Guest Posted January 31, 2014 Report Posted January 31, 2014 And the aftermath after Mack was gone at the QB spot...... Boltus
Guest Posted January 31, 2014 Report Posted January 31, 2014 Ottawa's staff is truly impressive Not hard to put together a staff when nobody on it is in demand. I happy O'Shea at least attempted to land some guys and then had to settle. While not overly impressive, Ottawa still has a pretty decent staff, some of whom would have been more than welcomed here. If you were talking Edmonton, then yeah.............
SPuDS Posted January 31, 2014 Report Posted January 31, 2014 And the aftermath after Mack was gone at the QB spot......Boltus *shudder* i realllllly hope that experiment has run its course.. Im nervous that with marcel back.... It hasnt.
Brandon Posted January 31, 2014 Report Posted January 31, 2014 And the aftermath after Mack was gone at the QB spot......Boltus *shudder* i realllllly hope that experiment has run its course.. Im nervous that with marcel back.... It hasnt. It really would be nice to know WHO decided and why they gave Boltus play time while Goltz sat on the bench..... I'd feel at least slightly relieved if it was revealed that Burke insisted on playing him rather then MB.... Logan007 and Mr Dee 2
JuranBoldenRules Posted January 31, 2014 Report Posted January 31, 2014 Ottawa's staff is truly impressive Not hard to put together a staff when nobody on it is in demand. I happy O'Shea at least attempted to land some guys and then had to settle. While not overly impressive, Ottawa still has a pretty decent staff, some of whom would have been more than welcomed here. If you were talking Edmonton, then yeah............. I'd love Mike Gibson as a OL coach. Other than that, pretty average to meh and inexperienced.
Guest Posted January 31, 2014 Report Posted January 31, 2014 And the aftermath after Mack was gone at the QB spot......Boltus *shudder* i realllllly hope that experiment has run its course.. Im nervous that with marcel back.... It hasnt. It really would be nice to know WHO decided and why they gave Boltus play time while Goltz sat on the bench..... I'd feel at least slightly relieved if it was revealed that Burke insisted on playing him rather then MB.... Let's not pretend that Goltz played well at all, or that he even deserved another shot. Aside from Boltus being horrendous, there was no other logical reason for Goltz to ever see the field again.
iso_55 Posted January 31, 2014 Report Posted January 31, 2014 yeah Iso give O'Shea a break man. I like that he's working on several different options, rather than just looking at a list and saying "he'll do" and moving on. He's also a rookie HC so he's going to have a bit of a learning curve. I hope the O'Shea reign lasts a long time, but he will make some mistakes. Even Huff still makes mistakes....cough cough Ameet Pall...cough... Gack. Spit. Green flem.
Logan007 Posted January 31, 2014 Report Posted January 31, 2014 And the aftermath after Mack was gone at the QB spot......Boltus *shudder* i realllllly hope that experiment has run its course.. Im nervous that with marcel back.... It hasnt. It really would be nice to know WHO decided and why they gave Boltus play time while Goltz sat on the bench..... I'd feel at least slightly relieved if it was revealed that Burke insisted on playing him rather then MB.... Let's not pretend that Goltz played well at all, or that he even deserved another shot. Aside from Boltus being horrendous, there was no other logical reason for Goltz to ever see the field again. Yeah you're right. Goltz, being able to run the ball and actually make a few plays by throwing, was just as equally bad as Boltus, who couldn't even hold onto the ball after the snap. SPuDS 1
17to85 Posted January 31, 2014 Report Posted January 31, 2014 And the aftermath after Mack was gone at the QB spot......Boltus *shudder* i realllllly hope that experiment has run its course.. Im nervous that with marcel back.... It hasnt. It really would be nice to know WHO decided and why they gave Boltus play time while Goltz sat on the bench..... I'd feel at least slightly relieved if it was revealed that Burke insisted on playing him rather then MB.... Let's not pretend that Goltz played well at all, or that he even deserved another shot. Aside from Boltus being horrendous, there was no other logical reason for Goltz to ever see the field again. There was the most logical reason... he was better than Boltus, especially at short yardage/goal line situations. You don't bench a guy because he played poorly in some starts when the guy who is replacing him is worse than he is, that's just stupid.
Guest Posted January 31, 2014 Report Posted January 31, 2014 Yeah you're right. Goltz, being able to run the ball and actually make a few plays by throwing, was just as equally bad as Boltus, who couldn't even hold onto the ball after the snap. There was the most logical reason... he was better than Boltus, especially at short yardage/goal line situations. You don't bench a guy because he played poorly in some starts when the guy who is replacing him is worse than he is, that's just stupid. I understand and agree with both points, my point was pretty simple I would think, Goltz didn't deserve to see the field, he was atrocious out there, he could run.............. that's about it. Leaving Boltus out there was a stupid mistake though, especially in short yardage situations.
Logan007 Posted January 31, 2014 Report Posted January 31, 2014 Yeah you're right. Goltz, being able to run the ball and actually make a few plays by throwing, was just as equally bad as Boltus, who couldn't even hold onto the ball after the snap. There was the most logical reason... he was better than Boltus, especially at short yardage/goal line situations. You don't bench a guy because he played poorly in some starts when the guy who is replacing him is worse than he is, that's just stupid. I understand and agree with both points, my point was pretty simple I would think, Goltz didn't deserve to see the field, he was atrocious out there, he could run.............. that's about it. Leaving Boltus out there was a stupid mistake though, especially in short yardage situations. Right, but our point was just that, we were stuck with both of them, Goltz should have been used. I still think he's the best short yardage guy out there right now. Should bring him in as a short yardage/RB and mix up what he does.
Guest Posted January 31, 2014 Report Posted January 31, 2014 Right, but our point was just that, we were stuck with both of them, Goltz should have been used. I still think he's the best short yardage guy out there right now. Should bring him in as a short yardage/RB and mix up what he does. I'd agree with short yardage, but that's about it. Anything more than one play every 2 and out is more than enough for Goltz.
SPuDS Posted February 1, 2014 Report Posted February 1, 2014 And the aftermath after Mack was gone at the QB spot......Boltus *shudder* i realllllly hope that experiment has run its course.. Im nervous that with marcel back.... It hasnt. Yay. Premonition was incorrect! *does happy dance*
DR. CFL Posted February 1, 2014 Report Posted February 1, 2014 Interesting how another thread gets twisted off topic. Now class stick to the topic.
Guest Posted March 3, 2014 Report Posted March 3, 2014 With Jonathan Himebauch brought in to be the Run Game coordinator and Offensive Line Coach, am I the only one wondering what Steve McAdoo actually does ? Steve McAdoo Offensive Coordinator Jonathan Himebauch Offensive Line/Run Game Coordinator Jarious Jackson Quarterbacks/Passing Game Coordinator/Player Development Kez McCorvey Receivers
Mike Posted March 3, 2014 Report Posted March 3, 2014 I'm 110% sure he understands McAdoo is the OC. What he is asking is if there is an offensive line coach, a receivers coach, a passing game coordinator and a run game coordinator, what exactly does the OC role entail.
Guest Posted March 4, 2014 Report Posted March 4, 2014 What he is asking is if there is an offensive line coach, a receivers coach, a passing game coordinator and a run game coordinator, what exactly does the OC role entail. Yup, this is my question, everything seems to be taking care of, so what exactly will McAdoo be doing ?
Jacquie Posted March 4, 2014 Report Posted March 4, 2014 I would think he would be doing what every other OC does.
gbill2004 Posted March 4, 2014 Report Posted March 4, 2014 I would think he would be doing what every other OC does. Exactly. I don't understand the question. All teams have position specific coaches. It's like asking what Mike O'Shea does because he has an OC, DC and ST coordinator.
Floyd Posted March 4, 2014 Report Posted March 4, 2014 I believe he will be 'coordinating' these guys.
Guest Posted March 4, 2014 Report Posted March 4, 2014 I believe he will be 'coordinating' these guys. Finally a decent answer. The reason I asked, was because if Himebach is coorindating the run game and Jackson the passing game, does that mean McAdoo is calling the plays and dictating the offensive game plan or is he going to be the hands off type essentially "overseeing" the offense.
Floyd Posted March 4, 2014 Report Posted March 4, 2014 I believe he will be 'coordinating' these guys. Finally a decent answer. The reason I asked, was because if Himebach is coorindating the run game and Jackson the passing game, does that mean McAdoo is calling the plays and dictating the offensive game plan or is he going to be the hands off type essentially "overseeing" the offense. McAdoo is a total rookie OC... you would think he will lean on these guys a fair bit. I think its a smart move by Jones to try and load up the offensive side of things - then he can just focus on defence. We'll see how it works.
DR. CFL Posted March 4, 2014 Report Posted March 4, 2014 Maybe Winnipeg better get a quality o line coach.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now