Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
19 minutes ago, rebusrankin said:

Guy is a douchebag but his actions lead to us getting Streveler and Biggie and that helped us win the cup in 2019 so I can't totally hate him.

And he can’t retire as a rider. 

Posted
15 hours ago, wbbfan said:

Nope. Maybe if he coughs up 30k, with interest though… lol 

so out of curiosity, how does that work? because he bailed on his contractual obligation to the Bombers, he is still Bombers property? Wouldn't retirement just negate that? or does that mean he cannot sign a one day contract because he is still under contract with the Bombers?

Posted
19 minutes ago, bearpants said:

so out of curiosity, how does that work? because he bailed on his contractual obligation to the Bombers, he is still Bombers property? Wouldn't retirement just negate that? or does that mean he cannot sign a one day contract because he is still under contract with the Bombers?

That is correct. He retired suspended with a contract dispute. Retiring from suspended list would just have him return to the suspended list. Otherwise guys could abuse retirement left right and centre. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Stickem said:

That jerk refused to return the cash........let him sit in the suspended/retirement list till he returns his ill begotten gain

Waited till the very last minute strung us along even into camp, which is bad enough. BUT if he had decided it was right then called it and returned the cash, fine, thats the risk you run with an old guy. But stealing that roster bonus and refusing to show was soo low. Screw that guy. 

Posted

Don't like to mock an injured player but man, the football gods sure got Stubblefield for twisting Streveler's ankle. Stubblefield moaning that he isn't that kind of player was just so much bullshit. He can say whatever he wants but he got caught. Sorry, he suffered  an injury but not totally sorry. 

Posted
9 hours ago, JohnnyAbonny said:

I don’t want to be the broken record again (but i’m going to anyway) Fox and Haba wouldn’t be as huge of a loss if we’d had Woods on the roster where he should be

Should’ve had both woods and a de back up on the roster. 

Posted
1 hour ago, rebusrankin said:

Ottawa had 8 DL,  according to their depth charts Edmonton is going with 8 and Montreal with 7 tonight but we go with 6. 🙄

And Montreal rotates the most of any team. 7 for them is 7 guys who will play a decent chunk of reps. 
 

9 minutes ago, JohnnyAbonny said:

But we had 2 extra O-linemen to play TE, and 2 fullbacks. 

not enough navy seals. 

Posted
3 hours ago, rebusrankin said:

Ottawa had 8 DL,  according to their depth charts Edmonton is going with 8 and Montreal with 7 tonight but we go with 6. 🙄

and no real rotational guy for end...a guy out of position isnt the answer....we just luckyAdams is a right stud and can play any spot and excell there

 

2 hours ago, JohnnyAbonny said:

But we had 2 extra O-linemen to play TE, and 2 fullbacks. 

thats how you craft awesomeness....especially when you ignore using the Nationlized American rule...makes it super awesome

Posted
8 minutes ago, Booch said:

and no real rotational guy for end...a guy out of position isnt the answer....we just luckyAdams is a right stud and can play any spot and excell there

 

thats how you craft awesomeness....especially when you ignore using the Nationlized American rule...makes it super awesome

“We’ve got a lot of good players. They’re good…they’re just….really good” 

-MOS actually 

Posted
45 minutes ago, JohnnyAbonny said:

“We’ve got a lot of good players. They’re good…they’re just….really good” 

-MOS actually 

And he's right... we do have a lot of really good players. Now, do we have a functional team?

Posted
Just now, 17to85 said:

And he's right... we do have a lot of really good players. Now, do we have a functional team?

or a functional HC in how to utilze them...

Posted
41 minutes ago, Booch said:

or a functional HC in how to utilze them...

Well that was the point of what I was saying. You need a good roster not a collection of good players

Posted
24 minutes ago, 17to85 said:

Well that was the point of what I was saying. You need a good roster not a collection of good players

I know...I was augmenting it lol

Posted
9 hours ago, JohnnyAbonny said:

But we had 2 extra O-linemen to play TE, and 2 fullbacks. 

Now...there could be some max protect...perhaps. Na, let's just roster them.

Posted
1 hour ago, Mark H. said:

Now...there could be some max protect...perhaps. Na, let's just roster them.

How much protection do you need? 3/4 of your team blocking and schoen has to try and get open 1 on 3?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...