Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I like to rag on Sheehan...I'll use his name and not punter for this but lost in the win on that winning field goal was him coralling that low bad snap that hit the turf in front of him and getting it pinned to not screw Castillos timing on the kick...huge play

He will now be punter again until he amazes with punts

Posted
5 minutes ago, Booch said:

I like to rag on Sheehan...I'll use his name and not punter for this but lost in the win on that winning field goal was him coralling that low bad snap that hit the turf in front of him and getting it pinned to not screw Castillos timing on the kick...huge play

He will now be punter again until he amazes with punts

And an honourable mention to Demski who really righted the ship on fumbles this year. He locks it down tight every time now.

But why has Brady been all but benched in the last 2 games? You have any insight?

Posted
11 minutes ago, Booch said:

I like to rag on Sheehan...I'll use his name and not punter for this but lost in the win on that winning field goal was him coralling that low bad snap that hit the turf in front of him and getting it pinned to not screw Castillos timing on the kick...huge play

He will now be punter again until he amazes with punts

Agreed 

Holding = Sheehan

Punting = The Punter 

 

Posted
24 minutes ago, Deiter Fan said:

And an honourable mention to Demski who really righted the ship on fumbles this year. He locks it down tight every time now.

But why has Brady been all but benched in the last 2 games? You have any insight?

I have no insight. But just suspecting maybe a nagging injury from the start of the season and or just resting him up for playoffs? That’s my guess. 

Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, Bomber_fanaddict said:

I have no insight. But just suspecting maybe a nagging injury from the start of the season and or just resting him up for playoffs? That’s my guess. 

If it's an injury I suppose I can see it but then why not just sit him and let him heal properly for the postseason? Resting him with first on the line just seems counterproductive.

Edited by Deiter Fan
Posted
40 minutes ago, Booch said:

I like to rag on Sheehan...I'll use his name and not punter for this but lost in the win on that winning field goal was him coralling that low bad snap that hit the turf in front of him and getting it pinned to not screw Castillos timing on the kick...huge play

He will now be punter again until he amazes with punts

I understand. After a win a member of the Bomber punting team has a name.

His name is Jamieson Sheahan.

His name is Jamieson Sheahan.

His name is Jamieson Sheahan.

 

 

Posted (edited)

Blue wins first place with:

A 3 point lead over the second place team and advantage with winning the season series.

A 4 point lead over the third place team and advantage with winning the season series.

After losing the first four games, then a record of 2 - 6, and winning 9 of their final 10 games, they earn 1st.

And, the loss to Toronto 2 weeks ago, is now irrelevant. 
 

IMO, the Bombers might be the hottest team in the league. Each game this year has been meaningful. Not a bad way to host the Western Final. 

Edited by Rod Black
Posted
6 minutes ago, SectionKBlackout said:

Can someone explain to me why we didn't stop running a 3 man front the whole game? 

We did use a 40 a decent chunk. The real problem was the 2 Canadian dl with 3 or 4 and with multiple combinations of alignments (Jake once even at wide 5 tech) was all bad. The all imp 30 was good, would’ve been better if Adam’s wasn’t having to play nose when both fox and woods were banged up. 

Posted
47 minutes ago, Deiter Fan said:

And an honourable mention to Demski who really righted the ship on fumbles this year. He locks it down tight every time now.

But why has Brady been all but benched in the last 2 games? You have any insight?

I dont understand that either...especially when we seemed to load the lineup for a run attack...I think it's maybe preventative maintenance so come WF...he's balls to the wall

I do think tho with some tose short yardage under center hand offs to BO we doing that to set up a naked QB roll out around the end for an easy walk in the endzone, or a nice long gainer when it's just a regular second and short somewhere....the one dive on the goaline he could have moonwalked in....

7 minutes ago, SectionKBlackout said:

Can someone explain to me why we didn't stop running a 3 man front the whole game? 

my thoughts......it's because this staff gets too locked in and believes that from some success...that it's the only way to go...even when ugly shittyassed win gloss over the deficiency...we have seen it over and over in other areas

Just now, wbbfan said:

We did use a 40 a decent chunk. The real problem was the 2 Canadian dl with 3 or 4 and with multiple combinations of alignments (Jake once even at wide 5 tech) was all bad. The all imp 30 was good, would’ve been better if Adam’s wasn’t having to play nose when both fox and woods were banged up. 

yeah...the sets with Schmecthomas are just painful to watch....so inept and useless and we get gouged and gouged...stop it alreay

Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, wbbfan said:

With Kelly at S, and 3 total ni dbs starting, 3 starting ni ol, 2 wrs, and 1 rb we should never see 2 ni dl on the field at the same time. Take Kelly off for an imp and slam in one ni dt for a package 10-15 times a game. Other wise dl should be all imp. Especially when we run 30. 

based on roster...we should never see any until Lawson returns

@DTonOB do you know or can yu find out how many starting nationals we declare on each side of the ball for a game...

Edited by Booch
Posted
Just now, Booch said:

based on roster...we should never see any until Lawson returns

Yup. Honestly with Hubert next year and Samson. The only point to bring back schmek is to convert him to offence. Thomas shouldn’t play again. 
 

I like Adam’s a lot but he struggled in his snaps at 0 in the 30. He’s much better at 3i, or really any other dl tech. They’ve been using him more as an end this year than a nose and that’s a tough transition to just switch. 

Posted
19 minutes ago, wbbfan said:

We did use a 40 a decent chunk. The real problem was the 2 Canadian dl with 3 or 4 and with multiple combinations of alignments (Jake once even at wide 5 tech) was all bad. The all imp 30 was good, would’ve been better if Adam’s wasn’t having to play nose when both fox and woods were banged up. 

For a guy who’s only played a few games, Fox sure gets hurt a lot. 

Posted
4 hours ago, wbbfan said:

All good. I was lazy and copy pasted rather than typing it all out on my phone. I’ve been fighting auto correct on this new phone for a while. 
 

This is about the wildest end in a decade. 

I guess it’s the new Mother Nature taking over.  

Ok ok I’ll show myself out. 

I guess Sask won’t have any sugar tonight

Posted (edited)
36 minutes ago, Booch said:

I think it's maybe preventative maintenance so come WF...he's balls to the wall

That's quite the gamble considering we rely on him so often to win/grind out games. As the announcers love to say...Wpg's offence runs thru Brady.

Appreciate the response.

8 minutes ago, JohnnyAbonny said:

I guess Sask won’t have any sugar tonight

No sugar tonight in their coffee?
No sugar tonight in their tea?
No sugar to stand beside them?

No sugar to sweeten their revolting relationship with their cousin?

Edited by Deiter Fan
Posted
11 minutes ago, Deiter Fan said:

That's quite the gamble considering we rely on him so often to win/grind out games. As the announcers love to say...Wpg's offence runs thru Brady.

Appreciate the response.

No sugar tonight in their coffee?
No sugar tonight in their tea?
No sugar to stand beside them?

No sugar to sweeten their revolting relationship with their cousin?

thats good as most have no teeth and ones who do prob need to back off with the sugars

Posted
11 minutes ago, Deiter Fan said:

That's quite the gamble considering we rely on him so often to win/grind out games. As the announcers love to say...Wpg's offence runs thru Brady.

Appreciate the response.

No sugar tonight in their coffee?
No sugar tonight in their tea?
No sugar to stand beside them?

No sugar to sweeten their revolting relationship with their cousin?

 

2 minutes ago, Booch said:

thats good as most have no teeth and ones who do prob need to back off with the sugars

Did you know toothpaste was invented in sask? 
Anywhere else, they’d have called it teethpaste..

Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, Noeller said:

Man there's a lot of confidence around here considering that we've looked like hot steaming garbage for much of the last two games. Particularly alarming was how bad the defense was today. I definitely feel concerned going into the WF....

Speaking only for myself...I'm not at all confident...but I am old enough to know you have to take and appreciate enjoyment where/when you find it...cuz life can be a real b*tch sometimes.

Edited by Deiter Fan
Posted
Just now, Noeller said:

Man there's a lot of confidence around here considering that we've looked like hot steaming garbage for much of the last two games. Particularly alarming was how bad the defense was today. I definitely feel concerned going into the WF....

I'm not overly confident....for reasons mentioned again and again

We don't seem to learn real fast and it's an alarming trait...if our coaches can pull heads outta arse....then we should be oksy....we have failed 2 seasons in a row due to coaching....lets not make it 3

Posted
5 minutes ago, Noeller said:

Man there's a lot of confidence around here considering that we've looked like hot steaming garbage for much of the last two games. Particularly alarming was how bad the defense was today. I definitely feel concerned going into the WF....

I’m not really all that confident, I just can’t pass up an opportunity to make cheap Saskatchewan jokes. 

The interior OL alone negates any confidence I’d have. 

The Gracious Gust totally saved us pages and pages of talking about how godawful Kolo and Neufeld looked again. 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...