GCn20 Posted Saturday at 07:57 PM Report Posted Saturday at 07:57 PM 3 minutes ago, SpeedFlex27 said: If we lost Buck I can say it's a safe bet that he won't come here. He'll follow Campbell to Edmonton. Why would he? We have an old & fading Collaros who seems to shut down in Grey Cups. Our most experienced backup in Streveler is currently injured & can't throw a pass over 5 yards with any accuracy. He could never flourish in a Maksymic offense. It looks like Bombers have no plans to bring in any of the free agent qbs that will be available in February. so it'll be status quo. Maksymic has Tre Ford in Edmonton if they sign him, MBT or Adams should they decide to sign him. Edmonton may be on the rise & we are getting old. Been hearing that for 3 years now. Noeller 1
SpeedFlex27 Posted Saturday at 07:58 PM Report Posted Saturday at 07:58 PM 1 minute ago, GCn20 said: This makes no sense. We have been the West division champions for those 3 straight years. There are 4 other teams that should be firing their coaches every year by your standard. You don't play for the chance to get to the Championship game. You play to win it. BIG difference. Just now, GCn20 said: Been hearing that for 3 years now. Well, good for you....
GCn20 Posted Saturday at 07:59 PM Report Posted Saturday at 07:59 PM 1 minute ago, SpeedFlex27 said: Based on the two stories I've read, Calgary (no surprise) is just a **** hole to play in. Calgary has an owner that too cheap to buy coffee and muffins for the players meetings. I can't see how they could grade any better than the inevitable F they are going to get. Bigblue204, Noeller and JohnnyAbonny 3
SpeedFlex27 Posted Saturday at 08:00 PM Report Posted Saturday at 08:00 PM 3 minutes ago, GCn20 said: Wouldn't want Maksymic as our OC. Might as well trade BO if we did that. Yeah, I know some wouldn't like it.
GCn20 Posted Saturday at 08:01 PM Report Posted Saturday at 08:01 PM Just now, SpeedFlex27 said: Yeah, I know some wouldn't like it. I don't like his offence at all. One dimensional and easy to shut down. Hope we aren't seriously considering him. Noeller and wbbfan 2
SpeedFlex27 Posted Saturday at 08:06 PM Report Posted Saturday at 08:06 PM (edited) 7 minutes ago, GCn20 said: Calgary has an owner that too cheap to buy coffee and muffins for the players meetings. I can't see how they could grade any better than the inevitable F they are going to get. The Stamps organizations have no facilities or equipment for their players. It's a damned embarassment for a city of 1.6 million. Why anyone would want to play here is beyond me. During training camp in May when smoke from forest fires were causing issues with safe air quality, the Stamps had no indoor facility to shift practice to. They had no choice but to cancel practices. Multi billionaire owner Edwards won't build an indoor practice facility for his team unless the City pays. Multi billionaire owner Murray Edwards could buy a tract of land & build a stadium if he wanted but City has to pay. He said no. Edited Saturday at 08:08 PM by SpeedFlex27 JohnnyAbonny 1
GCn20 Posted Saturday at 08:07 PM Report Posted Saturday at 08:07 PM Just now, SpeedFlex27 said: The Stamps organizations have no facilities or equipment for their players. It's a damned embarassment for a city of 1.6 million. Why anyone would want to come here is beyond me. During training camp when smoke from forest fires were causing issues with safe air quality, the Stamps had no indoor facility to shift practice to. They had no choice but to cancel practices. Multi billionaire owner Edwards won't build an indoor practice facility for his team unless the City pays. Multi billionaire owner Murray Edwards could buy a tract of land & build a stadium if he wanted. He said no. Yea...they used to be a FA destination because they were winning. Now they will only attract flies.
SpeedFlex27 Posted Saturday at 08:10 PM Report Posted Saturday at 08:10 PM 1 minute ago, GCn20 said: Yea...they used to be a FA destination because they were winning. Now they will only attract flies. I just shudder seeing 33,000 empty seats for every home game next season. They might as well just pull the plug on the team & let it die.
17to85 Posted Saturday at 08:13 PM Report Posted Saturday at 08:13 PM 5 minutes ago, SpeedFlex27 said: Multi billionaire owner Edwards won't build an indoor practice facility for his team unless the City pays. Multi billionaire owner Murray Edwards could buy a tract of land & build a stadium if he wanted but City has to pay. He said no. What are you a communist? Only profits are private, all risk and expenses should be socialized. I am still ******* angry at the sweetheart deal the governments out here gave the Flames. HardCoreBlue, wpgallday1960 and Noeller 3
Fatty Liver Posted Saturday at 08:20 PM Report Posted Saturday at 08:20 PM (edited) 23 hours ago, SpeedFlex27 said: The Stamps organizations have no facilities or equipment for their players. It's a damned embarassment for a city of 1.6 million. Why anyone would want to come here is beyond me. During training camp when smoke from forest fires were causing issues with safe air quality, the Stamps had no indoor facility to shift practice to. They had no choice but to cancel practices. Multi billionaire owner Edwards won't build an indoor practice facility for his team unless the City pays. Multi billionaire owner Murray Edwards could buy a tract of land & build a stadium if he wanted. He said no. The fact billionaires like Edwards and Tanenbaum are collecting revenue sharing payments from community owned teams to help support their teams should be embarrassing to these high risk captains of capitalism. Edited 15 hours ago by Fatty Liver HardCoreBlue, BigBlueFanatic and 17to85 3
SpeedFlex27 Posted Saturday at 08:28 PM Report Posted Saturday at 08:28 PM 10 minutes ago, 17to85 said: What are you a communist? Only profits are private, all risk and expenses should be socialized. I am still ******* angry at the sweetheart deal the governments out here gave the Flames. I said that Edwards has the money to build both facilities (practice & stadium) but wants the City to pay for it. As much as the Stamps need a new stadium, they need a practice facility even worse. Go take your meds. 17to85 1
wbbfan Posted Saturday at 08:28 PM Report Posted Saturday at 08:28 PM 55 minutes ago, Fatty Liver said: Interesting to see which way the Bombers would go if they lost Buck. @FarhanLaljiTSN #BCLions have asked for permission to interview #Riders OC Marc Mueller for their HC position. BC is casting a wide net. #Bombers have asked for permission to speak to Lions OC Jordan Maksymic for their OC position, in the event they lose Buck Pierce to a HC job. Cringe Super Duper Negatron and Noeller 2
SpeedFlex27 Posted Saturday at 08:30 PM Report Posted Saturday at 08:30 PM Just now, wbbfan said: Cringe Mueller has done nothing.
Fatty Liver Posted Saturday at 08:33 PM Report Posted Saturday at 08:33 PM 2 minutes ago, SpeedFlex27 said: Mueller has done nothing. Yah, strange Lions taking a wide scatter shot approach, thought Rigmaiden would bring them into focus, go out and get what they need.
Wanna-B-Fanboy Posted Saturday at 08:39 PM Report Posted Saturday at 08:39 PM (edited) 4 hours ago, Tracker said: Every coach reaches a best-before date and I think O'Shea has passed his. Edited Saturday at 08:42 PM by Wanna-B-Fanboy wbbfan, Goalie and Noeller 2 1
Goalie Posted Saturday at 08:58 PM Report Posted Saturday at 08:58 PM 18 minutes ago, Wanna-B-Fanboy said: Doesn’t he end up jumping lol. wbbfan and Wanna-B-Fanboy 2
SpeedFlex27 Posted Saturday at 09:24 PM Report Posted Saturday at 09:24 PM 49 minutes ago, Fatty Liver said: Yah, strange Lions taking a wide scatter shot approach, thought Rigmaiden would bring them into focus, go out and get what they need. If they hire Mueller, I'll not stop laughing for hours. Tracker and Booch 2
Mike Posted Saturday at 09:46 PM Report Posted Saturday at 09:46 PM I wouldn’t necessarily hate it. It’s a high powered offence and good coordinators use the pieces they have, they don’t try to fit round pegs into square holes. Piggy 1 1
Tracker Posted Saturday at 11:05 PM Report Posted Saturday at 11:05 PM 3 hours ago, GCn20 said: I don't like his offence at all. One dimensional and easy to shut down. Hope we aren't seriously considering him. If O'Shea is still here (a distinct probability) he will choose who fits his....ahem...unique personality.
JuranBoldenRules Posted Saturday at 11:22 PM Report Posted Saturday at 11:22 PM 20 hours ago, HardCoreBlue said: A bit frustrating to read your comment that our receivers didn’t know what to do in Zone D? Did they not expect it in preparing during the week? Jeebus. Talking in general over the course of the season not the Grey Cup game specifically. Collaros and several of the rookie receivers could not get on the same page or took half a season to. It's not an easy plug and play spot. Schoen is the exception not the rule. I think if we had 1-2 more guys around he trusted we wouldn't have seen the offense stalling out as much. Like Bailey might be a couple years past his prime but a guy like Wheatfall out there was worse than useless. Midseason we know Schoen isn't coming back and even that Wolitarsky is probably not going to be available much if it all the rest of the way....crazy they didn't pull the trigger on Bailey. HardCoreBlue 1
SpeedFlex27 Posted Saturday at 11:26 PM Report Posted Saturday at 11:26 PM 2 minutes ago, JuranBoldenRules said: Talking in general over the course of the season not the Grey Cup game specifically. Collaros and several of the rookie receivers could not get on the same page or took half a season to. It's not an easy plug and play spot. Schoen is the exception not the rule. I think if we had 1-2 more guys around he trusted we wouldn't have seen the offense stalling out as much. Like Bailey might be a couple years past his prime but a guy like Wheatfall out there was worse than useless. Midseason we know Schoen isn't coming back and even that Wolitarsky is probably not going to be available much if it all the rest of the way....crazy they didn't pull the trigger on Bailey. I got the impression that the Bomber braintrust was pretty stubborn in their ways, surprise, surprise (Walters & Osh). They would never admit they needed Bailey after they cut him even if they did.
Pete Posted Saturday at 11:31 PM Report Posted Saturday at 11:31 PM (edited) 6 minutes ago, SpeedFlex27 said: I got the impression that the Bomber braintrust was pretty stubborn in their ways, surprise, surprise (Walters & Osh). They would never admit they needed Bailey after they cut him even if they did. Bailey was cut from Toronto and couldn't make the active roster in Ottawa. Not having Bailey was not a factor Re signing exbombers hasnt been an issue ie Lofton and Taylor Edited Saturday at 11:33 PM by Pete
JuranBoldenRules Posted Saturday at 11:33 PM Report Posted Saturday at 11:33 PM Just now, Pete said: Bailey was cut from Toronto and couldnt make the active roster in Ottawa. Not having Bailey was not a factor Maybe, maybe not. Wheatfall was basically a void out there. Whitehead was busted up and can barely move. You have another reliable target that Collaros trusts. Maybe get 3-4-5-6 first down catches out of that guy. In our back to back with Sask Wolitarsky had 6 catches for first downs in those close games. Who took his place? Noeller 1
SpeedFlex27 Posted Saturday at 11:35 PM Report Posted Saturday at 11:35 PM Just now, Pete said: Bailey was cut from Toronto and couldnt make the active roster in Ottawa. Not having Bailey was not a factor Okay to keep struggling with a rookie like Josh Johnson or Wheatfall but an experienced Bailey wouldn't have been a factor? That makes no sense. He would have helped immensely. bailey was cut in a salary cap move where Dinwiddie felt a Canadian receiver who was cheaper & could play his position. he was the Argos ;eading receiver when he was let go.
Pete Posted Saturday at 11:35 PM Report Posted Saturday at 11:35 PM 1 minute ago, JuranBoldenRules said: Maybe, maybe not. Wheatfall was basically a void out there. Whitehead was busted up and can barely move. You have another reliable target that Collaros trusts. Maybe get 3-4-5-6 first down catches out of that guy. In our back to back with Sask Wolitarsky had 6 catches for first downs in those close games. Who took his place? thats more an indication of our practice roster than anything
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now