Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 minutes ago, BomberBall. said:

Up 2-0 heading to St. Louis feels pretty good.  Outside of the 2 3rd periods, the Jets haven’t played their best…. Really, it’s been a bit sloppy.  Good teams find ways to win.  If they find their groove, we should get a more comfortable win.

This is playoff hockey. The ice gets small, the forechecking and physicality ramps up. St. Louis plays that type of style so I never expected anything different. Our ability to roll 4 effective lines has worn them down in the last two games, and that is precisely how our team was built to win in the playoffs. I really see no cause for concern whatsoever. Next round we will either play Dallas, who plays a similar style, or Colorado that plays far more wide open. If it's Dallas just keep on keeping on, and if it's Colorado we will need to sharpen our pencils a bit.

2 minutes ago, kelownabomberfan said:

Not sure if anyone is watching the Avalanche series but both of those teams appear to be playing at an even faster speed and so the Jets better find their higher gear soon if they make it through to round 2.

They are playing at a higher pace because they are allowing each other to do so.

Posted (edited)
54 minutes ago, GCn20 said:

This is playoff hockey. The ice gets small, the forechecking and physicality ramps up. St. Louis plays that type of style so I never expected anything different. Our ability to roll 4 effective lines has worn them down in the last two games, and that is precisely how our team was built to win in the playoffs. I really see no cause for concern whatsoever. Next round we will either play Dallas, who plays a similar style, or Colorado that plays far more wide open. If it's Dallas just keep on keeping on, and if it's Colorado we will need to sharpen our pencils a bit.

They are playing at a higher pace because they are allowing each other to do so.

Never said I was concerned.  Just making observations on the series to this point, and what we could see going forward.

Edited by BomberBall.
Posted
1 hour ago, BomberBall. said:

Never said I was concerned.  Just making observations on the series to this point, and what we could see going forward.

Not suggesting you were concerned, just stating that your observations are our plan.

Posted
45 minutes ago, FrostyWinnipeg said:

 

I'm more fascinated by the person who thought it was a good idea to make a visitors bench to small where their back-up goaltender can't sit with them so he basically sits with the home team crowd plus have the visitors team locker-room where the visitors have to cross the ice to get there. Brilliant.

Posted
9 minutes ago, HardCoreBlue said:

I'm more fascinated by the person who thought it was a good idea to make a visitors bench to small where their back-up goaltender can't sit with them so he basically sits with the home team crowd plus have the visitors team locker-room where the visitors have to cross the ice to get there. Brilliant.

It was built for an AHL team in a location that was so small they had to close off a lane of Hargrave.

Posted
1 hour ago, HardCoreBlue said:

I'm more fascinated by the person who thought it was a good idea to make a visitors bench to small where their back-up goaltender can't sit with them so he basically sits with the home team crowd plus have the visitors team locker-room where the visitors have to cross the ice to get there. Brilliant.

I'm pretty sure they aren't the only arena with that setup, especially the visitor's locker room on the other side of the ice.

Posted
5 minutes ago, Sard said:

I'm pretty sure they aren't the only arena with that setup, especially the visitor's locker room on the other side of the ice.

For sure but just makes no sense to me from a convenience and safety perspective, especially the bench size where the visitor goaltender is sitting by himself in the crowd away from his team, weird. But that’s just me.

Posted
2 minutes ago, HardCoreBlue said:

For sure but just makes no sense to me from a convenience and safety perspective, especially the bench size where the visitor goaltender is sitting by himself in the crowd away from his team, weird. But that’s just me.

Is that the joker who was firing pucks down the ice at Scheif....Maybe he was showing his frustration for making him feel he wasn't part of the team...and had the 'blues'

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Stickem said:

Is that the joker who was firing pucks down the ice at Scheif....Maybe he was showing his frustration for making him feel he wasn't part of the team...and had the 'blues'

It wouldn't surprise me if they're buddies. Hofer is from Manitoba (clearly) and they're both devout Christians, from my understanding, so it wouldn't surprise me if they know each other well and were just ******* with each other...

Edited by Noeller
Posted (edited)
5 hours ago, Noeller said:

It wouldn't surprise me if they're buddies. Hofer is from Manitoba (clearly) and they're both devour Christians, from my understanding, so it wouldn't surprise me if they know each other well and were just ******* with each other...

They devour Christians?  That doesn’t seem very Christian.

Edited by BomberBall.
Posted (edited)
7 hours ago, FrostyWinnipeg said:

It was built for an AHL team in a location that was so small they had to close off a lane of Hargrave.

It was built for nhl in mind cuz moose barely drew 10k never mind 15 even in their canucks farm team glory days.  While I agree they should have got rid of Hargreave and the rink should be Donald to Carlton, I don’t think it adds as much space as you think. More seats and bigger concourse at best. 

Edited by Goalie

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...