TBURGESS Posted August 17 Report Posted August 17 53 minutes ago, Mike said: I honestly thought it was obvious he was out and the TSN team just did a horrendous job of picking what still images to use I think TSN chose the still images based on the call, not the other way around. Bigblue204 1
Sard Posted August 17 Report Posted August 17 26 minutes ago, TBURGESS said: I think TSN chose the still images based on the call, not the other way around. They were showing it before the call from the CC came in, so that's not likely.
Booch Posted August 17 Report Posted August 17 That play was a classic example of a call made on the field...not having evidence to change it...hopefully moving forward they can maintain this...he definitely was inbounds...can't dispute that...the cut tho...no clear evidence so u have to side with the call blue85gold and Bigblue204 2
17to85 Posted August 17 Report Posted August 17 8 minutes ago, Booch said: That play was a classic example of a call made on the field...not having evidence to change it...hopefully moving forward they can maintain this...he definitely was inbounds...can't dispute that...the cut tho...no clear evidence so u have to side with the call That's exactly how it is. Whatever the call on the field I don't believe there was conclusive evidence to over turn. How it should be. None of this game management interpretive review nonsense. Bigblue204, blue85gold, wpgallday1960 and 1 other 3 1
SpeedFlex27 Posted August 17 Report Posted August 17 8 hours ago, JohnnyAbonny said: Not so much a stab in the back imo, more of a case of the Als needing to choose the more skilled or more promising player. Same with Adams, it’s not a stab in the back. Guy had a terrible game, then got hurt (like he always does). BC’s trying for a home GC. If I was a Lions fan, I’d be livid if they passed on Rourke because of “loyalty” to VA. Pro sports is a business. It does suck sometimes. 40 minutes ago, 17to85 said: That's exactly how it is. Whatever the call on the field I don't believe there was conclusive evidence to over turn. How it should be. None of this game management interpretive review nonsense. Cryder fans being cryders. As Roy Kent would say, "*****"!!!!!! JohnnyAbonny 1
Bigblue204 Posted August 18 Report Posted August 18 22 hours ago, Wanna-B-Fanboy said: All I know, is that if that was the call for the Bombers opponent... there would be a seriously different tune Around these parts. I would feel exactly the same. I've said it before against the Bombers, command centre can't over rule calls when they're that close. Evidence has to be clear.
Wanna-B-Fanboy Posted August 18 Report Posted August 18 23 minutes ago, Bigblue204 said: I would feel exactly the same. I've said it before against the Bombers, command centre can't over rule calls when they're that close. Evidence has to be clear. Fair enough. But not most are as level headed as you are.
TBURGESS Posted August 18 Report Posted August 18 18 hours ago, Sard said: They were showing it before we heard the call from the CC came in, so that's not likely. TSN knows the calls before they are announced.
17to85 Posted August 19 Report Posted August 19 On 2024-08-16 at 10:27 PM, greenrider55 said: I’m just not ready to anoint them the best in the league, the shutout against BC was very impressive, let’s see if they do it again. Atomic, rebusrankin, Noeller and 1 other 1 3
SpeedFlex27 Posted August 20 Report Posted August 20 On 2024-08-17 at 10:58 AM, Wanna-B-Fanboy said: All I know, is that if that was the call for the Bombers opponent... there would be a seriously different tune Around these parts. We all enjoy when Rider fans suffer. It's so.... calming. Tracker 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now