Super Duper Negatron Posted Monday at 06:49 PM Report Share Posted Monday at 06:49 PM 2 minutes ago, JCon said: Going back to the end of the game and the wind storm, I found everything just played out perfectly, with Forde bringing up this crazy wind that was all-of-sudden pushing into the stadium, with the leaves following for the visual effect, a slight build-up in anticipation before the punt, and then the pooch. The drama could not have been better scripted. If someone put that in a movie script it would have been rejected immediately as "too much". Deiter Fan, K-Shack, bigg jay and 4 others 2 1 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wanna-B-Fanboy Posted Monday at 07:23 PM Report Share Posted Monday at 07:23 PM 3 hours ago, wbbfan said: OT but I wish they’d add like 1-2k tickets for standing only in the rumhut area. I know a few people who are in that pack that’d love it. That would be a cool idea- I would start with 200 tickets and increase each year to see the effects on congestion in the concourse. wbbfan 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TBURGESS Posted Monday at 08:29 PM Report Share Posted Monday at 08:29 PM 3 hours ago, GCn20 said: Nothing is as clear cut as TB would like to pretend it is. He won't acknowledge that their is inherent risk to letting that ball fall to the ground. I've acknowledged the inherent risk, but you're greatly over rating that risk. I'd say it's a 90% chance that they retain the ball in the endzone and take it on the 53. Lets just say we won because of a gale force wind that came outta nowhere to give us the win. Does that story make you happier? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wbbfan Posted Monday at 09:05 PM Report Share Posted Monday at 09:05 PM 1 hour ago, Wanna-B-Fanboy said: That would be a cool idea- I would start with 200 tickets and increase each year to see the effects on congestion in the concourse. That’d be a great way to roll it out! Wanna-B-Fanboy 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GCn20 Posted Monday at 09:27 PM Report Share Posted Monday at 09:27 PM 57 minutes ago, TBURGESS said: I've acknowledged the inherent risk, but you're greatly over rating that risk. I'd say it's a 90% chance that they retain the ball in the endzone and take it on the 53. Lets just say we won because of a gale force wind that came outta nowhere to give us the win. Does that story make you happier? The gale force wind helped for sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deiter Fan Posted Tuesday at 05:18 AM Report Share Posted Tuesday at 05:18 AM (edited) 10 hours ago, JCon said: The drama could not have been better scripted If it was a dramatization...and you scripted it that way...people would call it hokey/fantasy nonsense Edited Tuesday at 05:20 AM by Deiter Fan Tracker 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnzo Posted Tuesday at 07:11 AM Report Share Posted Tuesday at 07:11 AM 12 hours ago, Super Duper Negatron said: If someone put that in a movie script it would have been rejected immediately as "too much". yup. truth is stranger than fiction because fiction usually has to make sense. Tracker 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bearpants Posted Tuesday at 08:16 PM Report Share Posted Tuesday at 08:16 PM On 2024-10-28 at 1:47 PM, JCon said: Going back to the end of the game and the wind storm, I found everything just played out perfectly, with Forde bringing up this crazy wind that was all-of-sudden pushing into the stadium, with the leaves following for the visual effect, a slight build-up in anticipation before the punt, and then the pooch. The drama could not have been better scripted. both TSN and CJOB really nailed the call on that last play... I was listening at the time since I wasn't near a TV. K-Shack, Noeller, JCon and 1 other 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DTonOB Posted 4 hours ago Report Share Posted 4 hours ago On 2024-10-26 at 10:03 PM, Booch said: based on roster...we should never see any until Lawson returns @DTonOB do you know or can yu find out how many starting nationals we declare on each side of the ball for a game... Here's what I have for this season for proper Canadians (O-D and total) 1: 6-4 T:10 2: 6-3 T:9 3: 6-3 T:9 4: 7-3 T:10 5: 7-3 T:10 6: 7-4 T:11 7: 7-3 T:10 8: 7-3 T:10 9: 5-3 T:8 10: 5-3 T:8 11: 5-4 T:9 12: 6-3 T:9 13: 6-4 T:10 14: 6-3 T:9 15: 6-3 T:9 16: 6-3 T:9 17: 6-3 T:9 18: 6-3 T:9 rebusrankin, JCon and HardCoreBlue 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Booch Posted 3 hours ago Report Share Posted 3 hours ago 37 minutes ago, DTonOB said: Here's what I have for this season for proper Canadians (O-D and total) 1: 6-4 T:10 2: 6-3 T:9 3: 6-3 T:9 4: 7-3 T:10 5: 7-3 T:10 6: 7-4 T:11 7: 7-3 T:10 8: 7-3 T:10 9: 5-3 T:8 10: 5-3 T:8 11: 5-4 T:9 12: 6-3 T:9 13: 6-4 T:10 14: 6-3 T:9 15: 6-3 T:9 16: 6-3 T:9 17: 6-3 T:9 18: 6-3 T:9 nice.....do you now tho what we had to have on each side of ball tho for the designation...like 6 on offence always...and only 1 on defence.....or 5...2..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now