gbill2004 Posted March 19, 2014 Report Posted March 19, 2014 FAT = Fully automated timing has no human intervention. Intensive studies, mostly by track and field devotees, suggest that fully automated timing, or FAT, would add .20 to .24 seconds to the 40-yard times at the combine and throughout football.
Mike Posted March 20, 2014 Author Report Posted March 20, 2014 Kirk Penton reported in yesterday's paper that Queens LB Sam Sabourin, who was ranked 12th in the recent CSB rankings, will not turn pro and that's why he isn't attending the combine this weekend.
Floyd Posted March 20, 2014 Report Posted March 20, 2014 Dammit Sabourin was my Johnny Aprile this year... back to the drawing board.
Atomic Posted March 20, 2014 Report Posted March 20, 2014 Dammit Sabourin was my Johnny Aprile this year... back to the drawing board. What, a guy who will never play pro football? I'd say you nailed it, then. sweep the leg 1
Floyd Posted March 21, 2014 Report Posted March 21, 2014 Dammit Sabourin was my Johnny Aprile this year... back to the drawing board. What, a guy who will never play pro football? I'd say you nailed it, then. Oh you smarty pants.
mikey d Posted March 21, 2014 Report Posted March 21, 2014 Montreal Combine is finished ... Have to be honest, it's a pretty sad showing. One guy that really surprised me was Laval receiver Julian Bailey. This guy was considered a top 10 pick in this class a few years ago, but it turns out he hasn't qualified as a non-import yet. He still participated at the combine as an import today and ran a 5.12 40 yard. Expected better. At first glance, I didn't see many guys whose testing numbers would earn them an invite. Quinn Everett would be one, but to me, you'd have to earn an invite based on the interview if you were anybody else. I took a look this morning at the results for the regional combines... The Edmonton and Montreal combines had some terrible numbers for the 40 yd dash. Skill players in the 4.7 to 5.1 range. Seems the Toronto combine had some better results, maybe they timed the 40 differently. Publishing these "FAT" times sure isn't flattering any of the prospects. They should go back to hand-times.
iso_55 Posted March 21, 2014 Report Posted March 21, 2014 Dammit Sabourin was my Johnny Aprile this year... back to the drawing board. Shut up, Joe. Aren't you retired??? Floyd 1
Jaxon Posted March 21, 2014 Report Posted March 21, 2014 Publishing these "FAT" times sure isn't flattering any of the prospects. They should go back to hand-times. So you'd rather have inaccurate information to judge your talent on? Do you think that they should add 20 lbs and 3" in height to player's information in the roster to make them more flattering too? IMHO, they should put the most accurate information possible.
iso_55 Posted March 21, 2014 Report Posted March 21, 2014 They run the same whether timed electronically or by hand. They don't slow down if timed electronically or speed up if timed by hand. The change in times will be taken into consideration. You're either fat or you're not.
Jacquie Posted March 21, 2014 Report Posted March 21, 2014 You're either fat or you're not. You would know.
mikey d Posted March 21, 2014 Report Posted March 21, 2014 Publishing these "FAT" times sure isn't flattering any of the prospects. They should go back to hand-times. So you'd rather have inaccurate information to judge your talent on? Do you think that they should add 20 lbs and 3" in height to player's information in the roster to make them more flattering too? IMHO, they should put the most accurate information possible. The automated times start at the first movement the runner makes, be it an arm, a head, etc. Watch some of the NFL combine stuff where they show two runners side by side on split screen, or overlapped. Often times the guy who actually ran faster will have the poorer automated time. iso_55 1
iso_55 Posted March 22, 2014 Report Posted March 22, 2014 You're either fat or you're not. You would know. Fast!! I meant fast.... LOL! Floyd 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now