Jump to content

Collaros to wait for free agency?

Mr. Perfect

By Mr. Perfect
in Blue Bomber Discussion

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 139
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

sweep the leg
sweep the leg

I'd cheer for a cloned Hitler if he could win us a Grey Cup.

17to85
17to85

but it's a very good reason actually. GMs don't want to deal with players getting their panties in a twist if they weren't protected and I'd rather have the fans left in the dark than to start creatin

Blueandgold
Blueandgold

McManus is being looked at as Assistant GM, that's a ways down the totem pole to decide on the starting Quarterback. Besides, who would seriously prefer Brian Brohm or Masoli or any of the Ticat Quart

bluto Mentor

bluto

Posted
Posted

Wow.  As a passer he's pretty crude in the CFL, hard to believe any NFL teams are interested.

 

this was sorta my feeling... that dang baseball-style windup was directly responsible for 3 fumbles (may have been 4... can't remember with certainty) in his short tenure as our QB.

Atomic Experienced

Atomic

Posted
Posted

 

 

Does who will hire effect the QB we go after? Khari may prefer Drew Willy. McManus may prefer Masoli or Brohm.

Walters prefers Collaros that's all that matters at this point.

Wanna bet that's who he prefers?

 

 

Who do you think he prefers?

Logan007 Newbie

Logan007

Posted
Posted

 

 

Does who will hire effect the QB we go after? Khari may prefer Drew Willy. McManus may prefer Masoli or Brohm.

Walters prefers Collaros that's all that matters at this point.

Wanna bet that's who he prefers?

 

Coming from a guy that just LIKED his own post.   :rolleyes:

SPuDS Newbie

SPuDS

Posted
Posted

Does who will hire effect the QB we go after? Khari may prefer Drew Willy. McManus may prefer Masoli or Brohm.

Walters prefers Collaros that's all that matters at this point.
Wanna bet that's who he prefers?

Coming from a guy that just LIKED his own post. :rolleyes:

that is pretty weak.. yup.

anyway.. i got a funny feelin' we end up with Burris and maaaaaaaaaybe Collaros but more likely Burris with a Drew Willy or Nichols...

Turbo Malone Newbie

Turbo Malone

Posted
Posted

Does who will hire effect the QB we go after? Khari may prefer Drew Willy. McManus may prefer Masoli or Brohm.

Walters prefers Collaros that's all that matters at this point.
Wanna bet that's who he prefers?

Coming from a guy that just LIKED his own post. :rolleyes:

I didn't know what that button was. Oh well.

Turbo Malone Newbie

Turbo Malone

Posted
Posted

Does who will hire effect the QB we go after? Khari may prefer Drew Willy. McManus may prefer Masoli or Brohm.

Walters prefers Collaros that's all that matters at this point.
Wanna bet that's who he prefers?

Who do you think he prefers?

Burris. And it's not even close.

Mike Grand Master

Mike

Posted
Posted

 

 

 

 

Does who will hire effect the QB we go after? Khari may prefer Drew Willy. McManus may prefer Masoli or Brohm.

Walters prefers Collaros that's all that matters at this point.
Wanna bet that's who he prefers?

Who do you think he prefers?

Burris. And it's not even close.

 

 

Oh, it's close.

 

Besides, maybe it's just me but someone I can't get into the idea of our QB being a guy that's been sacked by our head coach.

Jacquie Newbie

Jacquie

Posted
Posted

 

Oh, it's close.

 

Besides, maybe it's just me but someone I can't get into the idea of our QB being a guy that's been sacked by our head coach.

 

 

Maybe he could use it for motivation purposes. "I've put you on the turf before and I'll do it again"  ;)

MOBomberFan Grand Master

MOBomberFan

Posted
Posted

Matt Nichols hasn't been brought up much. Is it universally agreed that he is too 'injury prone' to be considered starter material? If it came down to Burris +1 but Collaros/Willy were too expensive or otherwise spoken for, I imagine Nichols would come at a cheaper rate. Or at least have a different sort of structure to his contract due to his injury history. He sure can play from what we've seen.

 

I know the immediate reaction for most people is 'Nooooope, not again.' Somehow I can't figure out what separates a player from being unlucky, foolhardy, or full blown injury prone.

Logan007 Newbie

Logan007

Posted
Posted

Matt Nichols hasn't been brought up much. Is it universally agreed that he is too 'injury prone' to be considered starter material? If it came down to Burris +1 but Collaros/Willy were too expensive or otherwise spoken for, I imagine Nichols would come at a cheaper rate. Or at least have a different sort of structure to his contract due to his injury history. He sure can play from what we've seen.

 

I know the immediate reaction for most people is 'Nooooope, not again.' Somehow I can't figure out what separates a player from being unlucky, foolhardy, or full blown injury prone.

It's ok. We'll let you know.

;)

SPuDS Newbie

SPuDS

Posted
Posted

seriously? he just led his team to a greycup berth (yayaya so did buck) and no one is saying he is the fix or the saviour we all want BUT if we are unable to land the next superstar QB or if his learning curve is too streep outta the gate, having Burris wouldnt be a bad idea... starter for a season maaaaaaaaaaybe 2 wouldnt cause me to panic..

17to85 Grand Master

17to85

Posted
Posted

The number one reason to not want Burris here is because he's the douchiest ****** that ever douched. He's not a winner and he's a fair weather qb. Keep that ******* off my team please. It would be very hard to cheer for the Bombers with Burris as qb. 

Brandon Grand Master

Brandon

Posted
Posted

Burris isn't that bad of a qb ,   it's not luck that he can put up gigantic numbers.   

 

He is though a fair weather qb,  does crumble under pressure and he's old as dirt and not a long term solution.  

 

I think this club only should bring him in *if* they can't get a guy who has proven that he can have success in this league. 

 

Realistically if we can't get Collaros or Tate then really it would be best that we do bring in Burris to help ease the new regime in.   

 

Burris is light years better then Goltz or Hall at this point so  bringing him in would definitely be an upgrade. 

 

The odds of us having a winning record next season is way higher with Burris then it would be with  Hall,  Goltz, Willy or Nichols...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

×
×
  • Create New...