wbbfan Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago 1 hour ago, Mike said: Really good call by both of you, I like Nield Can we have both Nield and Bolo? I can't see demski holding up that much longer, having those two and big kev would put us in a fantastic spot with wr ratio. rebusrankin 1
Mike Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago 14 minutes ago, SpeedFlex27 said: I read on X today that the Ti Cats are pursuing Lawler "hard". Most of the best players are gone now to the Elks ( of course we won't ask how they can afford it with the salary cap). Will we lose him now? so tired of people complaining about the salary cap when they have no idea how it works we play this game literally every year “omg how can these 5? 6? teams do this does the salary cap not exist?” and then maybe 1 at most is over at the end of the season
SpeedFlex27 Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago Breaking News: The CFL has allotted a special "**** You" salary cap exemption to the new Edmonton Elks owner Larry Thompson of 15.5 million thereby thanking him for his taking over the disastrous franchise when nobody would. "We're just getting started. I might even buy a few star players under contract with other teams now. No one can stop me!!!" Said Ed Hervey excitedly as he grabbed a helmet & flung it through his office wall. rebusrankin 1
Mike Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago 1 minute ago, SpeedFlex27 said: Breaking News: The CFL has allotted a special "**** You" salary cap exemption to the new Edmonton Elks owner Larry Thompson of 15.5 million thereby thanking him for his taking over the disastrous franchise when nobody would. "We're just getting started. I might even buy a few star players under contract with other teams now. No one can stop me!!!" Said Ed Hervey excitedly as he grabbed a helmet & flung it through his office wall. see what I mean M.O.A.B., Bigblue204 and Noeller 1 2
SpeedFlex27 Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago 2 minutes ago, Mike said: so tired of people complaining about the salary cap when they have no idea how it works we play this game literally every year “omg how can these 5? 6? teams do this does the salary cap not exist?” and then maybe 1 at most is over at the end of the season Well, explain it then instead of complaining. Tell us how the Elks can continue to sign players in free agency with a salary cap of $5.9 million? if you can explain it, then I'm all ears. Or in this case, eyes as you're posting an answer. The more Hervey spends, the more they have to subtract at some point later. 1 minute ago, Mike said: see what I mean Like I said, explain it. rebusrankin 1
rebusrankin Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago 47 minutes ago, Tracker said: So why can't someone, ANYONE outbid the Bombers for Fatboi? Please? Osh will never let that happen. If Fatboi had military experience he'd be lining up for us at age 75 Bigblue204 and HardCoreBlue 2
Goalie Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago (edited) 7 minutes ago, SpeedFlex27 said: Well, explain it then instead of complaining. Tell us how the Elks can continue to sign players in free agency with a salary cap of $5.9 million? if you can explain it, then I'm all ears. Or in this case, eyes as you're posting an answer. The more Hervey spends, the more they have to subtract at some point later. Like I said, explain it. They have 2 QBs making what our 1 is. They also had less “impact” players than the bombers. They been a **** show. It makes sense they would throw money around cuz the 2 guys making the most last year MBT and Lewis ain’t around this year. It sounds like they overpaying guys a bit but they can cuz their roster was cheap after Lewis and MBT really. Edited 3 hours ago by Goalie Noeller 1
Fatty Liver Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago 9 minutes ago, rebusrankin said: Osh will never let that happen. If Fatboi had military experience he'd be lining up for us at age 75 Rumour has it O'Shea's gone on a bender, he's run off to follow Great Big Sea tour the Maritimes. rebusrankin 1
Mike Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago 15 minutes ago, SpeedFlex27 said: Well, explain it then instead of complaining. Tell us how the Elks can continue to sign players in free agency with a salary cap of $5.9 million? if you can explain it, then I'm all ears. Or in this case, eyes as you're posting an answer. The more Hervey spends, the more they have to subtract at some point later. Like I said, explain it. What is there to explain? They are adding contracts they can afford to add. Noeller 1
Brandon Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago 15 minutes ago, SpeedFlex27 said: Well, explain it then instead of complaining. Tell us how the Elks can continue to sign players in free agency with a salary cap of $5.9 million? if you can explain it, then I'm all ears. Or in this case, eyes as you're posting an answer. The more Hervey spends, the more they have to subtract at some point later. Like I said, explain it. Mike is right, why do people every season seemingly are confused that certain teams can have more money to spend then others during the off season. It's almost like Edmonton is trying to rotate out their roster and bring in fresh faces and remove old faces and start anew. While a team like Winnipeg only has to fill in a smaller amount of holes so naturally they won't have as many signings. It still doesn't change the fact that Winnipeg still has the same amount of players signed and probably just as many high priced veterans who are making higher then minimum amount of salary.
17to85 Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago 22 minutes ago, SpeedFlex27 said: LIke I said, explain it. The elks were a **** team with **** players. They're dumping their trash and trying to build their team through free agency. Noeller, SaidinBlue, Goalie and 1 other 3 1
wbbfan Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago 35 minutes ago, Mike said: so tired of people complaining about the salary cap when they have no idea how it works we play this game literally every year “omg how can these 5? 6? teams do this does the salary cap not exist?” and then maybe 1 at most is over at the end of the season I think it’s a bit worse this year because of all the sorta un capped media money, and the bc lions still not having been punished for last year. As always, the teams with the fewest players hold over add the most. losing all star players and adding guys well below that tier is a bitter pill to swallow as well. Though I don’t think it’s a bad approach at all if we can get multiple pieces to fill out multiple gaps. I’ll be happy if we add a few more solid starters and depth guys at our positions of greatest need. rebusrankin 1
Mike Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago 1 minute ago, wbbfan said: I think it’s a bit worse this year because of all the sorta un capped media money, and the bc lions still not having been punished for last year. As always, the teams with the fewest players hold over add the most. losing all star players and adding guys well below that tier is a bitter pill to swallow as well. Though I don’t think it’s a bad approach at all if we can get multiple pieces to fill out multiple gaps. I’ll be happy if we add a few more solid starters and depth guys at our positions of greatest need. Yeah, losing Lawler definitely hurts if that ends up being the case. That being said, we haven’t won the Grey Cup with him the last two years either so I’m willing to try something different. it can go one of many ways, but with our front office shake up, I’m hoping maybe we can see some talent brought in for position groups we’ve struggled with for the past couple seasons (edge rusher, linebacker) … they’ve got the pedigree for it, that’s for sure Noeller, Arnold_Palmer, wbbfan and 1 other 4
wbbfan Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago 32 minutes ago, Mike said: Yeah, losing Lawler definitely hurts if that ends up being the case. That being said, we haven’t won the Grey Cup with him the last two years either so I’m willing to try something different. it can go one of many ways, but with our front office shake up, I’m hoping maybe we can see some talent brought in for position groups we’ve struggled with for the past couple seasons (edge rusher, linebacker) … they’ve got the pedigree for it, that’s for sure Yeah if we get one of the next 2-3 guys I’m good with that. Some change finally might do us good. We could certainly use more of a diverse skill set from our WRs.
Booch Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago 1 hour ago, Mike said: Yeah, losing Lawler definitely hurts if that ends up being the case. That being said, we haven’t won the Grey Cup with him the last two years either so I’m willing to try something different. it can go one of many ways, but with our front office shake up, I’m hoping maybe we can see some talent brought in for position groups we’ve struggled with for the past couple seasons (edge rusher, linebacker) … they’ve got the pedigree for it, that’s for sure We not winning the cup last few yrs had nothing to do with the players...tho the injured ones we tried to play with didn't help...or the lack of depth in key spots...but that all points to the reason we lost. Noeller and wbbfan 1 1
Arnold_Palmer Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago 25 minutes ago, Noeller said: Not that surprised. I kind of saw the writing on the wall with the signing of Mitchell and then signing Schoen Even at a pay cut we’re spending a lot of money on our receiving core. We’ll probably bring in a second tier reciever and hope we can bring in the next Schoen or Wilson In training camp. rebusrankin, Noeller and wbbfan 3
wbbfan Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago Sucks to see lawler go, leaving a second time for cash after the dui injuries etc, don’t really want him back again. I kind of hope we go with a low risk high reward vet on a real good deal, and bring in a bunch of blue chip prospects at wr. Spend more money on the lines. Mark H., rebusrankin and BBlink 3
Bomber_fanaddict Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago 2 hours ago, SpeedFlex27 said: Well, explain it then instead of complaining. Tell us how the Elks can continue to sign players in free agency with a salary cap of $5.9 million? if you can explain it, then I'm all ears. Or in this case, eyes as you're posting an answer. The more Hervey spends, the more they have to subtract at some point later. Like I said, explain it. Have to remember the cap doesn’t count until the end of the season. A lot can happen between now and opening day and then during the season players can be released or 6-gamed. So teams can spend whatever they want right now and take all year to make it work out in the end. bigg jay 1
do or die Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago 6 hours ago, Booch said: Id say a legit MLB....NOSE/DT and DE are pretty huge holes here They were last year...... Trust the holes will get filled, this time..... Piggy 1 1
SpeedFlex27 Posted 23 minutes ago Report Posted 23 minutes ago 1 hour ago, Bomber_fanaddict said: Have to remember the cap doesn’t count until the end of the season. A lot can happen between now and opening day and then during the season players can be released or 6-gamed. So teams can spend whatever they want right now and take all year to make it work out in the end. Thank you but I already knew that however I appreciate your explanation. My cynicism comes from the fact that reports from TSN reporters like Farhan Lalji & Dave Naylor as well as social media stories all said that last season the BC LIons were considerably over the cap to the point that they may lose a draft pick. That would be in the neighbourhood of $100,000 or more. Vancouver was hosting the Grey Cup last season & Lions owner Amar Doman's team was hell bent on getting his team into the game to ensure a sell out. He didn't care financially how much he was over when it came to the salary cap. Teams don't care about losing a draft pick anymore. Why should they when they can poach a bunch of players to make up for it in free agency? It seems that this type of thing is going on more & more so as a fan it's hard for me to trust that other teams aren't doing it as well.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now