about being the return guy or returning a punt in the preseason...Lots of gambling with that position going on here
Mike Posted June 2 Author Report Posted June 2 Just now, Stickem said: Don't like the fact we have no returner....especially after dumping Janarion ....Maybe Smith hangs around but until then, I think we can count on starting deep in our end.....I don't remember Mitchell being talked about being the return guy or returning a punt in the preseason...Lots of gambling with that position going on here There are quite a few options. Bonds, Mitchell can both do it. We’ll probably send Augustine out there though. Tracker and Piggy 1 1 1
Stickem Posted June 2 Report Posted June 2 2 minutes ago, Goalie said: Anthony or mason. ?? I pray it's Mason.....but ya never know lol....IF we do pick up 'Mason' ....local guy and talent can't be bad
JuranBoldenRules Posted June 2 Report Posted June 2 1 minute ago, Mike said: There are quite a few options. Bonds, Mitchell can both do it. We’ll probably send Augustine out there though. With a giant baseball glove. Noeller, Piggy 1, Stickem and 1 other 4
Atomic Posted June 2 Report Posted June 2 Projected depth chart: Mike, GCJenks, MrFreakzilla and 2 others 2 3
Jpan85 Posted June 2 Report Posted June 2 Not shocked about Smith he was grabbing his leg after one of his last carries. BigBlueFanatic 1
JuranBoldenRules Posted June 2 Report Posted June 2 1 minute ago, Atomic said: Projected depth chart: I think Wilson will mostly be in the middle. But Gauthier will play lots too. Basically only need 1-2 Canadians on the field on D any given down. So should see lots of the American guys out there in different roles too....Bridges and Ayers, DL can rotate pretty freely if Ford is an every down player. BBlink 1
Atomic Posted June 2 Report Posted June 2 Just now, JuranBoldenRules said: I think Wilson will mostly be in the middle. But Gauthier will play lots too. Basically only need 1-2 Canadians on the field on D any given down. So should see lots of the American guys out there in different roles too....Bridges and Ayers, DL can rotate pretty freely if Ford is an every down player. Yeah I'm not sure what's going to happen in the secondary. Can Kelly back up Ford at corner? With the way the roster is constructed it kinda looks like we might start 4 American DBs and Ford plays the dimeback role. Wilson at MLB and Ayers at WLB would be nice.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now