wbbfan Posted 10 hours ago Report Posted 10 hours ago 31 minutes ago, Goalie said: Of all the QBs, if you had to take a guy. All available. Who. For me, Sénécal. He can be molded into a rb/wr super sub who also does short yardage duty, and can run a package like streveler if you want. I don’t see near enough incentive to flip the qb ratio, and I don’t see the upside or polish in the rest of the QBs that is any thing you can’t easily find in imp rookie free agent QBs at all times. none cheat answer, if I had to take one qb as a qb it’d be elgersma. I think he has better mobility (especially after the acl for rourke) better size, and more arm talent. 5 minutes ago, Mike said: Tachinski as a converted receiver I like him as well as a project guy, especially since he’s been in our camp before and is extremely familiar with the organization. Noeller 1
Pete Posted 8 hours ago Report Posted 8 hours ago 7 hours ago, Noeller said: Anything other than OL/DL in the first couple picks seems like a waste. Then you go BPA. the first pick needs to be a potential starter within a year, if that's an ol great, but the first pick shouldn't be just a positional need , If a db pick is more likely to be that starter then we should go there. rebusrankin 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now