IC Khari Posted April 29, 2014 Report Posted April 29, 2014 The more this Kevin Glenn thing goes on the more I'm wondering if getting him would be necessary for the Bombers. I think it's time to develop a QB and stick with him under a good system.
Tracker Posted April 29, 2014 Report Posted April 29, 2014 This is where the rubber hits the road. If the Bomber brain trust are doing their jobs properly, there ought to be a pretty clear picture soon about whether or not there's a winner in the current crop of wannabe quarterbacks. If, despite their best efforts, there is no confidence in this lot, then the Bombers may have to hold their collective noses and negotiate for Glenn.
IC Khari Posted April 29, 2014 Author Report Posted April 29, 2014 Thinking this choice is actually much more important for the long term health of the franchise than we all can even imagine. I would think the time for talking about getting/developing a franchise QB is long overdue and getting one is past critical stage, let's hope the Bombers make the right choice ...
17to85 Posted April 29, 2014 Report Posted April 29, 2014 If Glenn is released or you can get him for a late round draft pick sure bring him in, if you have to pay a premium for him **** off. Yourface, Blue-urns and Goalie 3
Stickem Posted April 29, 2014 Report Posted April 29, 2014 When he's released he'll most likely want to stay in the east close to his business. Mont. would most likely be his first choice. I don't know where we rate in his future but I guess we'll find out down the road. I can't see any team offering much for him if Ottawa tries to trade him, and I have a feeling we won't be in the market at any rate. Definitely NO to Glenn.
The Unknown Poster Posted April 29, 2014 Report Posted April 29, 2014 I like Glenn. I'd like to see him go out on a high note. But we don't need him. Unless we do. But if we do, thats not something that has become clear yet.
OldSchoolBlue Posted April 29, 2014 Report Posted April 29, 2014 If you can get him cheap, why not? He's proven to be a valuable guy when your starter goes down.
Armchair GM Posted April 29, 2014 Report Posted April 29, 2014 Open to Glenn if he is released and can be picked up for only salary considerations. But if need to give up something to get him... no thanks. Hall is an adequate backup.
IC Khari Posted April 29, 2014 Author Report Posted April 29, 2014 uh oh... we're starting this again!?! It's a looooooooong off season brother ...
Mr Dee Posted April 29, 2014 Report Posted April 29, 2014 uh oh... we're starting this again!?! No, it's strictly a back up thread.
Mr. Perfect Posted April 29, 2014 Report Posted April 29, 2014 We'll be just fine without him. If he's cut and can be signed for a decent back-up price then kick the tires and see what happens but I think we'll be just fine with our current batch of pivots.
TBURGESS Posted April 29, 2014 Report Posted April 29, 2014 If the Bombers want Glenn, it would make sense to trade something for him, but not the #2 overall pick or any NI starters. If Glenn is released, he will have choices as to where he plays and Winnipeg won't be his top team. His contract will likely be more too.
DR. CFL Posted April 29, 2014 Report Posted April 29, 2014 Why would Ottawa give away Glenn? He is exactly the insurance policy any team wanting depth at the QB spot needs. His contract allows him to be a perfect back up in Ottawa or on any team. He only gets a good amount of money based on playtime. It has been proven that teams better not count on a QB playing 18 games in a season.
17to85 Posted April 29, 2014 Report Posted April 29, 2014 Why would Ottawa give away Glenn? He is exactly the insurance policy any team wanting depth at the QB spot needs. His contract allows him to be a perfect back up in Ottawa or on any team. He only gets a good amount of money based on playtime. It has been proven that teams better not count on a QB playing 18 games in a season. Because Glenn wants out and is unhappy being there feeling he was mistreated AND because Henry Burris is notorious for not liking someone behind him on the depth chart who can challenge him in any way shape or form. Stop posting your deliberately trollish nonsense and start speaking common sense.
DR. CFL Posted April 29, 2014 Report Posted April 29, 2014 I guess we will just have to see what transpires. Not sure why u feel compelled to label something trollish if you don't agree?
johnzo Posted April 29, 2014 Report Posted April 29, 2014 I bet that Glenn will be traded, not released.
Floyd Posted April 29, 2014 Report Posted April 29, 2014 Yeah, I don't see the sense in releasing Glenn... suspend him if you have to but maybe Burris gets hurt in TC or Game Two... ridiculous to dump him for nothing. I actually think if we still had our 2nd round pick, we would have offered it for Glenn straight up
17to85 Posted April 29, 2014 Report Posted April 29, 2014 I guess we will just have to see what transpires. Not sure why u feel compelled to label something trollish if you don't agree? Because people who consistently post as much nonsense as you do are either stupid or trolling and you're too coherent for me to think you're stupid.
Floyd Posted April 29, 2014 Report Posted April 29, 2014 Let's start a Joe Mack thread now and see if 17to85's head explodes. DR. CFL 1
Goalie Posted April 29, 2014 Report Posted April 29, 2014 went with the no option here, but agree with 17to85 first post. If we can get for a late round pick, do it. If not, nope.
Blueandgold Posted April 30, 2014 Report Posted April 30, 2014 Two of Max Hall, Cauchy Muamba and a mid round pick is the most I'd give up for him.
M.O.A.B. Posted April 30, 2014 Report Posted April 30, 2014 Mike reported that Bombers signed Maher cue the Renaud - Glenn trade
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now