Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
  On 2024-09-02 at 2:51 AM, Bubba Zanetti said:

Little bit concerned that our D got carved up pretty good by Harris but glad we got the ugly win!

Expand  

Once we had an offense that got what, 3 first downs, in a half?

We do need someone to get around the edge and into the backfield though.

Not really sure what Haba brings.

Call up another American rush end type to play every week until you find a guy who's explosive. 

Posted
  On 2024-09-02 at 2:35 AM, Booch said:

Good thing he missed as it would have been for loss of yards...mind u it was second down anyway

If anything should have been illegal contact for 10 yards and even that was a stretch

Expand  

Calgary ran that crap a lot when the challenge first came in.  They would have a receiver truck a DB on the opposite side of the field on 3rd and long, and if they didn't make the play, they would challenge for illegal contact on the other side of the field.  This play reminded me so much of that.

Posted
  On 2024-09-02 at 3:01 AM, Sard said:

Calgary ran that crap a lot when the challenge first came in.  They would have a receiver truck a DB on the opposite side of the field on 3rd and long, and if they didn't make the play, they would challenge for illegal contact on the other side of the field.  This play reminded me so much of that.

Expand  

And where did Mace come from??

Posted
  On 2024-09-02 at 3:01 AM, Sard said:

Calgary ran that crap a lot when the challenge first came in.  They would have a receiver truck a DB on the opposite side of the field on 3rd and long, and if they didn't make the play, they would challenge for illegal contact on the other side of the field.  This play reminded me so much of that.

Expand  

That's exactly what it was.  And Mace was there on Dickenson's staff.

They had no intent of completing a pass there.  The route was to charge the DB for contact and throw the ball at it.

That's why it was such an easy pick.

Posted
  On 2024-09-02 at 3:01 AM, Sard said:

Calgary ran that crap a lot when the challenge first came in.  They would have a receiver truck a DB on the opposite side of the field on 3rd and long, and if they didn't make the play, they would challenge for illegal contact on the other side of the field.  This play reminded me so much of that.

Expand  

I thought the same thing! 

Posted
  On 2024-09-02 at 3:05 AM, Wanna-B-Fanboy said:

No idea why they thought 30 fronts would do well against Harris- he totally shredded our defense today. Hell, I KNOW that the 30 front would have little success against Harris.

 

Hopefully Younger dials up something better next week 

Expand  

Wouldn't be so bad if we had guys actually collapsing the pocket and making him move.

We have Jefferson running past the pocket, Haba playing patty cake and Garbutt staying on the tackle's outside shoulder never leaving like we're playing Tre Ford who is going to escape and be able to do something.

Posted
  On 2024-09-02 at 2:54 AM, JuranBoldenRules said:

Once we had an offense that got what, 3 first downs, in a half?

We do need someone to get around the edge and into the backfield though.

Not really sure what Haba brings.

Call up another American rush end type to play every week until you find a guy who's explosive. 

Expand  

Not much. I feel like I’m crazy the way he gets lauded sometimes for doing absolutely nothing. 

Posted
  On 2024-09-02 at 3:56 AM, bustamente said:

Adams needs back on the roster next week, can't give Harris the time he had tonight next week. What does Johnson do apart from taking up a roster spot. 

Expand  

I'd take Adams over Haba.

Adams gets more pressure off the edge than Haba does.

If you're going to play a ton of 30 fronts anyway, Adams is a way better fit.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...