Bombers at Als GDT

[Super Duper Negatron]

2 minutes ago, JCon said:

Going back to the end of the game and the wind storm, I found everything just played out perfectly, with Forde bringing up this crazy wind that was all-of-sudden pushing into the stadium, with the leaves following for the visual effect, a slight build-up in anticipation before the punt, and then the pooch. The drama could not have been better scripted. 

If someone put that in a movie script it would have been rejected immediately as "too much".

[Wanna-B-Fanboy]

3 hours ago, wbbfan said:

OT but I wish they’d add like 1-2k tickets for standing only in the rumhut area. I know a few people who are in that pack that’d love it. 

That would be a cool idea- I would start with 200 tickets and increase each year to see the effects on congestion in the concourse.

[TBURGESS]

3 hours ago, GCn20 said:

Nothing is as clear cut as TB would like to pretend it is. He won't acknowledge that their is inherent risk to letting that ball fall to the ground. 

I've acknowledged the inherent risk, but you're greatly over rating that risk. I'd say it's a 90% chance that they retain the ball in the endzone and take it on the 53.

Lets just say we won because of a gale force wind that came outta nowhere to give us the win. Does that story make you happier? 

[wbbfan]

1 hour ago, Wanna-B-Fanboy said:

That would be a cool idea- I would start with 200 tickets and increase each year to see the effects on congestion in the concourse.

That’d be a great way to roll it out! 

[GCn20]

57 minutes ago, TBURGESS said:

I've acknowledged the inherent risk, but you're greatly over rating that risk. I'd say it's a 90% chance that they retain the ball in the endzone and take it on the 53.

Lets just say we won because of a gale force wind that came outta nowhere to give us the win. Does that story make you happier? 

The gale force wind helped for sure.

[Deiter Fan]

10 hours ago, JCon said:

The drama could not have been better scripted

If it was a dramatization...and you scripted it that way...people would call it hokey/fantasy nonsense

Edited October 29 by Deiter Fan

[johnzo]

12 hours ago, Super Duper Negatron said:

If someone put that in a movie script it would have been rejected immediately as "too much".

yup.  truth is stranger than fiction because fiction usually has to make sense.

[bearpants]

On 2024-10-28 at 1:47 PM, JCon said:

Going back to the end of the game and the wind storm, I found everything just played out perfectly, with Forde bringing up this crazy wind that was all-of-sudden pushing into the stadium, with the leaves following for the visual effect, a slight build-up in anticipation before the punt, and then the pooch. The drama could not have been better scripted. 

both TSN and CJOB really nailed the call on that last play... I was listening at the time since I wasn't near a TV. 

[DTonOB]

On 2024-10-26 at 10:03 PM, Booch said:

based on roster...we should never see any until Lawson returns

@DTonOB do you know or can yu find out how many starting nationals we declare on each side of the ball for a game...

Here's what I have for this season for proper Canadians (O-D and total)

1: 6-4 T:10

2: 6-3 T:9

3: 6-3 T:9

4: 7-3 T:10

5: 7-3 T:10

6: 7-4 T:11

7: 7-3 T:10

8: 7-3 T:10

9: 5-3 T:8

10: 5-3 T:8

11: 5-4 T:9

12: 6-3 T:9

13: 6-4 T:10

14: 6-3 T:9

15: 6-3 T:9

16: 6-3 T:9

17: 6-3 T:9

18: 6-3 T:9

[Booch]

37 minutes ago, DTonOB said:

Here's what I have for this season for proper Canadians (O-D and total)

1: 6-4 T:10

2: 6-3 T:9

3: 6-3 T:9

4: 7-3 T:10

5: 7-3 T:10

6: 7-4 T:11

7: 7-3 T:10

8: 7-3 T:10

9: 5-3 T:8

10: 5-3 T:8

11: 5-4 T:9

12: 6-3 T:9

13: 6-4 T:10

14: 6-3 T:9

15: 6-3 T:9

16: 6-3 T:9

17: 6-3 T:9

18: 6-3 T:9

nice.....do you now tho what we had to have on each side of ball tho for the designation...like 6 on offence always...and only 1 on defence.....or 5...2.....