Noeller Posted October 27 Report Posted October 27 I feel like you guys are really overrating Montreal and Toronto...
Tracker Posted October 27 Report Posted October 27 14 hours ago, wbbfan said: Yup. Honestly with Hubert next year and Samson. The only point to bring back schmek is to convert him to offence. Thomas shouldn’t play again. I like Adam’s a lot but he struggled in his snaps at 0 in the 30. He’s much better at 3i, or really any other dl tech. They’ve been using him more as an end this year than a nose and that’s a tough transition to just switch. Truth be told, we have not had even one dominant d-lineman this season, and, sadly, that includes Jefferson. No one on the D-line should be safe in the off-season. rebusrankin, Bubba Zanetti, wbbfan and 3 others 2 4
17to85 Posted October 27 Report Posted October 27 Just now, Noeller said: I feel like you guys are really overrating Montreal and Toronto... Both teams have better than solid defenses rebusrankin, Bigblue204, BigBlueFanatic and 4 others 5 2
GCn20 Posted October 27 Report Posted October 27 Just now, Bigblue204 said: Yes it had been a problem for a while now. Against good trams, they have a hard time putting up 7 All teams have the same problem vs Montreal hence their record this year. It's what Montreal does very well. 1 minute ago, Noeller said: I feel like you guys are really overrating Montreal and Toronto... How so? Montreal's record over the past season and a half speaks for itself, as does Toronto's with the sex offender under centre. BigBlueFanatic 1
blue85gold Posted October 27 Report Posted October 27 19 minutes ago, Bigblue204 said: They moved the ball day long. The problem isn't moving the ball, it's scoring tds. I mean really if Kenny catches that one early (which he usually does) and Sergio makes that early field goal that’s 7 more points. Agree too many point left out there but they showed a few weeks ago what happens when they are clicking. O is moving the ball and if they can get in the endzone in the playoffs look out
GCn20 Posted October 27 Report Posted October 27 2 minutes ago, 17to85 said: Both teams have better than solid defenses Both Montreal and Toronto have very good teams and depth. Rod Black, Zach Schnitzer, rebusrankin and 1 other 3 1
Tracker Posted October 27 Report Posted October 27 3 hours ago, ddanger said: That was a solid play from the Aussie. One of the damned few. He has hobbled us time and again. A couple of good plays do not offset that.
GCn20 Posted October 27 Report Posted October 27 5 minutes ago, Tracker said: Truth be told, we have not had even one dominant d-lineman this season, and, sadly, that includes Jefferson. No one on the D-line should be safe in the off-season. Tough to demonstrate dominance in a 30 front. Zach Schnitzer, Blue-urns and BomberBall. 3
Tracker Posted October 27 Report Posted October 27 1 hour ago, blue85gold said: The 61 yarder was short and wide so he would have had to let it bounce to get it into the endzone. Could have bounced any direction so would have been a risk A professional gambler once told me that "you can't beat dumb luck, but you can't make a living with it". Zach Schnitzer and rebusrankin 2
blue85gold Posted October 27 Report Posted October 27 10 minutes ago, Noeller said: I feel like you guys are really overrating Montreal and Toronto... Odds of one of them playing in the cup have to be 95%+ If they aren’t on the list of good teams who is? Blue-urns, rebusrankin, Super Duper Negatron and 1 other 2 2
Super Duper Negatron Posted October 27 Report Posted October 27 23 minutes ago, Noeller said: I feel like you guys are really overrating Montreal and Toronto... Compared to who? Blue-urns 1
Booch Posted October 27 Report Posted October 27 23 minutes ago, Bigblue204 said: Yes it had been a problem for a while now. Against good teams, they have a hard time putting up 7 Was typical cold weather fall..playoff football...yet we failed to.play that on offence with our bread and butter...and a lineup geared to ground and pound against 2nd worst run defence...I ask...why?? Blue-urns, Piggy 1 and Bigblue204 2 1
Goalie Posted October 27 Report Posted October 27 (edited) 1 hour ago, bustamente said: In the cold the Lions or Riders don't have a running attack that scares me, Bombers on the other hand................................... What cold? It’s gonna be like plus 10. 29 minutes ago, Tracker said: One of the damned few. He has hobbled us time and again. A couple of good plays do not offset that. Are you seriously ok? Despite yours and others talking points the bombers finished 1st in the west, won 8 in a row, probably 10 if our fg kicker makes all his attempts not including 61 yarder yesterday which I thought was stupid . and get a bye to the western final now. You talk about firing or resign and now this? Like maybe the bombers aren’t for you ya know. Maybe pull the rider jersey out the closet again. Tell me cuz I’m very curious, when won’t you complain? I’m curious. To the few you that’s all you really do. Nothing good enough ever. 1st place and a bye isn’t good enough? What the fugg is? You want them to do exactly like you would do? That’s not gonna happen. Accept it. they didn’t win right. They barely won. They didn’t do exactly what I would have done on PlayStation. Like honestly. Edited October 27 by Goalie blue85gold 1
rebusrankin Posted October 27 Report Posted October 27 Toronto and Montreal are arguably the top two teams in the CFL. bb1, wbbfan, Zach Schnitzer and 2 others 3 1 1
Goalie Posted October 27 Report Posted October 27 1 minute ago, rebusrankin said: Toronto and Montreal are arguably the top two teams in the CFL. I’d put them in the top 3. Not sure where exactly tho.
Mark H. Posted October 27 Report Posted October 27 42 minutes ago, Noeller said: I feel like you guys are really overrating Montreal and Toronto... Montreal, Toronto, Winnipeg - are the top 3 CFL teams - not necessarily in that order Had they stayed with Vaj, BC might be in the conversation Our D usually plays Vaj tough...so we'll see... Piggy 1, Rod Black, Noeller and 1 other 3 1
TBURGESS Posted October 27 Report Posted October 27 1 hour ago, Pete said: Maybe ,but the fact is, we were still in it with only 2 points difference. So lets not make it sound like we were outplayed. Total yards, 1st down TOP was all very close. Had we made the most of our red zone chances it wouldn't have been close The fact is that we didn't take advantage of our red zone chances. Our first FG was wide. Mtl should have given us the point and taken the 40 yard line. That would have eliminated our first FG. Our 61 yarder was short. Mtl should have given us the point and that would have eliminated our winning FG no matter what the wind did. Tracker 1
Rod Black Posted October 27 Report Posted October 27 2 minutes ago, Mark H. said: Montreal, Toronto, Winnipeg - are the top 3 CFL teams - not necessarily in that order Had they stayed with Vaj, BC might be in the conversation Our D usually plays Vaj tough...so we'll see... BC avec Vaj has been and can be formidable indeed.
White Out Posted October 27 Report Posted October 27 If we could solve our Red Zone problem I'll be way more confident that we could win two games in the playoffs Mark H. 1
blue85gold Posted October 27 Report Posted October 27 21 minutes ago, TBURGESS said: The fact is that we didn't take advantage of our red zone chances. Our first FG was wide. Mtl should have given us the point and taken the 40 yard line. That would have eliminated our first FG. Our 61 yarder was short. Mtl should have given us the point and that would have eliminated our winning FG no matter what the wind did. What is your point? There’s a thousand ifs and buts every game that would change things. So what? Rod Black and BigBlueFanatic 1 1
GCn20 Posted October 27 Report Posted October 27 (edited) 30 minutes ago, TBURGESS said: The fact is that we didn't take advantage of our red zone chances. Our first FG was wide. Mtl should have given us the point and taken the 40 yard line. That would have eliminated our first FG. Our 61 yarder was short. Mtl should have given us the point and that would have eliminated our winning FG no matter what the wind did. If my aunt had balls she'd be my uncle. You could literally take every football game decided by one score ever played and what if each team to a 10 point victory on 2-3 plays. Every what if you trot out a Bomber fan can do the same and argue we should have been up by 4-7 points. Edited October 27 by GCn20 BigBlueFanatic, Bigblue204 and rebusrankin 3
Mark H. Posted October 27 Report Posted October 27 29 minutes ago, TBURGESS said: The fact is that we didn't take advantage of our red zone chances. Our first FG was wide. Mtl should have given us the point and taken the 40 yard line. That would have eliminated our first FG. Our 61 yarder was short. Mtl should have given us the point and that would have eliminated our winning FG no matter what the wind did. Hmmm I wonder what the Argos' take on a single point...would be... Piggy 1 and Noeller 2
Noeller Posted October 27 Report Posted October 27 Trying to put a different spin on things: Is yesterday's finish the 2024 version of Collaros to Adams in the corner of the endzone? Zach Schnitzer 1
Mark H. Posted October 27 Report Posted October 27 37 minutes ago, Mark H. said: Montreal, Toronto, Winnipeg - are the top 3 CFL teams - not necessarily in that order Had they stayed with Vaj, BC might be in the conversation Our D usually plays Vaj tough...so we'll see... Just did some further reading: apparently the Argos' pass D has had issues in the 4th Q, of late. Say what you will about our D...but one thing they do well is clamp down in the second half. Piggy 1 and Noeller 2
Tracker Posted October 27 Report Posted October 27 15 minutes ago, blue85gold said: What is your point? There’s a thousand ifs and buts every game that would change things. So what? The point is that Maas made a couple of strategic errors that would have changed the game, but perhaps not the ultimate outcome.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now