Atomic Posted July 30 Report Posted July 30 We could actually start five American OL without changing the ratio. Demski, Woli, Oliveira, Clercius, Ford, Kramdi, and Thomas would still be our starting 7 Canadians and Stanley Bryant, Willie Jefferson, Bighill, or BA could all count as the 8th (nationalized American). Not that we even have 5 American OL in house... Just saying it's possible. Booch, voodoochylde, rebusrankin and 2 others 5
CrazyCanuck89 Posted July 30 Report Posted July 30 1 hour ago, Atomic said: We could actually start five American OL without changing the ratio. Demski, Woli, Oliveira, Clercius, Ford, Kramdi, and Thomas would still be our starting 7 Canadians and Stanley Bryant, Willie Jefferson, Bighill, or BA could all count as the 8th (nationalized American). Not that we even have 5 American OL in house... Just saying it's possible. No need to start 5 American Olinemen. Wallace and Eli should be given chances first. Wallace is the future at RG and should replace Neufeld this season. 1 hour ago, Booch said: we could go Bryant...Eli at center...some stud import guard...the best of Wallace/Dobson at other....Keep Lofton and if we start Woli/Demski/BO as well then we only need Ford as a "starter", and a guy on every down rotating at either SAM...or on Dline...Heck even give Kramdi some safety reps...or morph him into a safety....easily doable We dont have to be running out sets with 2 National dlineman...and Kramdi...and Ford.....and sometimes 3 national Dlineman....That whole way we been doing things is pointless....dumb....and sacrifices talent and an aggressive defense for......man I dont even know what for other than an Osh preference Kramdi is fine at SAM. He proved you wrong last game. Booch 1
Brandon Posted July 30 Report Posted July 30 Just now, CrazyCanuck89 said: No need to start 5 American Olinemen. Wallace and Eli should be given chances first. Wallace is the future at RG and should replace Neufeld this season. It could only help Wallace in his growth and give Neufeld some rest so "if" by some chance we make the play offs he will be more healthy to play. Piggy 1 1
CrazyCanuck89 Posted July 30 Report Posted July 30 Just now, Brandon said: It could only help Wallace in his growth and give Neufeld some rest so "if" by some chance we make the play offs he will be more healthy to play. I would sit Neufeld in the playoffs, for the younger Wallace.
Nolby Posted July 30 Report Posted July 30 2 minutes ago, CrazyCanuck89 said: I would sit Neufeld in the playoffs, for the younger Wallace. Playoffs? You're talking about PLAYOFFS?!?!?!?! BigBlueFanatic, IC Khari, TBURGESS and 5 others 8
Brandon Posted July 30 Report Posted July 30 2 minutes ago, CrazyCanuck89 said: I would sit Neufeld in the playoffs, for the younger Wallace. I guess I should of said in case Neufeld needs to step in for a struggling Wallace...
IC Khari Posted July 30 Report Posted July 30 2 minutes ago, Nolby said: Playoffs? You're talking about PLAYOFFS?!?!?!?! Ah this never gets old LOL ... M.Silverback, JohnnyAbonny and GCJenks 3
Nolby Posted July 30 Report Posted July 30 13 minutes ago, IC Khari said: Ah this never gets old LOL ... Im only turning 40 this year and have no clue how to insert a gif on a web page. Its a miracle I can even feed myself. Bubba Zanetti, WildPath and bb1 3
Booch Posted July 30 Report Posted July 30 1 hour ago, CrazyCanuck89 said: No need to start 5 American Olinemen. Wallace and Eli should be given chances first. Wallace is the future at RG and should replace Neufeld this season. Kramdi is fine at SAM. He proved you wrong last game. One great game doesn't make a career or justify the use...he has had more sub par and poor games than great ones...now if that was the norm...sure...but it isn't...and I bet we dont see another game like that again but will see many of what we have seen up to that point
17to85 Posted July 30 Report Posted July 30 1 minute ago, Booch said: One great game doesn't make a career or justify the use...he has had more sub par and poor games than great ones...now if that was the norm...sure...but it isn't...and I bet we dont see another game like that again but will see many of what we have seen up to that point He is nowhere near as bad as you think. Allstars? Nope. As a 7th starting Canadian fine. Problem is we have about 3 or 4 7th starting Canadians. GCJenks and JCon 1 1
Booch Posted July 30 Report Posted July 30 (edited) 4 minutes ago, 17to85 said: He is nowhere near as bad as you think. Allstars? Nope. As a 7th starting Canadian fine. Problem is we have about 3 or 4 7th starting Canadians. yeah...if we needed a 7th...and it was the only option...sure....but we dont need him as the 7th...we can do better there....choose not too...and pay a baffling amount for him....whereas that money would/could have been used elsewhere Pick a team in the league that would say I wish we had Kramdi in at SAM for us over who we have.....good luck I'll go even further....show mer a team that would use/take Thomas over whomever else they use for 80 percent of snaps in a game....who would swap Kolo for their center one for one.....I can't see any team taking our punter over who they have. Who would swap Biggie for their MLB.....Maybe one team would take BA over their guy....Who would scoop Case...Mitchel...Johnson off the scrap heap and start them.... There a reason we are sitting at 2-5...and lucky to be at that record to be honest.... Edited July 30 by Booch rebusrankin 1
Goalie Posted July 30 Report Posted July 30 (edited) But you need 7 Canadian starters and we don’t have anyone better than kramdi who can take a spot. He’s not our worst Canadian starter that’s for sure. You can’t just replace Canadian starters with Americans. The ratio is a thing. You know who gets burned more than kramdi? Ford Thomas neufeld kolo Edited July 30 by Goalie
17to85 Posted July 30 Report Posted July 30 Let's put it this way... I'd use less Canadians on the Dl and Ol before I took Kramdi out. blue85gold, MOBomberFan, Colin Unger and 4 others 7
Colin Unger Posted July 30 Report Posted July 30 Let's face it. We're wasting our time worrying about the defensive starters at this point. We need to fix the offence and fast. Piggy 1 1
17to85 Posted July 30 Report Posted July 30 10 minutes ago, Colin Unger said: Let's face it. We're wasting our time worrying about the defensive starters at this point. We need to fix the offence and fast. That does a disservice. We can talk about both. The defense is playing pretty good but it could be better if they shore up the middle of the D. Would take some pressure off the offense if they get better. Mark H. and Colin Unger 1 1
JCon Posted July 30 Report Posted July 30 10 minutes ago, 17to85 said: That does a disservice. We can talk about both. The defense is playing pretty good but it could be better if they shore up the middle of the D. Would take some pressure off the offense if they get better. I want the freedom to complain about ALL areas of this team. MOBomberFan, 17to85, Noeller and 5 others 1 1 5 1
Pete Posted July 30 Report Posted July 30 8 minutes ago, JCon said: I want the freedom to complain about ALL areas of this team. Its about priorities even if we were 6 and 2, we would find things to complain about but its the offence thats costing us games and needs to be addressed more agressively
blueingreenland Posted July 30 Report Posted July 30 Any news from practice today? Any changes on O line, receivers? Ahhh....one can only hope.
blue85gold Posted July 30 Report Posted July 30 34 minutes ago, 17to85 said: That does a disservice. We can talk about both. The defense is playing pretty good but it could be better if they shore up the middle of the D. Would take some pressure off the offense if they get better. The D has been solid but we could really is some more big plays and turn overs from them. Noeller 1
Noeller Posted July 30 Author Report Posted July 30 Rather than "lucky to be 2-6" I actually think we could just as easily be 6-2 with a few breaks going our way. We were good/deep enough to win those games in the past, and now we're just good enough to lose this year... bb1, 17to85 and MOBomberFan 2 1
Super Duper Negatron Posted July 30 Report Posted July 30 9 minutes ago, Noeller said: Rather than "lucky to be 2-6" I actually think we could just as easily be 6-2 with a few breaks going our way. We were good/deep enough to win those games in the past, and now we're just good enough to lose this year... Edmonton has been telling themselves that for 3 seasons. TBURGESS 1
Slimy Sculpin Posted July 30 Report Posted July 30 2 hours ago, CrazyCanuck89 said: No need to start 5 American Olinemen. Wallace and Eli should be given chances first. Wallace is the future at RG and should replace Neufeld this season. Kramdi is fine at SAM. He proved you wrong last game. Granted, Kramdi played well last game especially in the first half. However, he has not been fine at that position in the previous games. Booch and rebusrankin 2
Atomic Posted July 30 Report Posted July 30 22 minutes ago, blueingreenland said: Any news from practice today? Any changes on O line, receivers? Ahhh....one can only hope. Closed practice today
Brandon Posted July 30 Report Posted July 30 Confirmed Bighill is no longer an issue on D as per Facebook and the comments below that post. MOBomberFan, BomberBall., Noeller and 5 others 8
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now