voodoochylde Posted June 7, 2013 Report Posted June 7, 2013 Original Story Here Quick -- name the biggest free agent signing of the Joe Mack era. We kid. It's a trick question, of course, because the Winnipeg Blue Bombers GM regards free agent signings the same way Lindsay Lohan regards rehab clinics -- a place to go when there is positively no where else to go. But if you were going to make a list, you could make a case the biggest free agent coup of the Mack era isn't a player signing at all, but rather last winter's wrangling by Mack and head coach Tim Burke of Craig Dickenson as the Bombers new special-teams guru. And you don't have to take our word for it -- here's how Bombers boss Tim Burke described Dickenson on Thursday. "Watching him out there, he's so detailed, he's got it thought out so well. He's got a lot of experience in the CFL and the NFL. I think he just does a great job," said Burke. Continued at link...
MOBomberFan Posted June 7, 2013 Report Posted June 7, 2013 Original Story Here Buck Pierce was a FA when he signed with the Bombers, was he not? I'd say he was a pretty big FA signing.
voodoochylde Posted June 7, 2013 Author Report Posted June 7, 2013 Buck Pierce was a FA when he signed with the Bombers, was he not? I'd say he was a pretty big FA signing. Yeah .. but it's cheap and easy for writers in this town to take shots like that ..
James Posted June 7, 2013 Report Posted June 7, 2013 I'm lovin that we got Dickenson.... He looks super intense in that picture lol. I'd be intimidated if I was a player! I beleive with our Defence and run game, if we have a solid ST's unit(which we will) I think we will be a 10-12 win team. That's if our defence is 2011 caliber again.
MOBomberFan Posted June 7, 2013 Report Posted June 7, 2013 Not to mention some of the key non-signings he made. Greg Carr bolted, and Mack just went and replaced him with Matthews. I'd say we came out on top in that one.
Noeller Posted June 7, 2013 Report Posted June 7, 2013 Our media, outside Tait and Irving, suck balls. Eff those guys and their constant negativity. Bender was going on about the excess RBs and how the Bombers are never able to getting anything in return via trade, only losing them for free by cutting them. Gord Barnsley was getting into it with him about how ridiculous that statement is, in the CFL...where trades rarely happen, especially for import RBs.
Mike Posted June 7, 2013 Report Posted June 7, 2013 Our media, outside Tait and Irving, suck balls. Eff those guys and their constant negativity. Bender was going on about the excess RBs and how the Bombers are never able to getting anything in return via trade, only losing them for free by cutting them. Gord Barnsley was getting into it with him about how ridiculous that statement is, in the CFL...where trades rarely happen, especially for import RBs. Not going to get into a media bashfest but I have to more or less agree. I still like Penton too, but I don't really agree with his opinion. Doesn't mean he's not a good reporter though. Take Bender, Wiecek (who, I have to admit, is getting better slowly), Friesen and Lawless and I honestly think you could replace them with knowledgable fans and the quality of the information being shared would go up.
TrueBlue Posted June 7, 2013 Report Posted June 7, 2013 The last paragraph in the article: The other new wrinkle this year is Dickenson not being a big fan of having a full-time player on offence or defence serving as the team's kick returner, which suggests DB Johnson's days of running-back kicks might be numbered. Anyone know who has the inside track into filling this position as of right now? I know Massey is a returner, but who else? McCree?
Mike Posted June 7, 2013 Report Posted June 7, 2013 The last paragraph in the article: Anyone know who has the inside track into filling this position as of right now? I know Massey is a returner, but who else? McCree? Demond Washington.
Dascow Posted June 7, 2013 Report Posted June 7, 2013 Demond Washington. That seems like the logical choice, as long as he can hold on to the ball. (Last year he had a few troubles with that.) I was able to catch the first day of rookie camp and on that day Trever Kenedy had a pretty good practice. He has some serious wheels on him. So, for the people who have been able to watch some practices and see him perform, does he have a shot? (As a return guy.)
TrueBlue Posted June 7, 2013 Report Posted June 7, 2013 Demond Washington. I was meaning more along the lines of any rookies, if any.
M.O.A.B. Posted June 7, 2013 Report Posted June 7, 2013 im ok with washington as the fulltime returner and DI on defense. but if washington winds the nickel spot then someone else (not a starter) need to fill the returner spot. do will ford do kick returns in college? i think he suit that position well since he is quite dangerous in open field and he still can come in in some offensive snaps. EDIT: found out he return kicks and these are his stats. http://stats.washingtonpost.com/cfb/players.asp?id=139785
Mike Posted June 7, 2013 Report Posted June 7, 2013 I was meaning more along the lines of any rookies, if any. Ohhh If there are any rookies, I'd be guessing it'd be Massey and Kennedy as the front runners. Markett maybe?
Atomic Posted June 7, 2013 Report Posted June 7, 2013 Even the fundamental premise of the article is flawed... if we are going to include coaches in the list of Joe Mack's biggest accomplishments as GM, I think you have to point to luring Tim Burke away from Montreal before you look at landing Craig Dickenson. Jpan85 and MOBomberFan 2
iso_55 Posted June 10, 2013 Report Posted June 10, 2013 That was Lapo luring Tim Burke & Burke luring Dickenson.
SPuDS Posted June 11, 2013 Report Posted June 11, 2013 That was Lapo luring Tim Burke & Burke luring Dickenson. Yea but Mack has to agree to both, no? Lapo could have told him he wanted Mike Kelly back and wouldn't have.. also, Macks the one who pitches the offer and lands em..So technically Mack's the fisherman to lapo/burkes lures..
iso_55 Posted June 11, 2013 Report Posted June 11, 2013 GMs usually let their coaches pick their assistants because they have to work with them. It also explains why former fired head coaches end up as assistants coaching teams that fired them before.
SPuDS Posted June 11, 2013 Report Posted June 11, 2013 GMs usually let their coaches pick their assistants because they have to work with them. It also explains why former fired head coaches end up as assistants coaching teams that fired them before. yea thats a good point too.. I imagine that the coaches do have almost final say in the matter when it comes to assistants.. though i thought it was macks call on OC lapo's last season here.. but that would be the exception not the norm.
Jacquie Posted June 11, 2013 Report Posted June 11, 2013 yea thats a good point too.. I imagine that the coaches do have almost final say in the matter when it comes to assistants.. though i thought it was macks call on OC lapo's last season here.. but that would be the exception not the norm. Lapo chose Crowton, not Mack. Mack apparently told him to hire an OC but not who to hire. According to Lapo, he ran into Crowton at a coaches conference and they started talking about the CFL and then Mack was brought in after Lapo and Crowton started talking about the opening for OC in Winnipeg.
SPuDS Posted June 11, 2013 Report Posted June 11, 2013 Lapo chose Crowton, not Mack. Mack apparently told him to hire an OC but not who to hire. According to Lapo, he ran into Crowton at a coaches conference and they started talking about the CFL and then Mack was brought in after Lapo and Crowton started talking about the opening for OC in Winnipeg. huh. well then, colour me corrected.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now