Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
7 minutes ago, blue85gold said:

I like our chances against BC or Sask at home in the cold. They’ve proven they can win tough grinding games. 

Home field hadn't been the advantage this year that it was in the past... And that's in the summer. We know what Zach turns into once it's cold. Even during Banjo Bowl, things weren't exactly rosy ... That's saying something. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Noeller said:

Home field hadn't been the advantage this year that it was in the past... And that's in the summer. We know what Zach turns into once it's cold. Even during Banjo Bowl, things weren't exactly rosy ... That's saying something. 

Don’t think it’ll be a blow out but they’ve won lots of close games by grinding it out. 
 

BC sucks in the cold and the riders ain’t all that great. 
 

Get through that game and then maybe we’ll get to see good Zach in the dome in the cup.

Posted
3 hours ago, Booch said:

we got robbed on that other T.O game as well on the pick 6....also Wilson had clearly broke the plane on that QB sneak as well.....

Agreed. And the spot strevys short yardage gain. 

Posted

The wind won it for us, but we never should have had a chance. When they took the ball in the endzone after the 61 yard miss, they should have run around until we put tackled them instead of running the ball out to the 19. That takes 5 seconds off the clock and puts the ball at the 40. Run two sweeps instead of up the middle take an additional 2 to 3 seconds each. Now they've burnt an extra 10 seconds AND they're at their 40 instead of the 20. Even a 20 yard punt is enough to keep us out of FG range and we don't have any time left on the clock anyway. 

Posted
16 minutes ago, Noeller said:

Home field hadn't been the advantage this year that it was in the past... And that's in the summer. We know what Zach turns into once it's cold. Even during Banjo Bowl, things weren't exactly rosy ... That's saying something. 

but we also know what the oline and BO morph into in the cold november rain....hopefully Buck remembers

Plus that crazy crowd affecting things...we saw it time and time again, and in less than ideal weather....I like our odds....if tho and only if our coaches have this team prepared....coached up.....like legit coached and not left to their own devices and self policing....and we utilize our weapons and pieces effectively

I think our only fear of losing is if our coaching fails us....again

Posted
Just now, TBURGESS said:

The wind won it for us, but we never should have had a chance. When they took the ball in the endzone after the 61 yard miss, they should have run around until we put tackled them instead of running the ball out to the 19. That takes 5 seconds off the clock and puts the ball at the 40. Run two sweeps instead of up the middle take an additional 2 to 3 seconds each. Now they've burnt an extra 10 seconds AND they're at their 40 instead of the 20. Even a 20 yard punt is enough to keep us out of FG range and we don't have any time left on the clock anyway. 

yup....Luck be a lady many a win for us....much to the denial around here....but win is a win....but the way we been getting a lot...isn't s recipe for success consistently....and when it really matters when a team we are playing is well coached...well prepared...and hungry....thankfully due to injury....we have a lot of hungry guys....if not for injury we would have a full set of entitled feeling players who figure they just need to show up....

Posted
54 minutes ago, Noeller said:

Yesterday felt like a "One last win for the season" kinda thing. Like that was our Grey Cup. I just get a vibe like we're gonna see all our bad traits come shining through in a couple weeks and be one and done...

We swept back to backs with both bc and sask... I have a ton of confidence in winning the west final. Problem is we've largely seen this team play like ass against the east.

Posted
3 minutes ago, TBURGESS said:

The wind won it for us, but we never should have had a chance. When they took the ball in the endzone after the 61 yard miss, they should have run around until we put tackled them instead of running the ball out to the 19. That takes 5 seconds off the clock and puts the ball at the 40. Run two sweeps instead of up the middle take an additional 2 to 3 seconds each. Now they've burnt an extra 10 seconds AND they're at their 40 instead of the 20. Even a 20 yard punt is enough to keep us out of FG range and we don't have any time left on the clock anyway. 

The 61 yarder was short and wide so he would have had to let it bounce to get it into the endzone. Could have bounced any direction so would have been a risk

Posted
1 minute ago, 17to85 said:

We swept back to backs with both bc and sask... I have a ton of confidence in winning the west final. Problem is we've largely seen this team play like ass against the east.

yup....we've shown what kind of team we can be this yr....warts and all.....good...and bad.....which team shows up for the WF...thats the big question....Hopefully all this reliance and insistence of hanging on to grizzled vets...some that should have been pooched 2 yrs ago already pays off...and hopefully we have something cooked up scheme wise we been sitting on all yr as for most part...especially on offence been less than inspiring

Just now, blue85gold said:

The 61 yarder was short and wide so he would have had to let it bounce to get it into the endzone. Could have bounced any direction so would have been a risk

true...that being said...that was the stupidest decision....yet not shocking to have made to kick a FG there....If we made it....would have gave MTL a lil over a minute to get into field goal range...and kick winner and way we were playig on defence....they would have.

We got lucky lucky lucky how it panned out....but we really should have went for it....did a fake punt or something for first time in eons, or even some kind of onside pooched punt to try and get ball back....something creative and with guts

Kicking a long range fg...in swirling wins....when he was already short on a shorter kick...plain dumb

Posted
1 hour ago, ddanger said:

I'm in the group of not very confident. Yes we've been winning, and yes we got jobbed in the Argo game, but I'm worried. I felt like we were playing a rather vanilla offensive game yesterday, and BTW is there anyone who doesn't know that we're throwing to 89 when we need a play?? Maybe we're saving some fancy plays for the playoffs, but we just gotta be better. And I agree that we gotta do something with the D line.

I am thinking we will be ok. I understand that buck and Younger wanted more of a vanilla game and not tip thier hands on what they have going on for the playoffs... that said, Buck and Zach were able to move the ball at the end when they needed to. That is encouraging.

Posted
58 minutes ago, blue85gold said:

Don’t think it’ll be a blow out but they’ve won lots of close games by grinding it out. 
 

BC sucks in the cold and the riders ain’t all that great. 
 

Get through that game and then maybe we’ll get to see good Zach in the dome in the cup.

BC sucks.

You don’t have to add ‘in the cold’.

Posted
53 minutes ago, blue85gold said:

The 61 yarder was short and wide so he would have had to let it bounce to get it into the endzone. Could have bounced any direction so would have been a risk

Tiny, tiny risk. The returner was 20+ yards closer to the ball than any of our players. If it bounces through the endzone, they still get it on the 40.

Posted
1 hour ago, TBURGESS said:

The wind won it for us, but we never should have had a chance. When they took the ball in the endzone after the 61 yard miss, they should have run around until we put tackled them instead of running the ball out to the 19. That takes 5 seconds off the clock and puts the ball at the 40. Run two sweeps instead of up the middle take an additional 2 to 3 seconds each. Now they've burnt an extra 10 seconds AND they're at their 40 instead of the 20. Even a 20 yard punt is enough to keep us out of FG range and we don't have any time left on the clock anyway. 

Maybe ,but the fact is, we were still in it with only 2 points difference. So lets not make it sound like we were outplayed. Total yards, 1st down TOP was all very close. Had we made the most of our red zone chances it wouldn't have been close

Posted
1 hour ago, Wanna-B-Fanboy said:

I am thinking we will be ok. I understand that buck and Younger wanted more of a vanilla game and not tip thier hands on what they have going on for the playoffs... that said, Buck and Zach were able to move the ball at the end when they needed to. That is encouraging.

They moved the ball day long. The problem isn't moving the ball, it's scoring tds. 

Posted

Montreal has a good team. Full stop. We went into a very tough place to win, and won. It was a road game against the league leading defending Champs. Not sure why anyone would think this win would or should be pretty, or why one would lose confidence in our team because of it?

15 minutes ago, Bigblue204 said:

They moved the ball day long. The problem isn't moving the ball, it's scoring tds. 

Against a very good Noel Thorpe defence in a cold weather windy game. This was prototypical fall weather CFL football.

Posted
Just now, GCn20 said:

Montreal has a good team. Full stop. We went into a very tough place to win, and won. It was a road game against the league leading defending Champs. Not sure why anyone would think this win would or should be pretty, or why one would lose confidence in our team because of it?

No kidding. Last 2 games were against probably the 2 best, well coached teams in the league. Bombers showed they can play against both of them. 

Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, GCn20 said:

Montreal has a good team. Full stop. We went into a very tough place to win, and won. It was a road game against the league leading defending Champs. Not sure why anyone would think this win would or should be pretty, or why one would lose confidence in our team because of it?

Against a very good Noel Thorpe defence in a cold weather windy game. This was prototypical fall weather CFL football.

Yes it had been a problem for a while now. Against good teams, they have a hard time putting up 7

Edited by Bigblue204

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...