TrueBlue Posted June 25, 2013 Report Posted June 25, 2013 With Kashama though, what was the problem with him? There was a glaring reason as to why he wasn't re-signed this spring.
Valderan_CA Posted June 25, 2013 Report Posted June 25, 2013 There must have been something that people ACROSS THE LEAGUE didn't like about Kashama Nobody touched him in Free Agency, that says something about how he was viewed (unless he was being obstinate about his price)
Atomic Posted June 25, 2013 Author Report Posted June 25, 2013 All we ever heard about Kashama is that the WBB management didn't agree with him/his agent on his pricetag... maybe Kashama's camp was being stubborn on the price and the Bombers are still willing to talk if he lowers it? I don't know, it's all speculation.
Jpan85 Posted June 25, 2013 Report Posted June 25, 2013 I think the roster is still at 45 with room for one more Canadian I don't think they want to play Kowalczuk as a 7th o-linemen looking for a LB or DL to play on special teams right away.
M.O.A.B. Posted June 25, 2013 Report Posted June 25, 2013 most likely the NI LB or DL will go straight to the 42 so im inclined to believe that the guy will be plucked away from other team's roster
DR. CFL Posted June 25, 2013 Report Posted June 25, 2013 One position that can get u torched is SAM. We proved that last year. Once he gets found out as inadequate it is easy to isolate on him. He can run but he can't hide. It's impossible to hide him in a scheme.
Atomic Posted June 25, 2013 Author Report Posted June 25, 2013 One position that can get u torched is SAM. We proved that last year. Once he gets found out as inadequate it is easy to isolate on him. He can run but he can't hide. It's impossible to hide him in a scheme. Then I guess we'll find out real soon if our guys are ready or not
JuranBoldenRules Posted June 25, 2013 Report Posted June 25, 2013 One position that can get u torched is SAM. We proved that last year. Once he gets found out as inadequate it is easy to isolate on him. He can run but he can't hide. It's impossible to hide him in a scheme. Plus the SAM needs to make a lot of reads. Having a guy in his first CFL game there against the all-time passing leader doesn't inspire confidence. Hopefully we can get pressure.
17to85 Posted June 25, 2013 Report Posted June 25, 2013 One position that can get u torched is SAM. We proved that last year. Once he gets found out as inadequate it is easy to isolate on him. He can run but he can't hide. It's impossible to hide him in a scheme. however last year guys were getting burned all over the field so I think it's unfair to single out the one position.
Atomic Posted June 25, 2013 Author Report Posted June 25, 2013 however last year guys were getting burned all over the field so I think it's unfair to single out the one position. Also true. Having Labbe and Dustin Doe in at linebacker was not helping.
Valderan_CA Posted June 25, 2013 Report Posted June 25, 2013 Also true. Having Labbe and Dustin Doe in at linebacker was not helping. As long as Parker & MuambaX2 have good games our SAM won't be as important
TrueBlue Posted June 25, 2013 Report Posted June 25, 2013 As long as Parker & MuambaX2 have good games our SAM won't be as important Sure it will. There's only so much that Muamba and Parker can do to make up for the weakness on that side of the play. If the SAM misses his tackle, Parker or Muamba aren't going to be the ones to save it from being a big gain.
voodoochylde Posted June 25, 2013 Report Posted June 25, 2013 It's going to be really simple: we get pressure on the quarterback .. we're going to be successful .. if not .. this defense gets exposed.
17to85 Posted June 25, 2013 Report Posted June 25, 2013 Also true. Having Labbe and Dustin Doe in at linebacker was not helping. but Johnson was getting burned, the safety was getting burned, Hefney was getting burned. Just a lot of guys did not play well on defense last year. It took a while for the d-line to really shape up, Hall especially took a few games to figure the CFL out so the pressure wasn't as good as it could have been, took a while to settle in at the T spot. I'd expect a much better start from the entire defense this year just based on things being relatively settled and continuous on the defensive line, ideally the secondary plays better than they did last year, linebackers should be less of an issue if those areas do better and I do think Parker can do the job at one spot, and Muamba came along quite well as last year went along.
pigseye Posted June 26, 2013 Report Posted June 26, 2013 Antwi or Lopez would be useful here. We are lacking special teamers. Like Tristan Black, lol, just pulling your chain.
rebusrankin Posted June 26, 2013 Report Posted June 26, 2013 Logan, Johnson, Hefney and Bowman all played poorly last year for big stretches. This year we're not starting off with Labbe and Doe at linebacker. No Tamoria at tackle. Greaves and Sorenson all have another year of experience on the OL. Renaud seems to have regained his mojo.Lots of positives if you compare the start of 2013 to the start of last year.
Jacquie Posted June 26, 2013 Report Posted June 26, 2013 Would they bring in an NI to be on the 46 until Jake Thomas can go and then move the new guy to the open NI spot on the PR?
Floyd Posted June 26, 2013 Report Posted June 26, 2013 While we're blaming 2012 on everyone, we really shouldn't forget Chip Garber. That was just a bad decision. MOBomberFan 1
M.O.A.B. Posted June 26, 2013 Report Posted June 26, 2013 Would they bring in an NI to be on the 46 until Jake Thomas can go and then move the new guy to the open NI spot on the PR? Im kinda hoping its Doug Brown. :-)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now