Mike Posted February 6, 2014 Report Posted February 6, 2014 Hall really isn't that bad, he definitely appeals to me as a backup. Mr. Perfect, Noeller, Blueandgold and 3 others 6
Brandon Posted February 6, 2014 Report Posted February 6, 2014 Hall and Willy battling for spots 1 and 2 wouldn't be the worst situation. It's much better then last year when they gave Buck the keys and then dumped it on Goltz when Buck was hurt. Noeller 1
Noeller Posted February 6, 2014 Report Posted February 6, 2014 Would rather it be Glenn and Willy, but Willy and Hall would be alright in my books.
Logan007 Posted February 6, 2014 Report Posted February 6, 2014 Would rather it be Glenn and Willy, but Willy and Hall would be alright in my books. Geez, plagiarize me why don't you.
TrueBlue Posted February 6, 2014 Report Posted February 6, 2014 If it were up to me giving a second round pick to a team for a QB, I'd be giving it to Ottawa for Glenn, not to Edmonton for Nichols. Nichols is just not worth a second round. It's moot anyways because we don't have a second round pick.
Logan007 Posted February 6, 2014 Report Posted February 6, 2014 If it were up to me giving a second round pick to a team for a QB, I'd be giving it to Ottawa for Glenn, not to Edmonton for Nichols. Nichols is just not worth a second round. It's moot anyways because we don't have a second round pick. I know, people have stated that enough times around here it's burned into my brain. My comment was more of a "if we're going to give something to someone for a QB, I'd rather have Glenn".
Atomic Posted February 6, 2014 Report Posted February 6, 2014 If it were up to me giving a second round pick to a team for a QB, I'd be giving it to Ottawa for Glenn, not to Edmonton for Nichols. Nichols is just not worth a second round. It's moot anyways because we don't have a second round pick. I know, people have stated that enough times around here it's burned into my brain. My comment was more of a "if we're going to give something to someone for a QB, I'd rather have Glenn". But we don't have our second rounder anymore
Logan007 Posted February 6, 2014 Report Posted February 6, 2014 If it were up to me giving a second round pick to a team for a QB, I'd be giving it to Ottawa for Glenn, not to Edmonton for Nichols. Nichols is just not worth a second round. It's moot anyways because we don't have a second round pick. I know, people have stated that enough times around here it's burned into my brain. My comment was more of a "if we're going to give something to someone for a QB, I'd rather have Glenn". But we don't have our second rounder anymore I hate you.
OldSchoolBlue Posted February 6, 2014 Report Posted February 6, 2014 Glenn and Willy please, Hall is NFG.
The Unknown Poster Posted February 6, 2014 Report Posted February 6, 2014 Drew Tate will be our starter Do you just pull information like this out of your butt? How do you even come to this conclusion? They just lost Glenn, why do you think they'd give us Tate? Just a hunch.
Mr. Perfect Posted February 6, 2014 Report Posted February 6, 2014 Hall really isn't that bad, he definitely appeals to me as a backup. This. Factor in that he'll be in an actual CFL offence right out of training camp is sure to help as well as both him and Marcel were really in no win situations last year. blitzmore and Noeller 2
Logan007 Posted February 6, 2014 Report Posted February 6, 2014 Drew Tate will be our starter Do you just pull information like this out of your butt? How do you even come to this conclusion? They just lost Glenn, why do you think they'd give us Tate? Just a hunch. Is this the same hunch where you said Khari was going to come here to be our next OC?
Noeller Posted February 6, 2014 Report Posted February 6, 2014 The way I figure, if they're going to offer up that 2nd overall for a QB, Tate is the only reasonably-available one that I could live with. Still seems like an awfully high price to pay tho...
Blueandgold Posted February 6, 2014 Report Posted February 6, 2014 The way I figure, if they're going to offer up that 2nd overall for a QB, Tate is the only reasonably-available one that I could live with. Still seems like an awfully high price to pay tho... Injury prone Tate? No thanks. I'd take Glenn 1000x over before I drank moonshine and considered Tate. Logan007 1
B-F-F-C Posted February 6, 2014 Report Posted February 6, 2014 Tate would be my guy as well but I don't think we would need to give up our 1st rounder. Quite frankly I wouldn't give up our #1 for anyone less than Ricky Ray or Travis Lulay. ;) ;) ;)
Logan007 Posted February 6, 2014 Report Posted February 6, 2014 Tate would be my guy as well. No spank you. No spank you very much. Glenn all the way.
Mr. Perfect Posted February 6, 2014 Report Posted February 6, 2014 Injury history aside (though obviously it is part of the equation when considering trades) Tate is much more of a ruthless and cerebral QB than Glenn. He'll have his foot on a team's throat and keep pressing down harder. His attitude rubs some people the wrong way. Personally, I love it when a QB is animated. You see it presently with Tom Brady, and you use to see it in the past with Dunigan all the time during his playing days. B-F-F-C 1
Logan007 Posted February 6, 2014 Report Posted February 6, 2014 Either way, I can't see Calgary releasing Tate yet. Not this year anyway.
Mr. Perfect Posted February 6, 2014 Report Posted February 6, 2014 Either way, I can't see Calgary releasing Tate yet. Not this year anyway. Agreed unfortunately. I'd love to have Drew Tate here, but Drew Willy is a nice consolation prize.
Zontar Posted February 6, 2014 Report Posted February 6, 2014 Serious. Seen lots of good, bad and ugly from Hall but if there was a game where NIchols demonstrated clear superiority I did not see that game. http://cfl.ca/video/index/id/80959 http://cfl.ca/video/index/id/81217 Would have been nice to find full games. because he plays for a different team. Bomber fans do this all the time. Everyone here is useless anyone who has shown any remote spark on another team is automatically better. By this logic we should just stick with Hall, Goltz and Brown for 2014 and see how that goes. Smoklng hot wife and mum would be a good reason to keep him around.
Mr Dee Posted February 6, 2014 Report Posted February 6, 2014 Drew Tate will be our starter Do you just pull information like this out of your butt? How do you even come to this conclusion? They just lost Glenn, why do you think they'd give us Tate? Just a hunch. Is this the same hunch where you said Khari was going to come here to be our next OC? Ask yourself... What does just a hunch rhyme with?
Tracker Posted February 6, 2014 Report Posted February 6, 2014 Okay, now that Willy is on board, if we can also sign Nichols, we ought to be in good shape. Let them and Hall fight it out for the starting position.
Guest Posted February 6, 2014 Report Posted February 6, 2014 Okay, now that Willy is on board, if we can also sign Nichols, we ought to be in good shape. Let them and Hall fight it out for the starting position. We'd have to trade for Nichols, as he just re-upped with Edmonton in December.
Logan007 Posted February 6, 2014 Report Posted February 6, 2014 Drew Tate will be our starter Do you just pull information like this out of your butt? How do you even come to this conclusion? They just lost Glenn, why do you think they'd give us Tate? Just a hunch. Is this the same hunch where you said Khari was going to come here to be our next OC? Ask yourself... What does just a hunch rhyme with? Lunch? I like lunch. Munch? Cause I like to munch on lunch. Crunch? Cause I can crunch when I munch on lunch. Bunch? Cause I can crunch on a bunch when I munch on lunch. ...ok I give up.
Mr Dee Posted February 6, 2014 Report Posted February 6, 2014 Drew Tate will be our starter Do you just pull information like this out of your butt? How do you even come to this conclusion? They just lost Glenn, why do you think they'd give us Tate? Just a hunch. Is this the same hunch where you said Khari was going to come here to be our next OC? Ask yourself... What does just a hunch rhyme with? Lunch? I like lunch. Munch? Cause I like to munch on lunch. Crunch? Cause I can crunch when I munch on lunch. Bunch? Cause I can crunch on a bunch when I munch on lunch. ...ok I give up. You were close…just a hunch….out to lunch
Recommended Posts