Jpan85 Posted July 5, 2013 Report Posted July 5, 2013 Yeah Pierce to Pierce! That would be awesome! Hank Burris is a lot like Glenn, you get to him early and hit him a few times, and he goes into his cry-baby mode and his game goes to pieces. If he gets into a rhythm though he's deadly. One of the best. I hope Edmonton somehow lays some hurt on him this week. Their offence is atrocious, but at least the defence should show something, I hope. We got a lot of speed on our d to match the quickness with the exception of Fantuz that Hamilton has.
kelownabomberfan Posted July 5, 2013 Report Posted July 5, 2013 We got a lot of speed on our d to match the quickness with the exception of Fantuz that Hamilton has. Yeah Hamilton's got crappy receivers. We should definitely double-team Giguere all night. And no Rod Black, that doesn't mean what you think it means.
Mark H. Posted July 5, 2013 Report Posted July 5, 2013 Yeah Pierce to Pierce! That would be awesome! Hank Burris is a lot like Glenn, you get to him early and hit him a few times, and he goes into his cry-baby mode and his game goes to pieces. If he gets into a rhythm though he's deadly. One of the best. I hope Edmonton somehow lays some hurt on him this week. Their offence is atrocious, but at least the defence should show something, I hope. Thing is though, neither Glenn nor Burris are easy to get to. Burris is well protected and he's still a decent scrambler.
kelownabomberfan Posted July 5, 2013 Report Posted July 5, 2013 Thing is though, neither Glenn nor Burris are easy to get to. Burris is well protected and he's still a decent scrambler. yeah that's true. We got to him last year though, Muamba made him cry with those forced fumbles and hits when he was scrambling. I still remember Muamba corking Burris a good one with a hard hit that he didn't like, and he got up in Muamba's face and you could tell he was crying about Muamba hitting him too hard. It's too bad Burris has that kind of personality, it's one of the reasons I can't stand him and don't want him on my team. I know he's got the tools to be a great one, but he's also a massive whiner who folds his tent and puts his toys away if he decides he doesn't want to play anymore.
johnzo Posted July 5, 2013 Report Posted July 5, 2013 Whatever Hank does, it works for him because he never gets hurt. Has he ever missed any significant stretches with an injury? I know he's got the tools to be a great one, but he's also a massive whiner who folds his tent and puts his toys away if he decides he doesn't want to play anymore. I've seen him go into Frank mode without anyone cranking him. Somedays he's his own worst enemy.
kelownabomberfan Posted July 5, 2013 Report Posted July 5, 2013 Whatever Hank does, it works for him because he never gets hurt. Has he ever missed any significant stretches with an injury? I've seen him go into Frank mode without anyone cranking him. Somedays he's his own worst enemy. I think he tore his ACL in 1999. At least that's what I read somewhere.
Noeller Posted July 5, 2013 Report Posted July 5, 2013 Is it bad that I'm actually happy about this? I really want to see some more of our young guys step in; it's incredible that in our first two games, our three leading receivers are all Canadian. Can't wait to see what Anderson and/or Pierce can do! I'm actually kind of excited to get either Pierce or Anderson in there... Blue-urns and O2L 2
Jacquie Posted July 6, 2013 Report Posted July 6, 2013 Saw a report earlier that Turner is out of the hospital and on his way back to Winnipeg. rebusrankin 1
Blue2013 Posted July 6, 2013 Report Posted July 6, 2013 Edwards didn't finish the game did he? haven't heard a word on him. Injured his shoulder, out at least a couple weeks.
Brandon Posted July 6, 2013 Report Posted July 6, 2013 Hank isn't made of glass and has a build, the problem with Tate is that he plays with reckless abandon and instead of taking a slide he'd rather go head first and take a big hit. Plus he moves around the pocket a lot more then most other qbs. Burris usually gets frazzled if you get in his face often and/or if if he has a few two and outs. He then forces his throws and that's when it's time to take advantage,
Jimmy Pop Posted July 7, 2013 Report Posted July 7, 2013 Is it bad that I'm actually happy about this? I really want to see some more of our young guys step in; it's incredible that in our first two games, our three leading rec.eivers are all Canadian. Can't wait to see what Anderson and/or Pierce can do! I wouldn't say I'm happy - never like to see one of our guys go down. But, this is a good test for the guys you've mentioned.
17to85 Posted July 7, 2013 Report Posted July 7, 2013 the problem with Tate is that he plays with reckless abandon and instead of taking a slide he'd rather go head first and take a big hit. he really is like a young Buck Pierce.
kelownabomberfan Posted July 8, 2013 Report Posted July 8, 2013 Bob Irving @BobIrvingCJOB17m Tim burke confirms bryant turner and terrence edwards will miss saturdays game in guelph--turner might only miss 1 week, edwards likely more
Fraser Posted July 8, 2013 Report Posted July 8, 2013 I guess we'll see how good Frazier is. At this point I wouldn't be opposed to bringing in Huntly off Calgary's PR.
Jpan85 Posted July 8, 2013 Report Posted July 8, 2013 I guess we'll see how good Frazier is. At this point I wouldn't be opposed to bringing in Huntly off Calgary's PR. or go with Thomas and Lucas for a game
Valderan_CA Posted July 8, 2013 Report Posted July 8, 2013 Maybe go with Both... rotating them frequently
Fraser Posted July 8, 2013 Report Posted July 8, 2013 or go with Thomas and Lucas for a game I would try this is we weren't so dependent on a dominate D performacne to win games.
Mike Posted July 8, 2013 Report Posted July 8, 2013 I'm starting to wonder if Frazier sits and Jake Thomas starts at DT.so that we can dress Aaron Woods.
JuranBoldenRules Posted July 8, 2013 Report Posted July 8, 2013 I'm starting to wonder if Frazier sits and Jake Thomas starts at DT.so that we can dress Aaron Woods. Which NI would come off for Lucas? Maybe Green, but we are really low on special teamers to cover kicks, and Thomas or Lucas can't really fill that role. Also have some doubt that they'd toss Woods in there right away. We have Washington who can do some punts, Denmark too is a bit less explosive but he'll catch the punt.
Atomic Posted July 8, 2013 Report Posted July 8, 2013 Which NI would come off for Lucas? Maybe Green, but we are really low on special teamers to cover kicks, and Thomas or Lucas can't really fill that role. Also have some doubt that they'd toss Woods in there right away. We have Washington who can do some punts, Denmark too is a bit less explosive but he'll catch the punt. Well we could conceivably take off Etienne or Kohlert as Woods would then be filling a backup receiver role. But I agree, probably won't shake down that way.
Valderan_CA Posted July 8, 2013 Report Posted July 8, 2013 Well we could conceivably take off Etienne or Kohlert as Woods would then be filling a backup receiver role. But I agree, probably won't shake down that way. He can't back either of those two up however.
Atomic Posted July 8, 2013 Report Posted July 8, 2013 He can't back either of those two up however. Ok so start him
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now